Listen to your heart: Trade-off between cardiac interoceptive processing and visual exteroceptive processing

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING NeuroImage Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120808
{"title":"Listen to your heart: Trade-off between cardiac interoceptive processing and visual exteroceptive processing","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Internal bodily signals, such as heartbeats, can influence conscious perception of external sensory information. Spontaneous shifts of attention between interoception and exteroception have been proposed as the underlying mechanism, but direct evidence is lacking. Here, we used steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) frequency tagging to independently measure the neural processing of visual stimuli that were concurrently presented but varied in heartbeat coupling in healthy participants. Although heartbeat coupling was irrelevant to participants’ task of detecting brief color changes, we found decreased SSVEPs for systole-coupled stimuli and increased SSVEPs for diastole-coupled stimuli, compared to non-coupled stimuli. These results suggest that attentional and representational resources allocated to visual stimuli vary according to fluctuations in cardiac-related signals across the cardiac cycle, reflecting spontaneous and immediate competition between cardiac-related signals and visual events. Furthermore, frequent coupling of visual stimuli with stronger cardiac-related signals not only led to a larger heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) but also resulted in a smaller color change evoked N2 component, with the increase in HEP amplitude associated with a decrease in N2 amplitude. These findings indicate an overall or longer-term increase in brain resources allocated to the internal domain at the expense of reduced resources available for the external domain. Our study highlights the dynamic reallocation of limited processing resources across the internal-external axis and supports the trade-off between interoception and exteroception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811924003057/pdfft?md5=88be4fbcbeaafb9bcf43e40ac4e50928&pid=1-s2.0-S1053811924003057-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811924003057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal bodily signals, such as heartbeats, can influence conscious perception of external sensory information. Spontaneous shifts of attention between interoception and exteroception have been proposed as the underlying mechanism, but direct evidence is lacking. Here, we used steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) frequency tagging to independently measure the neural processing of visual stimuli that were concurrently presented but varied in heartbeat coupling in healthy participants. Although heartbeat coupling was irrelevant to participants’ task of detecting brief color changes, we found decreased SSVEPs for systole-coupled stimuli and increased SSVEPs for diastole-coupled stimuli, compared to non-coupled stimuli. These results suggest that attentional and representational resources allocated to visual stimuli vary according to fluctuations in cardiac-related signals across the cardiac cycle, reflecting spontaneous and immediate competition between cardiac-related signals and visual events. Furthermore, frequent coupling of visual stimuli with stronger cardiac-related signals not only led to a larger heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) but also resulted in a smaller color change evoked N2 component, with the increase in HEP amplitude associated with a decrease in N2 amplitude. These findings indicate an overall or longer-term increase in brain resources allocated to the internal domain at the expense of reduced resources available for the external domain. Our study highlights the dynamic reallocation of limited processing resources across the internal-external axis and supports the trade-off between interoception and exteroception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倾听心脏的声音心脏内感知处理与视觉外感知处理之间的权衡。
内部身体信号(如心跳)可影响对外部感官信息的有意识感知。有人提出,内感知和外感知之间注意力的自发转移是其基本机制,但缺乏直接证据。在这里,我们使用稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)频率标记来独立测量健康参与者对同时呈现但心跳耦合不同的视觉刺激的神经处理。虽然心跳耦合与参与者检测短暂颜色变化的任务无关,但与非耦合刺激相比,我们发现收缩耦合刺激的 SSVEPs 下降,而舒张耦合刺激的 SSVEPs 上升。这些结果表明,分配给视觉刺激的注意力和表象资源会随着整个心脏周期中心脏相关信号的波动而变化,这反映了心脏相关信号和视觉事件之间自发和直接的竞争。此外,视觉刺激与较强的心脏相关信号频繁耦合不仅会导致较大的心跳诱发电位(HEP),还会导致较小的颜色变化诱发的 N2 分量,HEP 振幅的增加与 N2 振幅的减小有关。这些研究结果表明,分配给内部领域的大脑资源总体或长期增加,但外部领域的可用资源却减少了。我们的研究强调了有限的处理资源在内外轴之间的动态再分配,并支持内感知和外感知之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in cerebral small vessel disease: an integrative multi‑omics study. Sleep-spindles as a marker of attention and intelligence in dogs. Cerebral blood flow and arterial transit time responses to exercise training in older adults. Decoding Cortical Chronotopy - Comparing the Influence of Different Cortical Organizational Schemes. Neurophysiological dynamics of metacontrol states: EEG insights into conflict regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1