Real-world implementation of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise: what do football teams modify and why?

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001982

Torstein Dalen-Lorentsen, James O'Brien, Joar Harøy

{"title":"Real-world implementation of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise: what do football teams modify and why?","authors":"Torstein Dalen-Lorentsen, James O'Brien, Joar Harøy","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the use and modification of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise in football (soccer) teams, including the reasons for modification and alternate injury-prevention strategies.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, staff members from a convenience sample of 50 male elite, academy and amateur football teams in Norway, Germany and Austria completed an online questionnaire focussing on the implementation of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise. Fourteen of the staff members also completed an interview.Results: Forty-two teams (84%) reported using the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise, but the majority (65%) had modified the original programme. Modifications included changes to sets, repetitions, progressions and frequency and were particularly common among elite teams. The main reasons for modifications were managing overall player load, experiences and beliefs and individualisation. Despite modifications, all teams followed the basic principles of the original programme.Conclusion: The adoption of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise by football teams is high, but the vast majority of teams modify the programme. Despite these modifications, the basic principles of the programme are maintained.","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use and modification of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise in football (soccer) teams, including the reasons for modification and alternate injury-prevention strategies.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, staff members from a convenience sample of 50 male elite, academy and amateur football teams in Norway, Germany and Austria completed an online questionnaire focussing on the implementation of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise. Fourteen of the staff members also completed an interview.

Results: Forty-two teams (84%) reported using the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise, but the majority (65%) had modified the original programme. Modifications included changes to sets, repetitions, progressions and frequency and were particularly common among elite teams. The main reasons for modifications were managing overall player load, experiences and beliefs and individualisation. Despite modifications, all teams followed the basic principles of the original programme.

Conclusion: The adoption of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise by football teams is high, but the vast majority of teams modify the programme. Despite these modifications, the basic principles of the programme are maintained.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

哥本哈根屈伸运动的实际应用：足球队修改了什么，为什么？

目的评估哥本哈根外展训练在足球队中的使用和修改情况，包括修改的原因和其他预防受伤策略：在这项横断面研究中，来自挪威、德国和奥地利的 50 支男子精英足球队、学院足球队和业余足球队的工作人员完成了一份在线问卷，重点是哥本哈根外展训练的实施情况。其中 14 名工作人员还完成了一次访谈：结果：42 支球队（84%）报告使用了哥本哈根外展训练，但大多数球队（65%）对原始计划进行了修改。修改包括改变组数、重复次数、渐进性和频率，在精英团队中尤为常见。修改的主要原因是管理球员的总体负荷、经验和信念以及个性化。尽管进行了修改，但所有球队都遵循了原计划的基本原则：结论：足球队采用哥本哈根引体向上运动的比例很高，但绝大多数球队都对该计划进行了修改。尽管进行了这些修改，但该计划的基本原则仍得以保留。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊