A qualitative analysis of expert interviews on safety and risk.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1177/17446295241277920
Natalie M Driscoll, Peter F Gerhardt, Mary Jane Weiss, Lisa M Tereshko, Mark R Dixon, Ellie Kazemi, David J Cox
{"title":"A qualitative analysis of expert interviews on safety and risk.","authors":"Natalie M Driscoll, Peter F Gerhardt, Mary Jane Weiss, Lisa M Tereshko, Mark R Dixon, Ellie Kazemi, David J Cox","doi":"10.1177/17446295241277920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safety is a significant clinical challenge in settings serving adults with developmental disabilities. Few resources exist to guide clinical teams in this realm; this study explored safety elements through interviews with experts in critical areas of safety management. The present study aimed to gather knowledge and insights regarding assessing risk among individuals with disabilities. Due to gaps in the available safety literature in adult services, interviews in related areas were conducted and analyzed for thematic content. This paper focuses on the extracted safety themes' categorization, summarization, and implications. The safety themes extracted from the interviews included environmental arrangements, medical, independent living skills, historical indicators of risk, family life skills, challenging behavior, and communication. The interviews identified areas of concern that might guide assessment and inform providers about the most individually relevant contexts to consider when supporting clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241277920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety is a significant clinical challenge in settings serving adults with developmental disabilities. Few resources exist to guide clinical teams in this realm; this study explored safety elements through interviews with experts in critical areas of safety management. The present study aimed to gather knowledge and insights regarding assessing risk among individuals with disabilities. Due to gaps in the available safety literature in adult services, interviews in related areas were conducted and analyzed for thematic content. This paper focuses on the extracted safety themes' categorization, summarization, and implications. The safety themes extracted from the interviews included environmental arrangements, medical, independent living skills, historical indicators of risk, family life skills, challenging behavior, and communication. The interviews identified areas of concern that might guide assessment and inform providers about the most individually relevant contexts to consider when supporting clients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对安全与风险问题专家访谈的定性分析。
在为发育障碍成人提供服务的环境中,安全是一项重大的临床挑战。本研究通过对安全管理关键领域的专家进行访谈,探索安全要素。本研究旨在收集有关评估残障人士风险的知识和见解。由于现有的成人服务安全文献存在空白,我们对相关领域的专家进行了访谈,并对访谈内容进行了专题分析。本文将重点讨论所提取的安全主题的分类、总结和影响。从访谈中提取的安全主题包括环境安排、医疗、独立生活技能、历史风险指标、家庭生活技能、挑战行为和沟通。访谈发现了一些值得关注的领域,这些领域可以为评估提供指导,并让服务提供者了解在为服务对象提供支持时需要考虑的与个人最相关的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of attachment interventions for people with intellectual disability and their caregivers. The effect of motor dual-task training on gait and mobility performances in children with intellectual disabilities. Evidence-based decision-making in the treatment of speech, language, and communication disorders in Down syndrome; a scoping review. How differentiated can a new tablet-based reading screening measure the reading proficiency of students with intellectual disabilities? Comparing the impact of disability, disability type and grade level on reading skills. Trauma-informed counseling for individuals who have an intellectual developmental disorder: Considerations for mental health counselors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1