Marlous Marianne Beate Cardinaal , Omid Daqiq , Bram Barteld Jan Merema, Baucke van Minnen
{"title":"Patient satisfaction after conservative treatment of anterior wall frontal sinus fractures","authors":"Marlous Marianne Beate Cardinaal , Omid Daqiq , Bram Barteld Jan Merema, Baucke van Minnen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to determine patient forehead aesthetics satisfaction after conservative treatment of non-dislocated and dislocated anterior wall frontal sinus fractures.</div><div>Prospectively, patients older than 15 years of age with a frontal sinus fracture, treated conservatively between the period of 2010–2020, were analysed. The Face-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, and the fracture dimensional properties were measured using computed tomography. The results were compared with a matched non-fractured control group.</div><div>The mean total Face-Q questionnaire score was 114.77 (SD = 17.38) versus 114.23 (SD = 15.23) (research-versus control group, respectively), with a mean difference of 0.55 (SD = 4.85), which was not significant (p = 0.91). The size of impression area did not appear to have a linear relationship with patient satisfaction within the entire population (p = 0.87; r = 0.00). Presence of a scar in the fracture site was a significant predictor of patient satisfaction, contributing to 31% of the entire population's overall score (p = 0.01) and 57% in the dislocated fracture population (p = 0.003).</div><div>The conservatively treated patients’ satisfaction score was comparable to the control group. A higher satisfaction score after a conservative treatment is associated with the absence of a scar on the fracture site, even with dislocations up to 6 mm at the deepest impression point.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"52 11","pages":"Pages 1228-1234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224002300","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to determine patient forehead aesthetics satisfaction after conservative treatment of non-dislocated and dislocated anterior wall frontal sinus fractures.
Prospectively, patients older than 15 years of age with a frontal sinus fracture, treated conservatively between the period of 2010–2020, were analysed. The Face-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, and the fracture dimensional properties were measured using computed tomography. The results were compared with a matched non-fractured control group.
The mean total Face-Q questionnaire score was 114.77 (SD = 17.38) versus 114.23 (SD = 15.23) (research-versus control group, respectively), with a mean difference of 0.55 (SD = 4.85), which was not significant (p = 0.91). The size of impression area did not appear to have a linear relationship with patient satisfaction within the entire population (p = 0.87; r = 0.00). Presence of a scar in the fracture site was a significant predictor of patient satisfaction, contributing to 31% of the entire population's overall score (p = 0.01) and 57% in the dislocated fracture population (p = 0.003).
The conservatively treated patients’ satisfaction score was comparable to the control group. A higher satisfaction score after a conservative treatment is associated with the absence of a scar on the fracture site, even with dislocations up to 6 mm at the deepest impression point.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included:
• Distraction osteogenesis
• Synthetic bone substitutes
• Fibroblast growth factors
• Fetal wound healing
• Skull base surgery
• Computer-assisted surgery
• Vascularized bone grafts