Effects of the consumption of algal biomass versus protein concentrate on postprandial satiety and metabolism

IF 7.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Future Foods Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100436
{"title":"Effects of the consumption of algal biomass versus protein concentrate on postprandial satiety and metabolism","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Algae are promising sources of nutritious and sustainable protein, but little is known about their metabolic health impact and acceptability as meal ingredients. This acute, randomized, controlled, five-way crossover trial compared whole algal biomasses and their corresponding protein concentrates to soy protein concentrate in terms of palatability, appetite, satiety, and metabolic response. Nineteen healthy Chinese males (21–50 years, 18.5–25.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) consumed noodle meals supplemented with 10 g of nori biomass/protein concentrate (NB/NC), <em>Chlorella vulgaris</em> biomass/protein concentrate (CB/CC) or soy protein concentrate control (CON) in randomized order. At regular intervals, blood samples were collected to measure biochemical markers, while gastrointestinal tolerance, palatability, and appetite were assessed using questionnaires and visual analog scales (VAS). Results indicated that algae-enriched meals were well-tolerated and comparable to soy in both visual appeal and smell, with NB and CC outperforming soy in aftertaste (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). There were no significant differences between treatments in glucose, insulin, C-peptide, appetite/satiety, plasma ghrelin, and GLP-1. However, exploratory analysis of serum triglycerides revealed significant time × treatment effects (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.004) and differences in incremental area under the curve (iAUC<sub>0–120,</sub> <em>p</em> = 0.0249). Our findings reveal that algal biomasses and protein concentrates are as comparable to soy protein concentrate in palatability, satiety, and metabolic outcomes, highlighting their potential as practical, sustainable, and nutritious ingredients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833524001424/pdfft?md5=6cee96dccb19b0d28809fce2f10e4b28&pid=1-s2.0-S2666833524001424-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833524001424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Algae are promising sources of nutritious and sustainable protein, but little is known about their metabolic health impact and acceptability as meal ingredients. This acute, randomized, controlled, five-way crossover trial compared whole algal biomasses and their corresponding protein concentrates to soy protein concentrate in terms of palatability, appetite, satiety, and metabolic response. Nineteen healthy Chinese males (21–50 years, 18.5–25.0 kg/m2) consumed noodle meals supplemented with 10 g of nori biomass/protein concentrate (NB/NC), Chlorella vulgaris biomass/protein concentrate (CB/CC) or soy protein concentrate control (CON) in randomized order. At regular intervals, blood samples were collected to measure biochemical markers, while gastrointestinal tolerance, palatability, and appetite were assessed using questionnaires and visual analog scales (VAS). Results indicated that algae-enriched meals were well-tolerated and comparable to soy in both visual appeal and smell, with NB and CC outperforming soy in aftertaste (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between treatments in glucose, insulin, C-peptide, appetite/satiety, plasma ghrelin, and GLP-1. However, exploratory analysis of serum triglycerides revealed significant time × treatment effects (p < 0.004) and differences in incremental area under the curve (iAUC0–120, p = 0.0249). Our findings reveal that algal biomasses and protein concentrates are as comparable to soy protein concentrate in palatability, satiety, and metabolic outcomes, highlighting their potential as practical, sustainable, and nutritious ingredients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食用海藻生物质和浓缩蛋白质对餐后饱腹感和新陈代谢的影响
藻类是有前景的营养和可持续蛋白质来源,但人们对藻类作为膳食配料对代谢健康的影响和可接受性知之甚少。这项急性、随机、对照、五向交叉试验从适口性、食欲、饱腹感和代谢反应等方面比较了全海藻生物质及其相应的浓缩蛋白质与大豆浓缩蛋白质。19 名健康的中国男性(21-50 岁,18.5-25.0 kg/m2)按随机顺序食用了添加了 10 克紫菜生物质/浓缩蛋白(NB/NC)、小球藻生物质/浓缩蛋白(CB/CC)或浓缩大豆蛋白对照组(CON)的面条。每隔一段时间采集血液样本以测定生化指标,同时使用问卷和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估胃肠道耐受性、适口性和食欲。结果表明,富含藻类的膳食具有良好的耐受性,在视觉吸引力和气味方面与大豆相当,NB和CC在回味方面优于大豆(p < 0.05)。各处理之间在葡萄糖、胰岛素、C 肽、食欲/焦虑、血浆胃泌素和 GLP-1 方面没有明显差异。然而,对血清甘油三酯的探索性分析表明,时间 × 治疗效应(p < 0.004)和曲线下增量面积(iAUC0-120,p = 0.0249)存在显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,藻类生物质和浓缩蛋白在适口性、饱腹感和代谢结果方面与大豆浓缩蛋白相当,凸显了它们作为实用、可持续和营养配料的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of processed foods as unhealthy: Heuristic strength, prevalence, and potential implications for the protein shift Insights on purchase intention of mutton shashlik - A survey of Chinese consumers based on fsQCA Structural characterization and immune-enhancing properties of an acidic heteroglycan from Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis larvae Comparative analyses of the nutritional and antinutritional composition of pod flours from Neltuma spp. (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae) species from drylands of Mexico, Kenya and Tanzania Development of seasoned green mussel (Perna viridis) with sodium reduction using stealth reduction approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1