Increased Auditory Dual Task Cost During Gait Initiation in Adult Patients With Persistent Concussion Symptoms

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.007
Kelsey N. Bryk PhD , Scott Passalugo BS , Li- Shan Chou PhD , Darcy S. Reisman PT, PhD , Jocelyn F. Hafer PhD , Jennifer A. Semrau PhD , Thomas A. Buckley EdD
{"title":"Increased Auditory Dual Task Cost During Gait Initiation in Adult Patients With Persistent Concussion Symptoms","authors":"Kelsey N. Bryk PhD ,&nbsp;Scott Passalugo BS ,&nbsp;Li- Shan Chou PhD ,&nbsp;Darcy S. Reisman PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Jocelyn F. Hafer PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Semrau PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Buckley EdD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare dual task cost (DTC) during gait initiation (GI) between a population of patients with persistent concussion symptoms (PCS) and age-matched healthy participants.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University research center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A cohort sample including 15 participants with PCS (43.9±11.7y, 73.3% female) and 23 age-matched healthy participants (42.1<u>±</u>10.3y, 65.2% female) as controls.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Participants were tested on a single occasion where they performed 5 trials of single task and 5 trials of dual task GI with 12-camera motion capture and 3 force plates.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The dependent variables of interest were the DTC for the center of pressure (COP) displacement and velocity during the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) phase, the COP-center of mass (COP-COM) separation, and the response accuracy during the auditory cognitive tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant group differences with worse DTC for the PCS participants in anterior (A)/posterior (P) displacement (PCS, −37.5±22.1%; Control, −9.7±39.2%; <em>P</em>=.016, d=0.874), APA medial (M)/lateral (L) velocity (PCS, −34.8±28.8%; Control, −17.0±40.21%; <em>P</em>=.041, d=0.866), and the peak COP-COM separation (PCS, −7.3±6.7%; Control, 0.6±6.5%; <em>P</em>=.023, d=1.200). There were no significant group differences in the APA A/P velocity (PCS, −38.8±33.1%; Control, −19.8±43.9%; <em>P</em>=.094), APA M/L displacement (PCS, −34.8±21.8%; Control, −10.6±25.3%; <em>P</em>=.313), or cognitive task performance (PCS, −2.7±10.8%; Control, −0.2±4.3%; <em>P</em>=.321).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PCS participants had greater (worse) DTC during both the planning and execution of the task, with large effect sizes (d&gt;0.80). PCS participants also used a posture-second strategy whereby attentional resources were inappropriately allocated to the cognitive task. These deficits may challenge a patient's ability to complete activities of daily living and limit their functional independence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"105 12","pages":"Pages 2262-2268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324011845","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare dual task cost (DTC) during gait initiation (GI) between a population of patients with persistent concussion symptoms (PCS) and age-matched healthy participants.

Design

Cohort study.

Setting

University research center.

Participants

A cohort sample including 15 participants with PCS (43.9±11.7y, 73.3% female) and 23 age-matched healthy participants (42.1±10.3y, 65.2% female) as controls.

Interventions

Participants were tested on a single occasion where they performed 5 trials of single task and 5 trials of dual task GI with 12-camera motion capture and 3 force plates.

Main Outcome Measures

The dependent variables of interest were the DTC for the center of pressure (COP) displacement and velocity during the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) phase, the COP-center of mass (COP-COM) separation, and the response accuracy during the auditory cognitive tasks.

Results

There were significant group differences with worse DTC for the PCS participants in anterior (A)/posterior (P) displacement (PCS, −37.5±22.1%; Control, −9.7±39.2%; P=.016, d=0.874), APA medial (M)/lateral (L) velocity (PCS, −34.8±28.8%; Control, −17.0±40.21%; P=.041, d=0.866), and the peak COP-COM separation (PCS, −7.3±6.7%; Control, 0.6±6.5%; P=.023, d=1.200). There were no significant group differences in the APA A/P velocity (PCS, −38.8±33.1%; Control, −19.8±43.9%; P=.094), APA M/L displacement (PCS, −34.8±21.8%; Control, −10.6±25.3%; P=.313), or cognitive task performance (PCS, −2.7±10.8%; Control, −0.2±4.3%; P=.321).

Conclusions

PCS participants had greater (worse) DTC during both the planning and execution of the task, with large effect sizes (d>0.80). PCS participants also used a posture-second strategy whereby attentional resources were inappropriately allocated to the cognitive task. These deficits may challenge a patient's ability to complete activities of daily living and limit their functional independence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有持续脑震荡症状的成人患者在步态启动过程中听觉双重任务成本增加。
目的比较持续性脑震荡症状(PCS)患者与年龄匹配的健康参与者在步态启动(GI)过程中的双重任务成本(DTC):设计:队列研究:地点:大学研究中心:队列样本包括 15 名 PCS 患者(43.9 ± 11.7 岁,73.3% 为女性)和 23 名年龄匹配的对照组患者(42.1 ± 10.3 岁,65.2% 为女性):主要结果测量:相关因变量为预期姿势调整(APA)阶段压力中心(COP)位移和速度的DTC、COP-质量中心(COP-COM)分离度以及听觉认知任务中的反应准确性:874)、APA M/L 速度(PCS:-34.8 ± 28.8%,对照组:-17.0 ± 40.21%,P=0.041,d= 0.866)和 COP-COM 分离峰值(PCS:-7.3% ± 6.7%,对照组:0.6 ± 6.5%,P=0.023,d=1.200)。APA的A/P速度(PCS:-38.8 + 33.1%,对照组:-19.8 + 43.9%,P=0.094)、APA的M/L位移(PCS:-34.8 ± 21.8%,对照组:-10.6 ± 25.3%,P=0.313)或认知任务表现(PCS:-2.7 ± 10.8%,对照组:-0.2 ± 4.3%,P=0.321)没有明显的组间差异:结论:PCS 参与者在计划和执行任务过程中的 DTC 均较高(较低),且效应大小较大(d>0.80)。PCS 参与者还采用了 "姿态-秒 "策略,将注意力资源不恰当地分配给了认知任务。这些缺陷可能会影响患者完成日常生活活动的能力,并限制他们的功能独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Employment outcomes among clients with stroke utilizing public vocational rehabilitation services in the United States. Impact of a community-based peer-led eHealth wheelchair skills training program: A randomized control trial. Comparing the different sets of item-diagnostic criteria of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R): a measurement-based approach driven by Rasch analysis. Constant torque stretching in ankle contractures results in greater changes in range of motion than constant angle or dynamic stretching: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical and psychosocial consequences of falls in ambulatory individuals with cerebral palsy by age and gross motor function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1