Effects of opioid-sparing general anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.4097/kja.24336
Sun Woo Nam, Sang-Hwan Do, Jung-Won Hwang, Insun Park, Insung Hwang, Hyo-Seok Na
{"title":"Effects of opioid-sparing general anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic gynecological surgery.","authors":"Sun Woo Nam, Sang-Hwan Do, Jung-Won Hwang, Insun Park, Insung Hwang, Hyo-Seok Na","doi":"10.4097/kja.24336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to investigate whether opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to either the opioid-using anesthesia (OUA) or the OSA groups. In the OUA group, remifentanil was administered as an opioid during general anesthesia. In the OSA group, apart from a single dose of 5 μg/kg of alfentanil for tracheal intubation, no other opioids were used. In both groups, a multimodal intravenous non-opioid analgesic regimen was used preferentially in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV, assessed by symptoms until the postoperative day (POD) 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients were included in this study. The incidence of nausea in the PACU was significantly lower in the OSA group compared to in the OUA group (31.7% in the OSA group vs. 51.7% in the OUA group, P = 0.026). Pain scores and the incidence of opioid analgesic administration were lower in the OSA group during PACU stay, resulting in a significantly lower number of patients requiring rescue opioid analgesics (3.3% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in intraoperative vital signs, hemodynamic interventions, or duration of PACU and hospital stay between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OSA significantly reduced postoperative nausea, pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesics in the PACU without increasing hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to either the opioid-using anesthesia (OUA) or the OSA groups. In the OUA group, remifentanil was administered as an opioid during general anesthesia. In the OSA group, apart from a single dose of 5 μg/kg of alfentanil for tracheal intubation, no other opioids were used. In both groups, a multimodal intravenous non-opioid analgesic regimen was used preferentially in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV, assessed by symptoms until the postoperative day (POD) 1.

Results: A total of 120 patients were included in this study. The incidence of nausea in the PACU was significantly lower in the OSA group compared to in the OUA group (31.7% in the OSA group vs. 51.7% in the OUA group, P = 0.026). Pain scores and the incidence of opioid analgesic administration were lower in the OSA group during PACU stay, resulting in a significantly lower number of patients requiring rescue opioid analgesics (3.3% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in intraoperative vital signs, hemodynamic interventions, or duration of PACU and hospital stay between the two groups.

Conclusions: OSA significantly reduced postoperative nausea, pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesics in the PACU without increasing hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
节省阿片类药物的全身麻醉对腹腔镜妇科手术术后恶心和呕吐的影响。
背景:本研究旨在探讨阿片类药物保留麻醉(OSA)能否减轻腹腔镜妇科手术患者的术后恶心和呕吐(PONV):接受择期腹腔镜妇科手术的成人患者被随机分配到使用阿片类药物麻醉(OUA)组或OSA组。在OUA组,全身麻醉期间使用瑞芬太尼作为阿片类药物。在 OSA 组中,除了在气管插管时单次使用 5 μg/kg 阿芬太尼外,没有使用其他阿片类药物。两组患者在麻醉后护理病房(PACU)均优先使用多模式静脉注射非阿片类镇痛方案。主要结果是根据术后第 1 天(POD)前的症状评估 PONV 发生率:本研究共纳入了 120 名患者。与 OUA 组相比,OSA 组在 PACU 中的恶心发生率明显降低(OSA 组为 31.7%,OUA 组为 51.7%,P = 0.026)。在PACU住院期间,OSA组的疼痛评分和阿片类镇痛药用药发生率较低,因此需要阿片类镇痛药抢救的患者人数显著减少(3.3% vs. 18.3%,P = 0.008)。两组患者在术中生命体征、血流动力学干预、PACU和住院时间方面没有明显差异:结论:OSA能明显减轻腹腔镜妇科手术患者的术后恶心、疼痛评分以及在PACU抢救镇痛剂的需求,同时不会增加血液动力学的不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Controlled hypotension under rapid ventricular pacing technique in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a case report. Comparison of postoperative outcomes after cranial neurosurgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea. Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Current evidence on the use of sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade antagonism during electroconvulsive therapy - a narrative review. Dexmedetomidine alleviates CoCl2-induced hypoxic cellular damage in INS-1 cells by regulating autophagy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1