Association of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on postpartum pelvic floor muscle morphology and function in Chinese primiparous women: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15870
Fei-Xue Shao, Ping He, Ya-Jing Mao, Huan-Rong Liu, Sheng Wan, Shi Qin, Wei-Jia Luo, Jie-Jun Cheng, Min Ren, Xiao-Lin Hua
{"title":"Association of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on postpartum pelvic floor muscle morphology and function in Chinese primiparous women: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Fei-Xue Shao, Ping He, Ya-Jing Mao, Huan-Rong Liu, Sheng Wan, Shi Qin, Wei-Jia Luo, Jie-Jun Cheng, Min Ren, Xiao-Lin Hua","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study aimed to investigate the association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and impaired pelvic floor muscle (PFM) morphology and function during the early postpartum period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from December 2020 to December 2022. A total of 1118 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies who underwent vaginal deliveries and participated in postpartum PFM assessments were included. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG were considered as exposures. PFM morphology and function impairment were the primary outcomes. PFM morphology impairment, defined as levator ani muscle avulsion, was assessed using transperineal ultrasound. PFM function impairment, manifested as diminished PFM fiber strength, was assessed through vaginal manometry. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Restricted cubic spline models were used to validate and visualize the relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with lower pre-pregnancy BMI were at an increased risk of levator ani muscle avulsion (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10-2.70, P = 0.017), particularly when combined with excessive GWG during pregnancy (aOR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.15-8.97, P = 0.027). Lower pre-pregnancy BMI was also identified as an independent predictor of PFM weakness (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.08-2.16, P = 0.017 for type I fiber injuries). Notably, regardless of the avulsion status, both underweight and overweight/obese women faced an elevated risk of reduced PFM strength (aOR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.17-2.59, P = 0.006 for underweight women with type I fiber injuries; aOR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.06-2.64, P = 0.027; and aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.09-2.76, P = 0.021 for overweight/obese women with type I and type II fibers injuries, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both lower and higher pre-pregnancy BMI, as well as excessive GWG, were strongly associated with PFM impairments. These findings highlighted the critical importance of comprehensive weight management throughout pregnancy to effectively promote women's pelvic health.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":"680-692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our study aimed to investigate the association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and impaired pelvic floor muscle (PFM) morphology and function during the early postpartum period.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from December 2020 to December 2022. A total of 1118 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies who underwent vaginal deliveries and participated in postpartum PFM assessments were included. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG were considered as exposures. PFM morphology and function impairment were the primary outcomes. PFM morphology impairment, defined as levator ani muscle avulsion, was assessed using transperineal ultrasound. PFM function impairment, manifested as diminished PFM fiber strength, was assessed through vaginal manometry. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Restricted cubic spline models were used to validate and visualize the relationship.

Results: Women with lower pre-pregnancy BMI were at an increased risk of levator ani muscle avulsion (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10-2.70, P = 0.017), particularly when combined with excessive GWG during pregnancy (aOR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.15-8.97, P = 0.027). Lower pre-pregnancy BMI was also identified as an independent predictor of PFM weakness (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.08-2.16, P = 0.017 for type I fiber injuries). Notably, regardless of the avulsion status, both underweight and overweight/obese women faced an elevated risk of reduced PFM strength (aOR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.17-2.59, P = 0.006 for underweight women with type I fiber injuries; aOR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.06-2.64, P = 0.027; and aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.09-2.76, P = 0.021 for overweight/obese women with type I and type II fibers injuries, respectively).

Conclusions: Both lower and higher pre-pregnancy BMI, as well as excessive GWG, were strongly associated with PFM impairments. These findings highlighted the critical importance of comprehensive weight management throughout pregnancy to effectively promote women's pelvic health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国初产妇孕前体重指数和孕期体重增加与产后盆底肌肉形态和功能的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
研究目的我们的研究旨在探讨孕前体重指数(BMI)、妊娠体重增加(GWG)与产后早期盆底肌(PFM)形态和功能受损之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究于 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月在上海市第一妇婴保健院进行。共纳入 1118 名经阴道分娩并参与产后 PFM 评估的单胎初产妇。产妇孕前体重指数(BMI)和体重指数(GWG)被视为暴露因素。PFM形态和功能损伤是主要结果。阴道前庭肌肉形态损伤的定义是阴道前庭提肌撕裂,通过经会阴超声波进行评估。PFM功能损伤表现为PFM纤维强度减弱,通过阴道测压法进行评估。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来计算调整后的几率比(aOR)和 95% 的置信区间(CI)。限制性立方样条模型用于验证和直观显示两者之间的关系:孕前体重指数(BMI)较低的女性发生提上睑肌撕裂的风险较高(aOR = 1.73,95% CI:1.10-2.70,P = 0.017),尤其是在合并孕期体重指数(GWG)过高的情况下(aOR = 3.20,95% CI:1.15-8.97,P = 0.027)。孕前体重指数较低也被认为是 PFM 薄弱的独立预测因素(aOR = 1.53,95% CI:1.08-2.16,P = 0.017,适用于 I 型纤维损伤)。值得注意的是,无论撕脱状况如何,体重不足和超重/肥胖的女性都面临着 PFM 强度降低的高风险(对于 I 型纤维损伤的体重不足女性,aOR = 1.74,95% CI:1.17-2.59,P = 0.006;对于 I 型纤维损伤的超重/肥胖女性,aOR = 1.67,95% CI:1.06-2.64,P = 0.027;超重/肥胖女性 I 型和 II 型纤维损伤的 aOR = 1.73,95% CI:1.09-2.76,P = 0.021):较低和较高的孕前体重指数以及过高的 GWG 都与 PFM 损伤密切相关。这些发现强调了在整个孕期全面控制体重对有效促进妇女骨盆健康的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Birth companionship: The effect of introducing Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) intervention on improving quality of care: An implementation study. Analyzing the performance of ChatGPT in answering inquiries about cervical cancer. Laparoscopic excision of a large 25 cm adnexal mass with ovarian preservation while minimizing spillage. Aggregate index of systemic inflammation: A novel systemic inflammatory index for prediction of neonatal outcomes and chorioamnionitis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. De novo urethral hypermobility at 6 months after first delivery as a risk factor for stress urinary incontinence 12 years postpartum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1