Matched-pair long-term survival analysis of male and female patients with breast cancer: a population-based study.

Miao Mo, Xiaoshuang Feng, Chunxiao Wu, Yangming Gong, Jie Shen, Yulian He, Changming Zhou, Zezhou Wang, Chen Fu, Ying Zheng
{"title":"Matched-pair long-term survival analysis of male and female patients with breast cancer: a population-based study.","authors":"Miao Mo, Xiaoshuang Feng, Chunxiao Wu, Yangming Gong, Jie Shen, Yulian He, Changming Zhou, Zezhou Wang, Chen Fu, Ying Zheng","doi":"10.21037/tbcr-24-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies found that the long-term survival of male breast cancer patients differed from those of female patients, however, the conclusions were contradictory. We conducted the study to examine the sex disparity in breast cancer survival by carefully controlling demographic and clinical factors using data from the Shanghai Cancer Registry (SCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Every male breast cancer patient was matched with four female patients by the diagnosis year, age, stage, and histology. We used Kaplan-Meier survival estimates to calculate the cumulative observed overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates and log-rank tests to compare the survival rates by sex. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression models to assess the association between sex and risk of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50,958 patients with breast cancer (0.85% male) were registered in the SCR between 2002 and 2013. After matching, 434 male and 1,736 female patients were included in the study. With a median follow-up of 10 years, men with breast cancer showed worse OS (P<0.001) and CSS (P<0.001) than did women. The 5- and 10-year OS rates for male and female patients were 67.27% and 77.75%, and 45.95% and 62.60%, respectively; the 5- and 10-year CSS rates for male and female patients were 70.19% and 79.79%, and 50.57% and 67.20%, respectively. Compared with women, men had 65% increased risk of overall death [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-1.92] and 70% increased risk of cancer-specific death (95% CI: 1.44-2.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found male patients with breast cancer had poorer long-term survival than women in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":101427,"journal":{"name":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","volume":"5 ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tbcr-24-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies found that the long-term survival of male breast cancer patients differed from those of female patients, however, the conclusions were contradictory. We conducted the study to examine the sex disparity in breast cancer survival by carefully controlling demographic and clinical factors using data from the Shanghai Cancer Registry (SCR).

Methods: Every male breast cancer patient was matched with four female patients by the diagnosis year, age, stage, and histology. We used Kaplan-Meier survival estimates to calculate the cumulative observed overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates and log-rank tests to compare the survival rates by sex. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression models to assess the association between sex and risk of death.

Results: A total of 50,958 patients with breast cancer (0.85% male) were registered in the SCR between 2002 and 2013. After matching, 434 male and 1,736 female patients were included in the study. With a median follow-up of 10 years, men with breast cancer showed worse OS (P<0.001) and CSS (P<0.001) than did women. The 5- and 10-year OS rates for male and female patients were 67.27% and 77.75%, and 45.95% and 62.60%, respectively; the 5- and 10-year CSS rates for male and female patients were 70.19% and 79.79%, and 50.57% and 67.20%, respectively. Compared with women, men had 65% increased risk of overall death [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-1.92] and 70% increased risk of cancer-specific death (95% CI: 1.44-2.00).

Conclusions: This study found male patients with breast cancer had poorer long-term survival than women in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌男女患者配对长期生存分析:一项基于人群的研究。
背景:以往的研究发现,男性乳腺癌患者的长期生存率与女性有所不同,但结论却相互矛盾。我们利用上海肿瘤登记中心(SCR)的数据,通过仔细控制人口统计学和临床因素,对乳腺癌生存率的性别差异进行了研究:方法:按照确诊年份、年龄、分期和组织学,将每名男性乳腺癌患者与四名女性患者配对。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存估计值计算累计观察总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS),并使用对数秩检验比较不同性别的生存率。我们使用 Cox 比例危险回归模型来评估性别与死亡风险之间的关系:2002年至2013年间,SCR共登记了50958名乳腺癌患者(男性占0.85%)。经过匹配后,434 名男性患者和 1736 名女性患者被纳入研究。中位随访时间为10年,男性乳腺癌患者的OS较差(PConclusions:本研究发现,中国男性乳腺癌患者的长期生存率低于女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Passage dependence of NADH redox status and reactive oxygen species level in vitro in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines with different invasiveness. Precision medicine for breast cancer: advances and challenges. Strategies for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive HER2-low breast cancer based on clinical practice: a round table discussion. Breast ultrasound knobology and the knobology of twinkling for marker detection. Regulation of PI3K signaling in cancer metabolism and PI3K-targeting therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1