Target mechanisms of mindfulness-based programmes and practices: a scoping review.

0 PSYCHIATRY BMJ mental health Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300955
Shannon Maloney, Merle Kock, Yasmijn Slaghekke, Lucy Radley, Alba Lopez-Montoyo, Jesus Montero-Marin, Willem Kuyken
{"title":"Target mechanisms of mindfulness-based programmes and practices: a scoping review.","authors":"Shannon Maloney, Merle Kock, Yasmijn Slaghekke, Lucy Radley, Alba Lopez-Montoyo, Jesus Montero-Marin, Willem Kuyken","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2023-300955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) and practices have demonstrated effects in mental health and well-being, yet questions regarding the target mechanisms that drive change across the population remain unresolved.</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>Five databases were searched for randomised controlled trials that evaluate the indirect effects (IEs) of an MBP or mindfulness practice in relation to mental health and well-being outcomes through psychological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>27 eligible studies were identified, with only four exploring mechanisms in the context of specific mindfulness practices. Significant IEs were reported for mindfulness skills, decentering and attitudes of mindfulness (eg, self-compassion) across different outcomes, population samples, mental health strategies and active comparators. Evidence gap maps and requirements for testing and reporting IEs are provided to help guide future work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mindfulness skills, decentering and attitudes of mindfulness may be key intervention targets for addressing the mental health of whole populations. However, future work needs to address significant knowledge gaps regarding the evidence for alternative mechanisms (eg, attention and awareness) in relation to unique outcomes (eg, well-being), mental health strategies (ie, promotion) and active comparators. High-quality trials, with powered multivariate mediation analyses that meet key requirements, will be needed to advance this area of work.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>10.17605/OSF.IO/NY2AH.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question: Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) and practices have demonstrated effects in mental health and well-being, yet questions regarding the target mechanisms that drive change across the population remain unresolved.

Study selection and analysis: Five databases were searched for randomised controlled trials that evaluate the indirect effects (IEs) of an MBP or mindfulness practice in relation to mental health and well-being outcomes through psychological mechanisms.

Findings: 27 eligible studies were identified, with only four exploring mechanisms in the context of specific mindfulness practices. Significant IEs were reported for mindfulness skills, decentering and attitudes of mindfulness (eg, self-compassion) across different outcomes, population samples, mental health strategies and active comparators. Evidence gap maps and requirements for testing and reporting IEs are provided to help guide future work.

Conclusions: Mindfulness skills, decentering and attitudes of mindfulness may be key intervention targets for addressing the mental health of whole populations. However, future work needs to address significant knowledge gaps regarding the evidence for alternative mechanisms (eg, attention and awareness) in relation to unique outcomes (eg, well-being), mental health strategies (ie, promotion) and active comparators. High-quality trials, with powered multivariate mediation analyses that meet key requirements, will be needed to advance this area of work.

Trial registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NY2AH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以正念为基础的计划和实践的目标机制:范围界定审查。
问题:以正念为基础的计划(MBPs)和实践已证明对心理健康和幸福有影响,但有关推动整个人群变化的目标机制的问题仍未解决:研究选择与分析:我们在五个数据库中搜索了随机对照试验,这些试验通过心理机制评估了正念疗法或正念实践对心理健康和幸福感结果的间接影响(IEs)。研究结果:我们确定了 27 项符合条件的研究,其中只有四项研究探讨了特定正念实践的机制。在不同的结果、人群样本、心理健康策略和积极的比较对象中,正念技能、去中心化和正念态度(如自我同情)都有显著的IEs。本文提供了证据差距图以及测试和报告 IEs 的要求,以帮助指导今后的工作:结论:正念技能、去中心化和正念态度可能是解决整个人群心理健康问题的关键干预目标。然而,未来的工作需要解决在替代机制(如注意力和意识)与独特结果(如幸福感)、心理健康策略(如促进)和积极的比较对象相关的证据方面存在的重大知识差距。要推进这一领域的工作,需要进行高质量的试验,并进行符合关键要求的多变量中介分析。试验登记号:10.17605/OSF.IO/NY2AH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in sleep patterns in people with a history of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: a natural experiment. Mediation-adjusted multivariable Mendelian randomisation study identified novel metabolites related to mental health. Identifying postpartum depression: Using key risk factors for early detection. Using the South African Depression Scale (SADS) to measure depressive symptoms in a UK sample. Cumulative ADHD medication use and risk of type 2 diabetes in adults: a Swedish Register study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1