Impact of Music on Postoperative Pain, Anxiety, and Narcotic Use After Robotic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kirtishri Mishra, Erin Jesse, Laura Bukavina, Emily Sopko, Itunu Arojo, Austin Fernstrum, Al Ray, Amr Mahran, Adam Calaway, Seneca Block, Lee Ponsky
{"title":"Impact of Music on Postoperative Pain, Anxiety, and Narcotic Use After Robotic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Kirtishri Mishra, Erin Jesse, Laura Bukavina, Emily Sopko, Itunu Arojo, Austin Fernstrum, Al Ray, Amr Mahran, Adam Calaway, Seneca Block, Lee Ponsky","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Music is a safe and cost-effective intervention that can reduce postoperative pain and anxiety. We investigated the effects of music therapy on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were males 18 years and older undergoing RALP at a single tertiary care institution. Patients were randomized to music or control groups. The music group received 30 minutes of music in the recovery area and on postoperative day (POD) 1, while the control group was not provided postoperative music. Inpatient narcotic use (morphine milligram equivalent, or MME) and outpatient narcotic use were measured, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) survey was completed on POD 1 and POD 7 by an inpatient advanced practitioner (AP). T-test and Chi-square were used to compare the groups. Linear regression was used to adjust for age, blood loss, and inpatient MME.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients were prospectively recruited. There was no statistically significant difference in the hourly MME (2.06 [0.71-3.17] vs. 1.55 [0.83-3.37]) or total MME (49.52 [17-76] vs. 37.25 [20-69]) used in the music vs. non-music arms, respectively. Evaluation of STAI questionnaire revealed no overall differences in anxiety levels among the two groups on POD 1 or POD 7. After adjusting for age, blood loss, and inpatient MME use, patients assigned to the music intervention had a 26% reduction in post-hospitalization use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our prospective randomized study suggests that music can be an AP-driven adjunct to facilitate postoperative patient comfort and reduce narcotic use upon discharge in prostate cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","volume":"13 2","pages":"121-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Music is a safe and cost-effective intervention that can reduce postoperative pain and anxiety. We investigated the effects of music therapy on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

Methods: Subjects were males 18 years and older undergoing RALP at a single tertiary care institution. Patients were randomized to music or control groups. The music group received 30 minutes of music in the recovery area and on postoperative day (POD) 1, while the control group was not provided postoperative music. Inpatient narcotic use (morphine milligram equivalent, or MME) and outpatient narcotic use were measured, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) survey was completed on POD 1 and POD 7 by an inpatient advanced practitioner (AP). T-test and Chi-square were used to compare the groups. Linear regression was used to adjust for age, blood loss, and inpatient MME.

Results: A total of 40 patients were prospectively recruited. There was no statistically significant difference in the hourly MME (2.06 [0.71-3.17] vs. 1.55 [0.83-3.37]) or total MME (49.52 [17-76] vs. 37.25 [20-69]) used in the music vs. non-music arms, respectively. Evaluation of STAI questionnaire revealed no overall differences in anxiety levels among the two groups on POD 1 or POD 7. After adjusting for age, blood loss, and inpatient MME use, patients assigned to the music intervention had a 26% reduction in post-hospitalization use.

Conclusion: Our prospective randomized study suggests that music can be an AP-driven adjunct to facilitate postoperative patient comfort and reduce narcotic use upon discharge in prostate cancer patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐对机器人前列腺切除术后疼痛、焦虑和麻醉剂使用的影响:随机对照试验
背景:音乐是一种安全且具有成本效益的干预措施,可以减轻术后疼痛和焦虑。我们研究了音乐疗法对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)患者术后恢复的影响:受试者为在一家三级医疗机构接受 RALP 手术的 18 岁及以上男性。患者被随机分为音乐组和对照组。音乐组在恢复区和术后第 1 天 (POD) 播放 30 分钟音乐,而对照组术后不播放音乐。住院麻醉剂使用量(吗啡毫克当量,或 MME)和门诊麻醉剂使用量进行了测量,并由一名住院高级执业医师(AP)在术后第 1 天和第 7 天完成了状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)调查。采用 T 检验和卡方检验对各组进行比较。线性回归用于调整年龄、失血量和住院 MME:共招募了 40 名患者。音乐组和非音乐组的每小时 MME(2.06 [0.71-3.17] vs. 1.55 [0.83-3.37] )和总 MME(49.52 [17-76] vs. 37.25 [20-69])分别没有明显的统计学差异。对 STAI 问卷的评估显示,两组患者在 POD 1 或 POD 7 的焦虑水平总体上没有差异。在对年龄、失血量和住院期间使用的 MME 进行调整后,接受音乐干预的患者住院后使用的 MME 减少了 26%:我们的前瞻性随机研究表明,音乐可以作为 AP 驱动的辅助手段,提高前列腺癌患者术后的舒适度,减少出院时麻醉剂的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Carcinoid Heart Disease. How Do We Achieve Value-Based, Patient-Centered Care? Is it Cellulitis Again? Erythema Concerning for Infection in Children With High-Risk Solid Tumors Who Have a Gastrostomy Tube. Sutimlimab for Cold Agglutinin Disease. Artificial Intelligence: How Is it Relevant to Advanced Practitioners?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1