Clinical features of fallers and non-fallers: finding best-performing combinations of physical performance measurements to discriminate physical impairments between fallers and non-fallers among older adults with and without osteoporosis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis International Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1007/s00198-024-07233-y
Rogerio Pessoto Hirata, Mikkel Jacobi Thomsen, Matthew Liston, Merete Grothe Christensen, Peter Vestergaard
{"title":"Clinical features of fallers and non-fallers: finding best-performing combinations of physical performance measurements to discriminate physical impairments between fallers and non-fallers among older adults with and without osteoporosis.","authors":"Rogerio Pessoto Hirata, Mikkel Jacobi Thomsen, Matthew Liston, Merete Grothe Christensen, Peter Vestergaard","doi":"10.1007/s00198-024-07233-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Is osteoporosis related to worst outcomes after fall accidents? After a fall accident, there were no differences in walking and balance between individuals with/without osteoporosis. Gains in fat tissue, higher pain, and difficulty to walk were related to previous falls, regardless of osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Impairments are expected after an accidental fall in the older age; whoever, it is still unclear if patients suffering from osteoporosis are in higher risks of fall accidents and if such accidents would cause worst outcomes compared with older adults without osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to discriminate fallers and non-fallers via a combination of physical performance measurements of older adults (65 + years) with and without osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older adults (n = 116) were screened for a previous fall accident and tested during (i) quiet stance; (ii) single- and dual-task walking; (iii) 8-Foot Up-and-Go; (iv) Mini BESTest; (v) 2-min step-in-place and (vi) 30-s chair stand. Evaluation of average daily pain intensity and total body fat% were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four subjects (38%) reported a previous fall accident. There was, however, no association between osteoporosis and previous fall. Fallers had a higher daily pain intensity, higher body fat%, slower walking speed during a cognitive dual-task test and worse performance at the 8-Foot Up-and-Go test and the Mini BESTest compared to non-fallers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the presence of osteoporosis might not increase the risk of fall accidents, healthcare professionals should expect that accidental falls in older adults are associated with higher body fat%, higher daily pain intensity and problems performing daily activities such as walking.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":" ","pages":"2007-2016"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07233-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is osteoporosis related to worst outcomes after fall accidents? After a fall accident, there were no differences in walking and balance between individuals with/without osteoporosis. Gains in fat tissue, higher pain, and difficulty to walk were related to previous falls, regardless of osteoporosis.

Purpose: Impairments are expected after an accidental fall in the older age; whoever, it is still unclear if patients suffering from osteoporosis are in higher risks of fall accidents and if such accidents would cause worst outcomes compared with older adults without osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to discriminate fallers and non-fallers via a combination of physical performance measurements of older adults (65 + years) with and without osteoporosis.

Methods: Older adults (n = 116) were screened for a previous fall accident and tested during (i) quiet stance; (ii) single- and dual-task walking; (iii) 8-Foot Up-and-Go; (iv) Mini BESTest; (v) 2-min step-in-place and (vi) 30-s chair stand. Evaluation of average daily pain intensity and total body fat% were obtained.

Results: Forty-four subjects (38%) reported a previous fall accident. There was, however, no association between osteoporosis and previous fall. Fallers had a higher daily pain intensity, higher body fat%, slower walking speed during a cognitive dual-task test and worse performance at the 8-Foot Up-and-Go test and the Mini BESTest compared to non-fallers.

Conclusions: Although the presence of osteoporosis might not increase the risk of fall accidents, healthcare professionals should expect that accidental falls in older adults are associated with higher body fat%, higher daily pain intensity and problems performing daily activities such as walking.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跌倒者和未跌倒者的临床特征:寻找最佳体能测量组合,以区分患有和未患有骨质疏松症的老年人中跌倒者和未跌倒者的体能损伤。
骨质疏松症与跌倒事故后的最坏结果有关吗?在跌倒事故后,患有/不患有骨质疏松症的个体在行走和平衡方面没有差异。无论是否患有骨质疏松症,脂肪组织增加、疼痛加剧和行走困难都与之前的跌倒有关。目的:老年人意外跌倒后预计会出现损伤;然而,与没有骨质疏松症的老年人相比,骨质疏松症患者发生跌倒事故的风险是否更高,以及此类事故是否会导致最坏的结果,目前仍不清楚。本研究的目的是通过对患有和未患有骨质疏松症的老年人(65 岁以上)进行体能测量来区分跌倒者和非跌倒者:方法:对曾发生过跌倒事故的老年人(n = 116)进行筛查,并在以下项目中进行测试:(i) 安静站立;(ii) 单任务和双任务行走;(iii) 8 英尺站立行走;(iv) 迷你 BESTest;(v) 2 分钟原地踏步;(vi) 30 秒椅子站立。结果显示,44 名受试者(38%)的疼痛强度和总体脂率得到了评估:结果:44 名受试者(38%)称曾发生过跌倒事故。然而,骨质疏松症与之前的跌倒并无关联。与非跌倒者相比,跌倒者的日常疼痛强度更高,体脂率更高,在认知双任务测试中行走速度更慢,在8英尺起跳测试和迷你BESTest中的表现更差:尽管患有骨质疏松症可能不会增加跌倒事故的风险,但医护人员应该意识到,老年人意外跌倒与较高的体脂率、较高的日常疼痛强度以及行走等日常活动问题有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis International
Osteoporosis International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition. While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exposure to air pollution might decrease bone mineral density and increase the prevalence of osteoporosis: A mendelian randomization study. Type 2 diabetes incidence in patients initiating denosumab or alendronate treatment: a primary care cohort study. Real-world efficacy of a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) compared with reference teriparatide on bone mineral density, trabecular bone score, and bone parameters assessed using quantitative ultrasound, 3D-SHAPER® and high-resolution peripheral computer tomography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and very high fracture risk. One versus 2 years of alendronate following denosumab: the CARD extension. Association of proton-density fat fraction with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1