Psychological Distress Trends and Effect of Media Exposure Among Community Residents After the Seoul Halloween Crowd Crush.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Korean Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e233
Sun Wook Jung, Sra Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Kang-Seob Oh, Young-Chul Shin, Dong-Won Shin, Eun Soo Kim, Se Youl Kim, Kwang-Yeol Lee, Nahyun Oh, Sung Joon Cho, Sang-Won Jeon
{"title":"Psychological Distress Trends and Effect of Media Exposure Among Community Residents After the Seoul Halloween Crowd Crush.","authors":"Sun Wook Jung, Sra Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Kang-Seob Oh, Young-Chul Shin, Dong-Won Shin, Eun Soo Kim, Se Youl Kim, Kwang-Yeol Lee, Nahyun Oh, Sung Joon Cho, Sang-Won Jeon","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear how exposure to and perception of community trauma creates a mental health burden. This study aimed to examine the psychological distress trends among community residents in acute stress reaction, acute stress disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder phases following the Seoul Halloween crowd crush.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-wave repeated cross-sectional survey was conducted with participants after the incident. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni test was adopted to examine temporal changes in psychological distress and psychological outcomes resulting from media impacts. A two-way ANCOVA was adopted to examine the interaction effects of time and relevance to victims on psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 807, 1,703, and 2,220 individuals participated in the three waves. Anxiety (estimated mean [standard error of the mean]: 2.28 [0.03] vs. 2.12 [0.02] vs. 2.03 [0.02]; <i>P</i> < 0.001), depression (2.22 [0.03] vs. 2.01 [0.02] vs. 1.90 [0.02]; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and anger (2.70 [0.03] vs. 2.66 [0.02] vs. 2.49 [0.02]; <i>P</i> < 0.001) gradually improved. However, sense of safety initially worsened and did not recover well (2.96 [0.03] vs. 2.75 [0.02] vs. 2.77 [0.02]; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The interaction effect of time and relevance to the victim were significant in depression (<i>P</i> for interaction = 0.049), anger (<i>P</i> for interaction = 0.016), and sense of safety (<i>P</i> for interaction = 0.004). Among participants unrelated to the victim, those exposed to graphics exhibited higher levels of anxiety (2.09 [0.02] vs. 1.87 [0.07]; <i>P</i> = 0.002), depression (1.99 [0.02] vs. 1.83 [0.07]; <i>P</i> = 0.020), and anger (2.71 [0.03] vs. 2.47 [0.08]; <i>P</i> = 0.003) at W2 and higher anger (2.49 [0.02] vs. 2.31 [0.06]; <i>P</i> = 0.005) at W3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community residents indirectly exposed to trauma also experienced psychological distress in the early stages after the incident. A significant impact of media which might have served as a conduit for unfiltered graphics and rumors was also indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"39 33","pages":"e233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is unclear how exposure to and perception of community trauma creates a mental health burden. This study aimed to examine the psychological distress trends among community residents in acute stress reaction, acute stress disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder phases following the Seoul Halloween crowd crush.

Methods: A three-wave repeated cross-sectional survey was conducted with participants after the incident. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni test was adopted to examine temporal changes in psychological distress and psychological outcomes resulting from media impacts. A two-way ANCOVA was adopted to examine the interaction effects of time and relevance to victims on psychological distress.

Results: A total of 807, 1,703, and 2,220 individuals participated in the three waves. Anxiety (estimated mean [standard error of the mean]: 2.28 [0.03] vs. 2.12 [0.02] vs. 2.03 [0.02]; P < 0.001), depression (2.22 [0.03] vs. 2.01 [0.02] vs. 1.90 [0.02]; P < 0.001), and anger (2.70 [0.03] vs. 2.66 [0.02] vs. 2.49 [0.02]; P < 0.001) gradually improved. However, sense of safety initially worsened and did not recover well (2.96 [0.03] vs. 2.75 [0.02] vs. 2.77 [0.02]; P < 0.001). The interaction effect of time and relevance to the victim were significant in depression (P for interaction = 0.049), anger (P for interaction = 0.016), and sense of safety (P for interaction = 0.004). Among participants unrelated to the victim, those exposed to graphics exhibited higher levels of anxiety (2.09 [0.02] vs. 1.87 [0.07]; P = 0.002), depression (1.99 [0.02] vs. 1.83 [0.07]; P = 0.020), and anger (2.71 [0.03] vs. 2.47 [0.08]; P = 0.003) at W2 and higher anger (2.49 [0.02] vs. 2.31 [0.06]; P = 0.005) at W3.

Conclusion: Community residents indirectly exposed to trauma also experienced psychological distress in the early stages after the incident. A significant impact of media which might have served as a conduit for unfiltered graphics and rumors was also indicated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首尔万圣节人群拥挤事件后社区居民的心理困扰趋势及媒体接触的影响。
背景:目前尚不清楚社区创伤的暴露和感知如何造成心理健康负担。本研究旨在探讨首尔万圣节人群拥挤事件发生后,社区居民在急性应激反应、急性应激障碍和创伤后应激障碍阶段的心理困扰趋势:方法:在事件发生后,对参与者进行了三波重复横断面调查。采用方差分析(ANCOVA)和事后 Bonferroni 检验来研究媒体影响导致的心理困扰和心理结果的时间变化。采用双向方差分析来检验时间和与受害者的相关性对心理困扰的交互影响:共有 807 人、1703 人和 2220 人参加了三次调查。焦虑(估计平均值 [平均值的标准误差]:2.28 [0.03] vs. 2.12 [0.02] vs. 2.03 [0.02];P < 0.001)、抑郁(2.22 [0.03] vs. 2.01 [0.02] vs. 1.90 [0.02];P < 0.001)和愤怒(2.70 [0.03] vs. 2.66 [0.02] vs. 2.49 [0.02];P < 0.001)逐渐得到改善。然而,安全感最初有所恶化,且恢复情况不佳(2.96 [0.03] vs. 2.75 [0.02] vs. 2.77 [0.02];P < 0.001)。在抑郁(交互作用 P = 0.049)、愤怒(交互作用 P = 0.016)和安全感(交互作用 P = 0.004)方面,时间与受害者相关性的交互作用效果显著。在与受害者无关的参与者中,接触到图形的参与者表现出更高水平的焦虑(2.09 [0.02] vs. 1.87 [0.07];P = 0.002)、抑郁(1.99 [0.02] vs. 1.83 [0.07]; P = 0.020)和愤怒(2.71 [0.03] vs. 2.47 [0.08]; P = 0.003),而在 W3 时愤怒程度更高(2.49 [0.02] vs. 2.31 [0.06]; P = 0.005):结论:间接遭受创伤的社区居民在事件发生后的早期阶段也经历了心理困扰。此外,媒体可能成为未经过滤的图片和谣言的传播渠道,这也产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Current Status of Co-Ordering of C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Testing in Korea. Diagnostic Value of Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Hemorrhage on Clavicular Periosteum in Hanging Deaths. Happiness and Its Association With Suicide Ideation and Attempt in Korea: The Roles of Socio-Environmental, Psychological, and Health-Related Factors. In This Issue on 18-November-2024. Letter to the Editor: Before Characterising Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Viral and Immunologic Parameters, Alternative Causes of Their Increase Must Be Ruled Out.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1