Barriers and facilitators to implement the redispensing of unused oral anticancer drugs in clinical care: A hybrid-effectiveness type I study

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100493
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to implement the redispensing of unused oral anticancer drugs in clinical care: A hybrid-effectiveness type I study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Minimizing medication waste through the redispensing of oral anticancer drugs (OADs) that were unused by patients provides economic and environmental benefits, but this is not yet universally implemented in clinical care.</p></div><div><h3>Objective(S)</h3><p>To identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of redispensing unused OADs in clinical care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multicentre intervention study following a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design was conducted, consisting of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders involved in the redispensing program: pharmacy employees, prescribing clinicians in oncology and haematology, patients who participated in redispensing and patients who declined trial participation. Questions encompassed experiences and suggestions for future implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data collection and categorisation of identified barriers and facilitators through thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 35 interviews were conducted, identifying 15 themes encompassing barriers and facilitators, reflecting all CFIR domains. Facilitators encompassed: 1) convenient process requiring an acceptable time-investment; 2) support from project leaders and implementation champions; 3) being well-motivated by personal values and societal impact; 4) feeling ensured of medication quality upon redispensing; 5) endorsement by healthcare providers for patient participation; 6) clear and personal patient communication; 7) good visibility of intervention successes; and 8) implementation well supported through a collaborative network. Barriers encompassed: 1) unclear target population; 2) redispensing legally prohibited; 3) absence of financial compensation for pharmacies; 4) complexity arising from two parallel work processes; 5) widespread communication on adjustments within local teams challenging; 6) patient's low receptiveness due to burden of oncology treatment; and 7) lack of familiarization among pharmacy technicians.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Facilitators for implementation of redispensing unused drugs mainly related to people's values, motivation, and societal demand, whereas barriers mainly encompassed practical issues, including knowledge, time, financial resources, and legal conditions. Strategies emphasizing the benefits of redispensing and further streamlining process compatibility could support implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000908/pdfft?md5=09cc8cad4538f7d46ef03f01abd7fac9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000908-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Minimizing medication waste through the redispensing of oral anticancer drugs (OADs) that were unused by patients provides economic and environmental benefits, but this is not yet universally implemented in clinical care.

Objective(S)

To identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of redispensing unused OADs in clinical care.

Methods

A multicentre intervention study following a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design was conducted, consisting of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders involved in the redispensing program: pharmacy employees, prescribing clinicians in oncology and haematology, patients who participated in redispensing and patients who declined trial participation. Questions encompassed experiences and suggestions for future implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data collection and categorisation of identified barriers and facilitators through thematic analysis.

Results

In total, 35 interviews were conducted, identifying 15 themes encompassing barriers and facilitators, reflecting all CFIR domains. Facilitators encompassed: 1) convenient process requiring an acceptable time-investment; 2) support from project leaders and implementation champions; 3) being well-motivated by personal values and societal impact; 4) feeling ensured of medication quality upon redispensing; 5) endorsement by healthcare providers for patient participation; 6) clear and personal patient communication; 7) good visibility of intervention successes; and 8) implementation well supported through a collaborative network. Barriers encompassed: 1) unclear target population; 2) redispensing legally prohibited; 3) absence of financial compensation for pharmacies; 4) complexity arising from two parallel work processes; 5) widespread communication on adjustments within local teams challenging; 6) patient's low receptiveness due to burden of oncology treatment; and 7) lack of familiarization among pharmacy technicians.

Conclusions

Facilitators for implementation of redispensing unused drugs mainly related to people's values, motivation, and societal demand, whereas barriers mainly encompassed practical issues, including knowledge, time, financial resources, and legal conditions. Strategies emphasizing the benefits of redispensing and further streamlining process compatibility could support implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床护理中重新分配未使用的口服抗癌药物的障碍和促进因素:混合效益 I 型研究
背景通过重新发放患者未使用的口服抗癌药(OAD)来减少药物浪费,可带来经济和环境效益,但这一做法尚未在临床护理中得到普遍实施。目的确定在临床护理中重新发放未使用的口服抗癌药的障碍和促进因素。方法 采用混合有效性-实施类型 I 设计进行了一项多中心干预研究,包括对参与重新发放计划的主要利益相关者进行半结构化访谈:药房员工、肿瘤科和血液科开处方的临床医生、参与重新发放的患者以及拒绝参与试验的患者。问题包括经验和对未来实施的建议。结果共进行了 35 次访谈,确定了包含障碍和促进因素的 15 个主题,反映了实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的所有领域。促进因素包括1) 需要投入可接受的时间,过程方便;2) 项目负责人和实施倡导者的支持;3) 个人价值和社会影响的良好激励;4) 重新配药时感觉药品质量有保证;5) 医疗服务提供者对患者参与的认可;6) 清晰和个性化的患者沟通;7) 干预成功的良好可见度;以及 8) 通过协作网络对实施的良好支持。障碍包括1) 目标人群不明确;2) 法律禁止再分配;3) 药房没有经济补偿;4) 两个平行的工作流程造成的复杂性;5) 地方团队内部就调整问题进行广泛沟通具有挑战性;6) 由于肿瘤治疗的负担,患者接受度低;7) 药房技术人员缺乏熟悉情况。结论实施未用药品再分配的促进因素主要与人们的价值观、动机和社会需求有关,而障碍主要包括实际问题,包括知识、时间、经济资源和法律条件。强调重新发放的益处并进一步简化流程的兼容性的策略可以支持重新发放的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics: A single center cross-sectional study Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand Comparing nursing medication rounds before and after implementation of automated dispensing cabinets: A time and motion study Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the general medication adherence scale (GMAS) in patients with high blood pressure A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1