Jeannine M Miranne, Iwona Gabriel, Maura Kelly, Alexa Courtepatte, Vatche A Minassian
{"title":"Prevalence of urinary incontinence and prolapse after hysterectomy for benign disease versus gynecologic malignancy.","authors":"Jeannine M Miranne, Iwona Gabriel, Maura Kelly, Alexa Courtepatte, Vatche A Minassian","doi":"10.5603/gpl.98184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the prevalence of UI and POP after hysterectomy for benign disease and gynecologic malignancy. This is a retrospective cohort chart review study. Two major urban tertiary care centers between 2006-2010. Women ≥ 18 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign or malignant indications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Presence of UI and POP was based on patient report in clinic notes, ICD-9 UI and POP diagnosis codes, and CPT codes for treatment. Prevalence of UI and POP after hysterectomy and time to development of UI and POP after hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1363 (55%) women underwent hysterectomy for benign disease while 1107 (45%) had a hysterectomy for malignancy. Postoperative prevalence of UI and POP in the benign versus the malignant group was 15.1% vs 11.1% (p = 0.001), and 12.1% vs 2.8%, (p < 0.001), respectively. The median time to development of UI in the subset of patients without preoperative UI was 3.5 years in the benign group vs 3 years in the malignant group (p < 0.001). The median time to development of POP in the subset of patients without preoperative POP was 5 years in the benign group and 3.5 years in the malignant group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of developing UI or POP between groups after adjusting for confounders or when accounting for pre-hysterectomy UI or POP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When pre-hysterectomy UI or POP is taken into consideration, there is no difference in the prevalence of post-hysterectomy UI or POP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.98184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of UI and POP after hysterectomy for benign disease and gynecologic malignancy. This is a retrospective cohort chart review study. Two major urban tertiary care centers between 2006-2010. Women ≥ 18 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign or malignant indications.
Material and methods: Presence of UI and POP was based on patient report in clinic notes, ICD-9 UI and POP diagnosis codes, and CPT codes for treatment. Prevalence of UI and POP after hysterectomy and time to development of UI and POP after hysterectomy.
Results: 1363 (55%) women underwent hysterectomy for benign disease while 1107 (45%) had a hysterectomy for malignancy. Postoperative prevalence of UI and POP in the benign versus the malignant group was 15.1% vs 11.1% (p = 0.001), and 12.1% vs 2.8%, (p < 0.001), respectively. The median time to development of UI in the subset of patients without preoperative UI was 3.5 years in the benign group vs 3 years in the malignant group (p < 0.001). The median time to development of POP in the subset of patients without preoperative POP was 5 years in the benign group and 3.5 years in the malignant group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of developing UI or POP between groups after adjusting for confounders or when accounting for pre-hysterectomy UI or POP.
Conclusions: When pre-hysterectomy UI or POP is taken into consideration, there is no difference in the prevalence of post-hysterectomy UI or POP.