"It attracts your eyes and brain": Refining visualizations for shared decision-making with heart failure patients.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1055/a-2402-5832
Sabrina Mangal, Maryam Hyder, Kate Zarzuela, William McDonald, Ruth M Masterson Creber, Ian M Kronish, Stefan Konigorski, Mathew S Maurer, Monika M Safford, Mark S Lachs, Parag Goyal
{"title":"\"It attracts your eyes and brain\": Refining visualizations for shared decision-making with heart failure patients.","authors":"Sabrina Mangal, Maryam Hyder, Kate Zarzuela, William McDonald, Ruth M Masterson Creber, Ian M Kronish, Stefan Konigorski, Mathew S Maurer, Monika M Safford, Mark S Lachs, Parag Goyal","doi":"10.1055/a-2402-5832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information, and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 32 semi-structured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a beta-blocker. Interviews were conducted in-person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine participants provided feedback on how their data was displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: 1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, 2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and 3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2402-5832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making.

Objectives: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information, and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication.

Methods: We conducted 32 semi-structured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a beta-blocker. Interviews were conducted in-person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool.

Results: Nine participants provided feedback on how their data was displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: 1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, 2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and 3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse).

Conclusions: Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"它吸引你的眼睛和大脑":为心力衰竭患者的共同决策完善可视化。
背景:N-of-1试验已成为一种以患者为中心的个性化护理方法,患者可以利用自己的数据对循证治疗进行比较。然而,人们对向患者展示与药物治疗相关的 N-of-1 试验的个人层面数据以促进决策的最佳方法知之甚少:我们对接受 N-of-1 试验的射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者进行了定性访谈,以迭代、改进和优化面向患者的数据可视化工具,用于显示 N-of-1 药物试验的结果。优化该工具的目的是促进患者对其个人健康信息的了解,并最终促进患者就继续用药或停药做出共同决策:在 9 名参与者参与 N-of-1 试验的过程中,我们对他们进行了 32 次半结构化定性访谈。N-of-1试验旨在对继续服用和停用β-受体阻滞剂进行比较。在每个疗程结束后,我们都会亲自或通过电话对参与者进行访谈,以评估他们对数据可视化工具原型的看法。两名独立审稿人采用定向内容分析法对数据进行编码,并在必要时邀请第三名审稿人达成共识。提取主要的主题,并将其反复融入面向患者的数据可视化工具中:九名参与者就可视化工具如何显示其数据提供了反馈意见。经过定性分析,我们得出了三大主题,并将其融入到最终界面中。参与者更喜欢1)清晰的单个症状评分;2)带有标签的参考图片,以指导他们解释症状信息;3)定性语言而非数字,以传达评分变化的含义(如更好、更差):反馈意见为设计面向患者的数据可视化工具提供了参考,该工具适用于与药物治疗相关的 N-of-1 试验。未来的工作应包括在更大范围内对该界面进行可用性和理解力测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review. A human-centered approach for designing a social care referral platform. Ethical dimensions of clinical data sharing by US healthcare organizations for purposes beyond direct patient care: Interviews with healthcare leaders. Special Issue on Informatics Education A Longitudinal Graduate Medical Education Curriculum in Clinical Informatics: Function, Structure, and Evaluation. Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients During Teleconsultation. Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1