A Directed Content Analysis for Greatest Problems Among People With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.008
Emily Dudek BS , Michael W. Williams PhD , Chung Lin (Novelle) Kew PhD , Annalyn DeMello PhD, MPH, RN , Brittany Wright PhD , Alexandra B. Holland LMSW , Alyssa Day-Gorman MA , Alexa S. Gonzalez MS , Luis Leon Novelo PhD , Xiangyi Liu MS , Shannon B. Juengst PhD, CRC
{"title":"A Directed Content Analysis for Greatest Problems Among People With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury","authors":"Emily Dudek BS ,&nbsp;Michael W. Williams PhD ,&nbsp;Chung Lin (Novelle) Kew PhD ,&nbsp;Annalyn DeMello PhD, MPH, RN ,&nbsp;Brittany Wright PhD ,&nbsp;Alexandra B. Holland LMSW ,&nbsp;Alyssa Day-Gorman MA ,&nbsp;Alexa S. Gonzalez MS ,&nbsp;Luis Leon Novelo PhD ,&nbsp;Xiangyi Liu MS ,&nbsp;Shannon B. Juengst PhD, CRC","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize the greatest problem or need among individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), as compared with individuals with a history of other neurologic conditions, mental health conditions, and no history of neurologic or mental health conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A directed content analysis of open-text responses to a single online survey question using a framework guided by the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Community.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A total of 2861 community-dwelling adults (n=274 with TBI; n=289 with other neurologic conditions besides TBI; n=454 with mental health conditions but no neurologic conditions; and n=1844 controls).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Open-text responses to the survey prompt: “<em>What was your greatest problem or need over the past 2 weeks?</em>”</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Participation index comprised the greatest proportion of responses across all 4 participant groups. A quarter (25.4%) of controls reported None (no problem/need), whereas only 7.9%-10.7% of participants in all other groups reported None. Among all groups, individuals with TBI reported the greatest proportion of problems in the Adjustment and Ability indices. Among people with TBI, Money Management (19.7%), None (10.6%), and Anxiety (7.7%) were the 3 most frequently reported problems. Compared with individuals with mild TBI (mTBI), individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI (msTBI) reported a higher proportion of problems in the Ability and Adjustment indices. Among individuals with msTBI, the Adjustment index accounted for the greatest proportion of problems.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study employed a person-centered approach to understanding the greatest needs among individuals with TBI. Qualitative differences were observed between individuals with and without TBI, between people with mTBI and msTBI, and across genders among people with TBI. These findings can help guide research and policy toward addressing challenges perceived as highly important by people living in the community with TBI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 1","pages":"Pages 42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324011869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the greatest problem or need among individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), as compared with individuals with a history of other neurologic conditions, mental health conditions, and no history of neurologic or mental health conditions.

Design

A directed content analysis of open-text responses to a single online survey question using a framework guided by the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4.

Setting

Community.

Participants

A total of 2861 community-dwelling adults (n=274 with TBI; n=289 with other neurologic conditions besides TBI; n=454 with mental health conditions but no neurologic conditions; and n=1844 controls).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Open-text responses to the survey prompt: “What was your greatest problem or need over the past 2 weeks?

Results

The Participation index comprised the greatest proportion of responses across all 4 participant groups. A quarter (25.4%) of controls reported None (no problem/need), whereas only 7.9%-10.7% of participants in all other groups reported None. Among all groups, individuals with TBI reported the greatest proportion of problems in the Adjustment and Ability indices. Among people with TBI, Money Management (19.7%), None (10.6%), and Anxiety (7.7%) were the 3 most frequently reported problems. Compared with individuals with mild TBI (mTBI), individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI (msTBI) reported a higher proportion of problems in the Ability and Adjustment indices. Among individuals with msTBI, the Adjustment index accounted for the greatest proportion of problems.

Conclusions

This study employed a person-centered approach to understanding the greatest needs among individuals with TBI. Qualitative differences were observed between individuals with and without TBI, between people with mTBI and msTBI, and across genders among people with TBI. These findings can help guide research and policy toward addressing challenges perceived as highly important by people living in the community with TBI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对脑损伤患者和非脑损伤患者最大问题的定向内容分析。
目标:将有脑外伤(TBI)病史的人与有其他神经系统病史、精神健康病史以及无神经系统病史或精神健康病史的人进行比较,找出他们最大的问题或需求:设计:采用 Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 框架,对单个在线调查问题的开放文本回复进行定向内容分析:参与者:2861 名居住在社区的成年人(n = 274 名患有创伤性脑损伤;n = 289 名患有创伤性脑损伤以外的其他神经系统疾病;n = 454 名患有精神疾病但无神经系统疾病;n = 1844 名对照组):主要结果测量:对调查提示的开放文本回答:"结果:"在过去两周内,您最大的问题或需求是什么?在所有四个参与者组别中,参与指数所占比例最大。四分之一(25.4%)的对照组参与者表示 "无"(没有问题/需求),而所有其他组别中仅有 7.9 -10.7% 的参与者表示 "无"。在所有组别中,患有创伤性脑损伤的人在适应和能力指数中报告的问题比例最高。在有创伤性脑损伤的人中,"理财"(19.7%)、"无"(10.6%)和 "焦虑"(7.7%)是最常报告的三个问题。与轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者相比,中重度创伤性脑损伤(msTBI)患者在能力指数和适应指数中报告的问题比例更高。在msTBI患者中,适应指数所占的问题比例最大:本研究采用了以人为本的方法来了解创伤性脑损伤患者的最大需求。在患有和未患有创伤性脑损伤的个体之间、患有 mTBI 和 msTBI 的个体之间,以及不同性别的创伤性脑损伤患者之间,都观察到了质的差异。这些发现有助于指导研究和政策,以应对生活在社区中的创伤性脑损伤患者认为非常重要的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Individualized Physiotherapy and Activity Coaching in Multiple Sclerosis (IPAC-MS): Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparative Cost Analysis of Neck Pain Treatments for Medicare Beneficiaries. Corrigendum. Prevalence of Chronic Health Conditions Among People with Disabilities in the United States. Exploring rest advice in fatigue interventions in rehabilitation among adults with long-term conditions: a systematic scoping review of the reporting of rest in randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1