Association between psychosocial factors and left ventricular assist device implant outcomes: A systematic review

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.007
Joy J. Choi, Shreya Bhasin, Johannes Levstik, Patrick Walsh, Mark A. Oldham, Hochang Benjamin Lee
{"title":"Association between psychosocial factors and left ventricular assist device implant outcomes: A systematic review","authors":"Joy J. Choi,&nbsp;Shreya Bhasin,&nbsp;Johannes Levstik,&nbsp;Patrick Walsh,&nbsp;Mark A. Oldham,&nbsp;Hochang Benjamin Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Psychosocial assessment is a core component of the multidisciplinary evaluation for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The degree to which psychosocial conditions are considered a contraindication to LVAD implantation continues to be debated. This systematic review examines modifiable psychosocial factors as predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The search resulted in 2509 articles. After deduplication, abstract and full-text review, 20 relevant articles were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Included studies evaluated socioeconomic status (<em>n</em> = 6), caregiver characteristics (<em>n</em> = 6), non-adherence (<em>n</em> = 6), substance use (<em>n</em> = 13), and psychiatric disorder (<em>n</em> = 8). The most commonly measured outcomes were all-cause death, readmission rate, and adverse events. Studies varied widely in definition of each psychosocial factor and selected outcomes. No psychosocial factor was consistently associated with a specific outcome in all studies. Socioeconomic status was generally not associated with outcomes. Non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were associated with higher risks of mortality, adverse events, and/or readmission. Findings on caregiver characteristics were mixed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Of the psychosocial factors studied, non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were the most consistently associated with an increased risk of mortality, readmission, and/or adverse events. Heterogeneity in research methodology and study quality across studies precludes firm conclusions regarding the impact of psychosocial factors on long-term patient outcomes. The results of this review reveal a need for adequately powered studies that use uniform definitions of psychosocial factors to clarify relationships between these factors and outcomes after LVAD implantation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 132-140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324001762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychosocial assessment is a core component of the multidisciplinary evaluation for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The degree to which psychosocial conditions are considered a contraindication to LVAD implantation continues to be debated. This systematic review examines modifiable psychosocial factors as predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The search resulted in 2509 articles. After deduplication, abstract and full-text review, 20 relevant articles were identified.

Results

Included studies evaluated socioeconomic status (n = 6), caregiver characteristics (n = 6), non-adherence (n = 6), substance use (n = 13), and psychiatric disorder (n = 8). The most commonly measured outcomes were all-cause death, readmission rate, and adverse events. Studies varied widely in definition of each psychosocial factor and selected outcomes. No psychosocial factor was consistently associated with a specific outcome in all studies. Socioeconomic status was generally not associated with outcomes. Non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were associated with higher risks of mortality, adverse events, and/or readmission. Findings on caregiver characteristics were mixed.

Conclusion

Of the psychosocial factors studied, non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were the most consistently associated with an increased risk of mortality, readmission, and/or adverse events. Heterogeneity in research methodology and study quality across studies precludes firm conclusions regarding the impact of psychosocial factors on long-term patient outcomes. The results of this review reveal a need for adequately powered studies that use uniform definitions of psychosocial factors to clarify relationships between these factors and outcomes after LVAD implantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会心理因素与左心室辅助装置植入结果之间的关系:系统回顾
背景社会心理评估是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入多学科评估的核心组成部分。社会心理状况在多大程度上被视为 LVAD 植入的禁忌症仍存在争议。本系统性综述研究了作为 LVAD 植入患者预后预测因素的可改变的社会心理因素。方法我们按照系统性综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统性综述。共检索到 2509 篇文章。结果纳入的研究对社会经济状况(6 篇)、护理人员特征(6 篇)、非依从性(6 篇)、药物使用(13 篇)和精神障碍(8 篇)进行了评估。最常测量的结果是全因死亡、再入院率和不良事件。各项研究对社会心理因素和所选结果的定义差异很大。在所有研究中,没有任何一项社会心理因素与特定结果一致。社会经济状况一般与结果无关。不坚持治疗、精神障碍和药物使用与较高的死亡、不良事件和/或再入院风险有关。结论 在所研究的社会心理因素中,不坚持治疗、精神障碍和药物使用与死亡率、再次入院和/或不良事件风险增加的关系最为一致。由于不同研究的研究方法和研究质量存在差异,因此无法就社会心理因素对患者长期预后的影响得出确切结论。本综述的结果表明,有必要进行充分的研究,采用统一的社会心理因素定义,以明确这些因素与 LVAD 植入术后预后之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
The effect of inhaled aromatherapy on cognitive function in patients with cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Establishment and clinical impacts of decision-support system for older patients with aortic valve stenosis: A retrospective observational study. Development and validation of the BRief Eating Disorder Screener (BREDS) for US veterans in healthcare and community settings. Understanding years of life lost to psychiatric disorders: A review and recommendations for further research. Psychiatric comorbidity in eating disorders: The urgency of an integrated approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1