Shared decision-making in maternity care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104147
Tahani Ali Alruwaili , Kimberley Crawford , Ensieh Fooladi
{"title":"Shared decision-making in maternity care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Tahani Ali Alruwaili ,&nbsp;Kimberley Crawford ,&nbsp;Ensieh Fooladi","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Shared decision-making (SDM) in maternity care involves women actively in decisions, thereby reducing decisional conflicts and enhancing satisfaction with care.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To investigate SDM and the factors associated with it, and its correlation with respect in maternity care in Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive, nationwide online questionnaire-based study was conducted between January to May 2023, involving women aged 18 years and above who were either pregnant or had experienced pregnancy/childbirth in the past 12 months. The Mothers’ Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale and the Mothers of Respect Index (MORi) were used. Low to very low SDM was defined as a score of ≤ 24 on the MADM and low to very low respected was defined as a score of ≤ 49 on the MORi.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 505 women completed the survey. Low to very low SDM was reported by 137 (34.1 %, 95 confidence interval (CI), 29.6 % - 38.9 %) women. Factors significantly associated with low to very low SDM included seeing different obstetricians of different gender at each visit (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.0, 95 % CI, 1.0 – 3.9), not meeting the same obstetrician throughout the pregnancy (AOR 2.6, 95 % CI, 1.2 – 5.6) and having an instrumental vaginal birth (AOR 6.67, 95 % CI, 1.6 - 28.1). There was a positive association between low to very SDM and feeling of low to very low respect ((χ2 = 83.8173, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>More than one-third of women experienced low to very low SDM in maternity care. This should alert healthcare providers to the importance of continuity of care in Saudi Arabia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002304/pdfft?md5=f4fc0c296bd53fe6a72dfa75e01c2b52&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824002304-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Shared decision-making (SDM) in maternity care involves women actively in decisions, thereby reducing decisional conflicts and enhancing satisfaction with care.

Aim

To investigate SDM and the factors associated with it, and its correlation with respect in maternity care in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

A comprehensive, nationwide online questionnaire-based study was conducted between January to May 2023, involving women aged 18 years and above who were either pregnant or had experienced pregnancy/childbirth in the past 12 months. The Mothers’ Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale and the Mothers of Respect Index (MORi) were used. Low to very low SDM was defined as a score of ≤ 24 on the MADM and low to very low respected was defined as a score of ≤ 49 on the MORi.

Results

A total of 505 women completed the survey. Low to very low SDM was reported by 137 (34.1 %, 95 confidence interval (CI), 29.6 % - 38.9 %) women. Factors significantly associated with low to very low SDM included seeing different obstetricians of different gender at each visit (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.0, 95 % CI, 1.0 – 3.9), not meeting the same obstetrician throughout the pregnancy (AOR 2.6, 95 % CI, 1.2 – 5.6) and having an instrumental vaginal birth (AOR 6.67, 95 % CI, 1.6 - 28.1). There was a positive association between low to very SDM and feeling of low to very low respect ((χ2 = 83.8173, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

More than one-third of women experienced low to very low SDM in maternity care. This should alert healthcare providers to the importance of continuity of care in Saudi Arabia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯孕产妇护理中的共同决策:横断面研究
背景产科护理中的共同决策(SDM)让女性积极参与决策,从而减少决策冲突并提高护理满意度。目的调查沙特阿拉伯产科护理中的 SDM 及其相关因素,以及其与尊重的相关性。方法在 2023 年 1 月至 5 月期间开展了一项基于在线问卷的全国性综合研究,研究对象为 18 岁及以上、怀孕或在过去 12 个月中经历过怀孕/分娩的女性。研究采用了母亲自主决策量表(MADM)和母亲尊重指数(MORi)。MADM评分≤24分为 "低度至极度低度SDM",MORi评分≤49分为 "低度至极度低度受尊重"。137名(34.1%,95 置信区间 (CI),29.6% - 38.9%)女性表示 SDM 低至很低。与低至极低 SDM 显著相关的因素包括:每次就诊时都见到不同性别的产科医生(调整后的几率比(AOR)为 2.0,95 % CI,1.0 - 3.9);整个孕期没有见到同一位产科医生(AOR 2.6,95 % CI,1.2 - 5.6);以及阴道助产(AOR 6.67,95 % CI,1.6 - 28.1)。低度至极度 SDM 与低度至极度受尊重感之间存在正相关(χ2 = 83.8173,p < 0.001)。在沙特阿拉伯,医疗服务提供者应警惕连续性护理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board My ‘normal’ isn't your normal...What is maternal wellbeing? A scoping review How valuable is an implementation toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study Protecting mothers against posttraumatic stress symptoms related to childbirth: What's the role of formal and informal support? Decoding Newly Graduated Midwives: A Value-Based Philosophy of Vocational and Professional Midwifery Program in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1