Caregiver perceptions of complementary feeding in rural and urban Indonesia: A qualitative comparative study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104146
{"title":"Caregiver perceptions of complementary feeding in rural and urban Indonesia: A qualitative comparative study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore caregivers’ perspectives on complementary feeding in rural and urban areas of Central Java, Indonesia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A qualitative comparative study using in-depth interviews. We applied thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes and presented representative quotes.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Rural and urban villages in Central Java Province, Indonesia.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>46 mothers and grandmothers of 6- to 23-month-old children.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We identified five themes: 1) timing of food introduction, 2) types of complementary foods, 3) meal preparations, 4) complementary food benefits, and 5) expectations toward complementary foods. While caregivers in urban areas had more favourable perceptions of complementary feeding, some misperceptions existed regarding complementary feeding in both areas. These misconceptions included the age of complementary food introduction, the delay in introducing animal-source foods, and the emphasis on any food the child preferred as long as they ate rather than on healthy food choices.</p></div><div><h3>Key conclusions</h3><p>There were similarities and differences in complementary feeding perspectives between caregivers in rural and urban areas. Therefore, policymakers and public health workers should design interventions to enhance complementary feeding practices by addressing the contextual issues in specific settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore caregivers’ perspectives on complementary feeding in rural and urban areas of Central Java, Indonesia.

Design

A qualitative comparative study using in-depth interviews. We applied thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes and presented representative quotes.

Setting

Rural and urban villages in Central Java Province, Indonesia.

Participants

46 mothers and grandmothers of 6- to 23-month-old children.

Findings

We identified five themes: 1) timing of food introduction, 2) types of complementary foods, 3) meal preparations, 4) complementary food benefits, and 5) expectations toward complementary foods. While caregivers in urban areas had more favourable perceptions of complementary feeding, some misperceptions existed regarding complementary feeding in both areas. These misconceptions included the age of complementary food introduction, the delay in introducing animal-source foods, and the emphasis on any food the child preferred as long as they ate rather than on healthy food choices.

Key conclusions

There were similarities and differences in complementary feeding perspectives between caregivers in rural and urban areas. Therefore, policymakers and public health workers should design interventions to enhance complementary feeding practices by addressing the contextual issues in specific settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚农村和城市的护理人员对辅食喂养的看法:定性比较研究
目标探讨印度尼西亚中爪哇省农村和城市地区护理人员对辅食喂养的看法。研究结果我们确定了五个主题:1)添加食物的时间;2)辅食的种类;3)膳食的准备;4)辅食的益处;5)对辅食的期望。虽然城市地区的照顾者对辅食喂养有更多的好感,但两个地区的照顾者对辅食喂养都存在一些误解。这些误解包括添加辅食的年龄、推迟添加动物源性食物,以及强调只要孩子喜欢吃任何食物就可以,而不是选择健康的食物。因此,政策制定者和公共卫生工作者应针对具体情况设计干预措施,以加强辅食喂养实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Maternal experiences and preference of maternity services in Singapore: A descriptive qualitative study. Breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers: The body image and emotional intelligence perspective Perspectives of health care providers on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound in lower-level health facilities in Kenya. Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review. Perceived stress and prenatal depression symptoms among couples with gestational diabetes mellitus: The mediating role of dyadic coping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1