Long COVID among healthcare workers: a narrative review of definitions, prevalence, symptoms, risk factors and impacts.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine British medical bulletin Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1093/bmb/ldae008
Brendan Dempsey, Ira Madan, Sharon A M Stevelink, Danielle Lamb
{"title":"Long COVID among healthcare workers: a narrative review of definitions, prevalence, symptoms, risk factors and impacts.","authors":"Brendan Dempsey, Ira Madan, Sharon A M Stevelink, Danielle Lamb","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long COVID (LC) occurs when people experience symptoms for weeks, months or even years after a COVID-19 infection. This review looks at research exploring the LC definitions, prevalence, symptoms, risk factors, and associated impacts in research on healthcare workers (HCWs).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We systematically searched five electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo and PubMed) and compiled a narrative literature review based on 56 relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>LC is prevalent among HCWs who become infected by COVID-19. Many of the most frequent symptoms associated with LC in the general population are also reported among HCWs. Some risk factors for LC are also similar to those in the general population, such as female sex, older age, and having a pre-existing respiratory illness.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The mechanism(s) responsible for LC remains unknown. A variety of terms, timeframes and symptoms are used to define LC, creating difficulties in comparing results across studies. Much of the research is cross-sectional and fails to explore the impacts that prolonged symptoms have on HCWs' personal and professional lives.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>The need to support HCWs with LC is clear. Identifying the mechanism(s) responsible for LC is a key priority, as this will inform treatments.</p><p><strong>Areas for developing research: </strong>Future research should move towards a standard definition for LC. Greater attention should be paid to longitudinal and qualitative studies, which could give insights into prognosis, lived experience and work participation. Finally, studies evaluating treatments suitable for people with LC are timely.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"16-35"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldae008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Long COVID (LC) occurs when people experience symptoms for weeks, months or even years after a COVID-19 infection. This review looks at research exploring the LC definitions, prevalence, symptoms, risk factors, and associated impacts in research on healthcare workers (HCWs).

Data sources: We systematically searched five electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo and PubMed) and compiled a narrative literature review based on 56 relevant studies.

Areas of agreement: LC is prevalent among HCWs who become infected by COVID-19. Many of the most frequent symptoms associated with LC in the general population are also reported among HCWs. Some risk factors for LC are also similar to those in the general population, such as female sex, older age, and having a pre-existing respiratory illness.

Areas of controversy: The mechanism(s) responsible for LC remains unknown. A variety of terms, timeframes and symptoms are used to define LC, creating difficulties in comparing results across studies. Much of the research is cross-sectional and fails to explore the impacts that prolonged symptoms have on HCWs' personal and professional lives.

Growing points: The need to support HCWs with LC is clear. Identifying the mechanism(s) responsible for LC is a key priority, as this will inform treatments.

Areas for developing research: Future research should move towards a standard definition for LC. Greater attention should be paid to longitudinal and qualitative studies, which could give insights into prognosis, lived experience and work participation. Finally, studies evaluating treatments suitable for people with LC are timely.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员中的长期 COVID:关于定义、流行率、症状、风险因素和影响的叙述性综述。
简介:当人们在感染 COVID-19 后的数周、数月甚至数年内出现症状时,即为长期 COVID(LC)。这篇综述探讨了长COVID的定义、流行率、症状、风险因素以及对医护人员(HCWs)的相关影响:我们系统地检索了五个电子数据库(CINAHL、EMBASE、Medline、PsycInfo 和 PubMed),并在 56 项相关研究的基础上编写了一篇叙述性文献综述:在感染 COVID-19 的人机工程人员中,低血糖症十分普遍。一般人群中与 LC 相关的许多最常见症状在高危职业工人中也有报道。感染 LC 的一些风险因素也与普通人群相似,如女性、年龄较大、之前患有呼吸道疾病等:导致低血氧症的机制仍不清楚。定义 LC 的术语、时间范围和症状多种多样,这给比较不同研究的结果造成了困难。大部分研究都是横断面研究,未能探讨长期症状对高危职业工作者个人和职业生活的影响:为患有慢性淋巴细胞白血病的医护人员提供支持的必要性显而易见。确定导致低血糖的机制是当务之急,因为这将为治疗提供依据:未来的研究应朝着 LC 标准定义的方向发展。应更加重视纵向研究和定性研究,这些研究可以深入了解预后、生活经历和工作参与情况。最后,评估适合 LC 患者的治疗方法的研究也很及时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
期刊最新文献
Management of knee osteoarthritis using bone marrow aspirate concentrate: a systematic review. High-volume injections in Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review. Pediatric wrist fractures: variations in management across countries. An evidence-based summary of evidence. New developments in the diagnosis and management of motor neuron disease. Management of acute severe ulcerative colitis-an update for generalist and specialist clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1