Monitoring and assessment in the context of governance of nature-based solutions. Shared challenges and opportunities in CELAC and EU cities

Martina van Lierop , Cynnamon Dobbs , Camila Flores , Alexander van der Jagt , Andrea Skiba , Giuliano Maselli Locosselli , Denise Duarte , Arjen Buijs , Aude Zingraff-Hamed , Stephan Pauleit
{"title":"Monitoring and assessment in the context of governance of nature-based solutions. Shared challenges and opportunities in CELAC and EU cities","authors":"Martina van Lierop ,&nbsp;Cynnamon Dobbs ,&nbsp;Camila Flores ,&nbsp;Alexander van der Jagt ,&nbsp;Andrea Skiba ,&nbsp;Giuliano Maselli Locosselli ,&nbsp;Denise Duarte ,&nbsp;Arjen Buijs ,&nbsp;Aude Zingraff-Hamed ,&nbsp;Stephan Pauleit","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) has gained interest as an approach to make significant contributions to the transformation towards more liveable, sustainable, and climate-resilient cities. However, the uptake of NbS into urban development practice is hindered by knowledge and governance barriers. Knowledge plays an essential role in evidence-based decision-making processes and in building the capacity to co-design sustainable pathways. In turn, governance processes can greatly support the acquisition, dissemination and application of knowledge. However, little is known about how these interactions between governance and knowledge manifest in practice. Therefore, we aim to understand the interplay between governance and monitoring &amp; assessment (M&amp;A) and the associated challenges and opportunities for NbS implementation in European and Latin American cities. Considering different socio-economic and cultural contexts allows us to draw from a wider range of practitioners’ experiences in different governance settings. We conducted an explorative qualitative content analysis on ten semi-structured expert interviews with thirteen city experts from local governments and academia based in seven cities: Bogota (CO), Buenos Aires (AR), Santiago (CL), São Paulo (BR), Barcelona (ES), Lisbon (PT) and Turin (IT). Our findings show that M&amp;A provides agency for individual, institutional actors to steer political commitment and can support integrated working. The potential of collaborative M&amp;A with non-governmental actors is still largely untapped, which requires acknowledgement of the capacities of non-governmental actors to contribute to M&amp;A and raise awareness of the value of M&amp;A to civil society. Furthermore, we recommend integrating more reflective learning opportunities in M&amp;A processes, paying more attention to data sharing, and considering of more feasible M&amp;A processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000612/pdfft?md5=0a368deb568fdb8401d485e3262ae75b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772411524000612-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) has gained interest as an approach to make significant contributions to the transformation towards more liveable, sustainable, and climate-resilient cities. However, the uptake of NbS into urban development practice is hindered by knowledge and governance barriers. Knowledge plays an essential role in evidence-based decision-making processes and in building the capacity to co-design sustainable pathways. In turn, governance processes can greatly support the acquisition, dissemination and application of knowledge. However, little is known about how these interactions between governance and knowledge manifest in practice. Therefore, we aim to understand the interplay between governance and monitoring & assessment (M&A) and the associated challenges and opportunities for NbS implementation in European and Latin American cities. Considering different socio-economic and cultural contexts allows us to draw from a wider range of practitioners’ experiences in different governance settings. We conducted an explorative qualitative content analysis on ten semi-structured expert interviews with thirteen city experts from local governments and academia based in seven cities: Bogota (CO), Buenos Aires (AR), Santiago (CL), São Paulo (BR), Barcelona (ES), Lisbon (PT) and Turin (IT). Our findings show that M&A provides agency for individual, institutional actors to steer political commitment and can support integrated working. The potential of collaborative M&A with non-governmental actors is still largely untapped, which requires acknowledgement of the capacities of non-governmental actors to contribute to M&A and raise awareness of the value of M&A to civil society. Furthermore, we recommend integrating more reflective learning opportunities in M&A processes, paying more attention to data sharing, and considering of more feasible M&A processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于自然的解决方案治理背景下的监测与评估。拉加共同体和欧盟城市面临的共同挑战和机遇
以自然为基础的解决方案(NbS)的概念已引起人们的兴趣,因为它是一种可为向更宜居、可持续和气候适应性更强的城市转变做出重大贡献的方法。然而,知识和治理方面的障碍阻碍了将 NbS 纳入城市发展实践。知识在循证决策过程和共同设计可持续发展道路的能力建设中发挥着至关重要的作用。反过来,治理过程可以极大地支持知识的获取、传播和应用。然而,人们对治理与知识之间的互动在实践中是如何体现的知之甚少。因此,我们旨在了解治理与监测和评估(M&A)之间的相互作用,以及在欧洲和拉丁美洲城市实施 NbS 所面临的相关挑战和机遇。考虑到不同的社会经济和文化背景,我们可以从不同治理环境中的从业人员那里汲取更广泛的经验。我们对来自七个城市的十三位地方政府和学术界的城市专家进行了十次半结构式专家访谈,并对访谈内容进行了探索性定性分析:这些城市包括:波哥大(哥伦比亚)、布宜诺斯艾利斯(阿根廷)、圣地亚哥(智利)、圣保罗(巴西)、巴塞罗那(西班牙)、里斯本(葡萄牙)和都灵(意大利)。我们的研究结果表明,M&A 为个人和机构行动者提供了引导政治承诺的机构,并能支持综合工作。与非政府行动者合作开展管理与评估的潜力在很大程度上仍未得到开发,这就需要承认非政府行动者为管理与评估做出贡献的能力,并提高对管理与评估对民间社会价值的认识。此外,我们建议在 M&A 过程中纳入更多的反思学习机会,更加关注数据共享,并考虑更加可行的 M&A 过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Money talks. A systems perspective on funding and financing barriers to nature-based solutions Exploring social contracts of disaster risk through twitter narratives during a major storm A transformations framework for mainstreaming a nature-based solutions approach Cost-benefit and equity analysis of nature-based solutions in Haiti, India, Indonesia and Uganda “Financing urban Nature-based Solutions (NBS): A literature review from the perspective of funders”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1