Assessment of Voice Quality and Vocal Cord Paralysis After Endarterectomy.

IF 2.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Health and Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S465573
Karolina Dorobisz, Tadeusz Dorobisz, Katarzyna Pazdro-Zastawny, Marzena Kubacka, Sara Janczak, Dariusz Janczak
{"title":"Assessment of Voice Quality and Vocal Cord Paralysis After Endarterectomy.","authors":"Karolina Dorobisz, Tadeusz Dorobisz, Katarzyna Pazdro-Zastawny, Marzena Kubacka, Sara Janczak, Dariusz Janczak","doi":"10.2147/VHRM.S465573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is a rare but important complication after endarterectomy (CEA). The impact on voice quality after this procedure is also important. The aim of the study was to assess voice quality and vocal cord function after CEA.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>200 patients were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were indications for CEA and patient consent to the procedure. Endoscopic examination of the larynx was performed before the procedure, immediately after the procedure, on the 2nd day after the procedure, then 3 month and 6 months after the procedure. Voice was assessed by maximum phonation time (MPT), GRBAS scale, Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study group, the results on the GRBAS scale were significantly worse and the average MPT was shorter compared to the control group. In the V-RQOL assessment, patients rated their voice as fair or good, significantly more often noticed that they had difficulty speaking loudly and being heard, and that they felt short of air when speaking. In VHI-30, the total score was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group. Voice disorders after the procedure were reported by 68 patients, while a disorder of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was observed immediately after the procedure in 32 patients. Most vocal cord disorders were transient. Ultimately, 3% of patients were diagnosed with vocal cord paralysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cranial nerves paralysis, including the recurrent laryngeal nerve, are a common complication after CEA. Majority the paralysis is transient, but requires appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Vocal cord evaluation is a non-invasive and widely available examination and should be performed pre- and postoperatively after all neck surgeries. The incidence of voice disorders after CEA significantly affects the quality of life of patients and requires voice rehabilitation and patient care with psychological support.</p>","PeriodicalId":23597,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","volume":"20 ","pages":"369-375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S465573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is a rare but important complication after endarterectomy (CEA). The impact on voice quality after this procedure is also important. The aim of the study was to assess voice quality and vocal cord function after CEA.

Material and methods: 200 patients were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were indications for CEA and patient consent to the procedure. Endoscopic examination of the larynx was performed before the procedure, immediately after the procedure, on the 2nd day after the procedure, then 3 month and 6 months after the procedure. Voice was assessed by maximum phonation time (MPT), GRBAS scale, Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) questionnaire.

Results: In the study group, the results on the GRBAS scale were significantly worse and the average MPT was shorter compared to the control group. In the V-RQOL assessment, patients rated their voice as fair or good, significantly more often noticed that they had difficulty speaking loudly and being heard, and that they felt short of air when speaking. In VHI-30, the total score was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group. Voice disorders after the procedure were reported by 68 patients, while a disorder of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was observed immediately after the procedure in 32 patients. Most vocal cord disorders were transient. Ultimately, 3% of patients were diagnosed with vocal cord paralysis.

Conclusion: Cranial nerves paralysis, including the recurrent laryngeal nerve, are a common complication after CEA. Majority the paralysis is transient, but requires appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Vocal cord evaluation is a non-invasive and widely available examination and should be performed pre- and postoperatively after all neck surgeries. The incidence of voice disorders after CEA significantly affects the quality of life of patients and requires voice rehabilitation and patient care with psychological support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估声带内膜切除术后的嗓音质量和声带麻痹。
简介:喉返神经麻痹是喉内膜切除术(CEA)后一种罕见但重要的并发症。手术后对嗓音质量的影响也很重要。研究旨在评估 CEA 术后的嗓音质量和声带功能。纳入标准是CEA的适应症和患者同意接受手术。术前、术后即刻、术后第2天、术后3个月和6个月分别进行喉部内窥镜检查。通过最大发音时间(MPT)、GRBAS量表、嗓音障碍指数(VHI)和嗓音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)问卷对嗓音进行评估:与对照组相比,研究组的 GRBAS 量表结果明显更差,平均 MPT 更短。在 V-RQOL 评估中,患者将自己的嗓音评为一般或良好,明显更常注意到自己难以大声说话并被人听到,以及说话时感到气短。在 VHI-30 中,研究组的总分明显高于对照组。68 名患者在手术后出现嗓音障碍,32 名患者在手术后立即出现喉返神经障碍。大多数声带障碍都是一过性的。最终,3% 的患者被诊断为声带麻痹:结论:包括喉返神经在内的颅神经麻痹是 CEA 术后常见的并发症。大多数麻痹是一过性的,但需要进行适当的诊断和治疗。声带评估是一种无创检查,可广泛应用于所有颈部手术的术前和术后检查。颈部手术后嗓音障碍的发生率会严重影响患者的生活质量,因此需要进行嗓音康复和患者心理支持护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular Health and Risk Management
Vascular Health and Risk Management PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies on the processes involved in the maintenance of vascular health; the monitoring, prevention, and treatment of vascular disease and its sequelae; and the involvement of metabolic disorders, particularly diabetes. In addition, the journal will also seek to define drug usage in terms of ultimate uptake and acceptance by the patient and healthcare professional.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of Hypertension Based on Anthropometric Parameters in Adolescents in Eastern Sudan: A Community-Based Study. Characteristic of 24-Hour Blood Pressure Dipping Patterns in Hypertensive Stroke Patients. Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Is This Light at the End of the Tunnel? Misdiagnosis of Chronic Heart Failure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Report of Two Cases and Literature Review. Clinical Accuracy of the G.LAB MD41A0 Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor in Pregnancy and Pre-Eclampsia Using the AAMI/ESH/ISO as Reference Standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1