David M. Brown MD , Glenn J. Jaffe MD , Charles C. Wykoff MD, PhD , Eser Adiguzel PhD , Jeffrey S. Heier MD , Arshad M. Khanani MD, MA
{"title":"MERLIN: Two-Year Results of Brolucizumab in Participants with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistent Retinal Fluid","authors":"David M. Brown MD , Glenn J. Jaffe MD , Charles C. Wykoff MD, PhD , Eser Adiguzel PhD , Jeffrey S. Heier MD , Arshad M. Khanani MD, MA","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To report the safety and efficacy of brolucizumab (Beovu) 6 mg versus aflibercept (Eylea) 2 mg administered every 4 weeks in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and persistent retinal fluid after the week 52 up to week 104.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Multicenter, randomized, double-masked phase 3a study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants with recalcitrant nAMD (persistent residual retinal fluid despite previous frequent anti-VEGF treatment).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Study eyes were randomized 2:1 to intravitreal brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks for 100 weeks or until study termination.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>All available efficacy (analysis of noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], central subfield thickness [CST], fluid-free status [no intraretinal fluid and no subretinal fluid]) and safety data up to study termination, including data up to week 104 for those participants who completed the study before its termination. All <em>P</em> values after week 52 were nominal and reflect observed data for the efficacy analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior to aflibercept 2 mg in mean BCVA change from baseline to week 104 (least squares mean difference, –0.4 ETDRS letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], –3.7 to 3.0; <em>P</em> = 0.0169). The proportion of eyes with ≥15-letter loss was 6.2% for brolucizumab and 4.7% for aflibercept (<em>P</em> = 0.7762), and a greater proportion of eyes were fluid free at week 104 (52.5% brolucizumab vs. 28.2% aflibercept; 95% CI, 11.9−37.3; <em>P</em> < 0.001) in eyes treated with brolucizumab versus aflibercept. Incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was 11.5% (0.8% and 2.2%) for brolucizumab versus 6.1% (0% and 0.6%) for aflibercept.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Consistent with 52-week results, brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior in mean BCVA change, with anatomic outcomes superior to aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks from baseline to week 104 or study termination. The incidence of IOI, including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was higher with brolucizumab versus aflibercept; therefore, brolucizumab should not be used more frequently than every 8 weeks after the loading regimen.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":"132 2","pages":"Pages 131-140"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642024005165","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To report the safety and efficacy of brolucizumab (Beovu) 6 mg versus aflibercept (Eylea) 2 mg administered every 4 weeks in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and persistent retinal fluid after the week 52 up to week 104.
Study eyes were randomized 2:1 to intravitreal brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks for 100 weeks or until study termination.
Main Outcome Measures
All available efficacy (analysis of noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], central subfield thickness [CST], fluid-free status [no intraretinal fluid and no subretinal fluid]) and safety data up to study termination, including data up to week 104 for those participants who completed the study before its termination. All P values after week 52 were nominal and reflect observed data for the efficacy analyses.
Results
Brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior to aflibercept 2 mg in mean BCVA change from baseline to week 104 (least squares mean difference, –0.4 ETDRS letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], –3.7 to 3.0; P = 0.0169). The proportion of eyes with ≥15-letter loss was 6.2% for brolucizumab and 4.7% for aflibercept (P = 0.7762), and a greater proportion of eyes were fluid free at week 104 (52.5% brolucizumab vs. 28.2% aflibercept; 95% CI, 11.9−37.3; P < 0.001) in eyes treated with brolucizumab versus aflibercept. Incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was 11.5% (0.8% and 2.2%) for brolucizumab versus 6.1% (0% and 0.6%) for aflibercept.
Conclusions
Consistent with 52-week results, brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior in mean BCVA change, with anatomic outcomes superior to aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks from baseline to week 104 or study termination. The incidence of IOI, including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was higher with brolucizumab versus aflibercept; therefore, brolucizumab should not be used more frequently than every 8 weeks after the loading regimen.
Financial Disclosure(s)
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
期刊介绍:
The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.