Sonya M Kothadia, Eric E Cober, Christine E Koval, Jem M Golbin, Susan Harrington, Cyndee Miranda, Lauryn A Benninger, Jona M Banzon
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of lung transplant recipients with pre-transplant Mycobacterium avium complex infection.","authors":"Sonya M Kothadia, Eric E Cober, Christine E Koval, Jem M Golbin, Susan Harrington, Cyndee Miranda, Lauryn A Benninger, Jona M Banzon","doi":"10.1111/tid.14361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at risk for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections, in part due to the presence of structural lung disease pre-transplant and relatively higher levels of immunosuppression post-transplant. There is a lack of data regarding outcomes of LTR with MAC infections pre-transplant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who received lung transplants (LTs) from 2013 to 2020 with 1) evidence of MAC on culture or polymerase chain reaction before or at the time of transplant or 2) granulomas on explant pathology and positive acid-fast bacillus stains with no other mycobacteria identified. Patients were deemed to have MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) if they met the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (14/882, 2%) met inclusion criteria. Seven patients (7/14, 50%) had pre-transplant MAC-PD, four of whom had cavitary disease. None of the 14 patients had smear-positive cultures at the time of transplant. Two patients in our cohort received treatment for MAC before transplant. Thirteen patients were bilateral LTR (13/14, 93%). One single LTR was the sole patient to receive MAC treatment post-transplant. No patients developed MAC-PD after transplant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bilateral LTR in our cohort did not develop MAC-PD despite not receiving MAC treatment post-transplant. It is possible source control was achieved with native lung explantation. Our observations suggest patients may not uniformly require pre- or post-transplant MAC treatment if they are smear-negative and undergo bilateral LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at risk for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections, in part due to the presence of structural lung disease pre-transplant and relatively higher levels of immunosuppression post-transplant. There is a lack of data regarding outcomes of LTR with MAC infections pre-transplant.
Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who received lung transplants (LTs) from 2013 to 2020 with 1) evidence of MAC on culture or polymerase chain reaction before or at the time of transplant or 2) granulomas on explant pathology and positive acid-fast bacillus stains with no other mycobacteria identified. Patients were deemed to have MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) if they met the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America criteria.
Results: Fourteen patients (14/882, 2%) met inclusion criteria. Seven patients (7/14, 50%) had pre-transplant MAC-PD, four of whom had cavitary disease. None of the 14 patients had smear-positive cultures at the time of transplant. Two patients in our cohort received treatment for MAC before transplant. Thirteen patients were bilateral LTR (13/14, 93%). One single LTR was the sole patient to receive MAC treatment post-transplant. No patients developed MAC-PD after transplant.
Conclusion: The bilateral LTR in our cohort did not develop MAC-PD despite not receiving MAC treatment post-transplant. It is possible source control was achieved with native lung explantation. Our observations suggest patients may not uniformly require pre- or post-transplant MAC treatment if they are smear-negative and undergo bilateral LT.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.