What characteristics of clinical decision support system implementations lead to adoption for regular use? A scoping review.

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Health & Care Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101046
Adele Hill, Dylan Morrissey, William Marsh
{"title":"What characteristics of clinical decision support system implementations lead to adoption for regular use? A scoping review.","authors":"Adele Hill, Dylan Morrissey, William Marsh","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital healthcare innovation has yielded many prototype clinical decision support (CDS) systems, however, few are fully adopted into practice, despite successful research outcomes. We aimed to explore the characteristics of implementations in clinical practice to inform future innovation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Web of Science, Trip Database, PubMed, NHS Digital and the BMA website were searched for examples of CDS systems in May 2022 and updated in June 2023. Papers were included if they reported on a CDS giving pathway advice to a clinician, adopted into regular clinical practice and had sufficient published information for analysis. Examples were excluded if they were only used in a research setting or intended for patients. Articles found in citation searches were assessed alongside a detailed hand search of the grey literature to gather all available information, including commercial information. Examples were excluded if there was insufficient information for analysis. The normalisation process theory (NPT) framework informed analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>22 implemented CDS projects were included, with 53 related publications or sources of information (40 peer-reviewed publications and 13 alternative sources). NPT framework analysis indicated organisational support was paramount to successful adoption of CDS. Ensuring that workflows were optimised for patient care alongside iterative, mixed-methods implementation was key to engaging clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Extensive searches revealed few examples of CDS available for analysis, highlighting the implementation gap between research and healthcare innovation. Lessons from included projects include the need for organisational support, an underpinning mixed-methods implementation strategy and an iterative approach to address clinician feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Digital healthcare innovation has yielded many prototype clinical decision support (CDS) systems, however, few are fully adopted into practice, despite successful research outcomes. We aimed to explore the characteristics of implementations in clinical practice to inform future innovation.

Methods: Web of Science, Trip Database, PubMed, NHS Digital and the BMA website were searched for examples of CDS systems in May 2022 and updated in June 2023. Papers were included if they reported on a CDS giving pathway advice to a clinician, adopted into regular clinical practice and had sufficient published information for analysis. Examples were excluded if they were only used in a research setting or intended for patients. Articles found in citation searches were assessed alongside a detailed hand search of the grey literature to gather all available information, including commercial information. Examples were excluded if there was insufficient information for analysis. The normalisation process theory (NPT) framework informed analysis.

Results: 22 implemented CDS projects were included, with 53 related publications or sources of information (40 peer-reviewed publications and 13 alternative sources). NPT framework analysis indicated organisational support was paramount to successful adoption of CDS. Ensuring that workflows were optimised for patient care alongside iterative, mixed-methods implementation was key to engaging clinicians.

Conclusion: Extensive searches revealed few examples of CDS available for analysis, highlighting the implementation gap between research and healthcare innovation. Lessons from included projects include the need for organisational support, an underpinning mixed-methods implementation strategy and an iterative approach to address clinician feedback.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床决策支持系统实施的哪些特点会导致其被经常采用?范围审查。
介绍:数字医疗创新产生了许多临床决策支持(CDS)系统的原型,然而,尽管研究取得了成功,但完全应用于实践的系统却寥寥无几。我们旨在探索临床实践中的实施特点,为未来的创新提供参考:方法:在 Web of Science、Trip Database、PubMed、NHS Digital 和 BMA 网站上搜索 2022 年 5 月和 2023 年 6 月更新的 CDS 系统实例。如果论文报道了向临床医生提供路径建议的 CDS,并将其应用于常规临床实践,且有足够的已发表信息可供分析,则纳入该论文。如果仅用于研究环境或针对患者,则排除在外。在对灰色文献进行详细手工检索以收集所有可用信息(包括商业信息)的同时,还对引文检索中发现的文章进行了评估。如果没有足够的信息进行分析,则会将例子排除在外。结果:共纳入 22 个已实施的 CDS 项目,53 篇相关出版物或信息来源(40 篇同行评审出版物和 13 篇其他来源)。NPT 框架分析表明,组织支持对于成功采用 CDS 至关重要。在迭代、混合方法实施的同时,确保工作流程为患者护理最优化是吸引临床医生参与的关键:通过广泛的搜索发现,可用于分析的 CDS 案例很少,这凸显了研究与医疗创新之间的实施差距。从所包含的项目中获得的经验包括:组织支持的必要性、混合方法实施策略的基础以及处理临床医生反馈的迭代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scaling equitable artificial intelligence in healthcare with machine learning operations. Understanding prescribing errors for system optimisation: the technology-related error mechanism classification. Detection of hypertension from pharyngeal images using deep learning algorithm in primary care settings in Japan. PubMed captures more fine-grained bibliographic data on scientific commentary than Web of Science: a comparative analysis. Method to apply temporal graph analysis on electronic patient record data to explore healthcare professional-patient interaction intensity: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1