Resolving Differences between MLSS and CP by Considering Rates of Change of Blood Lactate during Endurance Exercise.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003548
Ozgur Ozkaya, Hakan As, Arda Peker, Mark Burnley, Andrew M Jones
{"title":"Resolving Differences between MLSS and CP by Considering Rates of Change of Blood Lactate during Endurance Exercise.","authors":"Ozgur Ozkaya, Hakan As, Arda Peker, Mark Burnley, Andrew M Jones","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a new method that more closely represents the heavy-to-severe exercise domain boundary by evaluating the rates of blood lactate accumulation during the constant power output exercise bouts that are employed in the assessment of the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight well-trained male cyclists completed five exercise tests of up to 30 min for determination of the traditional MLSS (MLSSTRAD) and a further four maximal tests for determination of critical power (CP). The rates of change of blood [lactate] between 10 min and the end of exercise in the MLSS tests were plotted against the corresponding power outputs and a two-segment linear regression model was used to identify individualised breakpoints in lactate accumulation vs. power output (MLSSMOD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MLSSMOD was significantly higher than MLSSTRAD (297 ± 41 vs. 278 ± 41 W; P < 0.001) but was not significantly different from CP (297 ± 41 W; P > 0.05); MLSSMOD and CP were closely aligned (r: 0.97; Bias: -0.52 W; SEE: 10 W; Limits of Agreement: -20 to 19 W). The rates of change of both blood [lactate] and V̇O2 were significantly greater, and exercise intolerance occurred before 30 min, at a power output slightly above MLSSMOD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel method for evaluating blood lactate kinetics during a traditional MLSS protocol produces a modified MLSS that is not different from CP and better represents the heavy-to-severe exercise domain boundary.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a new method that more closely represents the heavy-to-severe exercise domain boundary by evaluating the rates of blood lactate accumulation during the constant power output exercise bouts that are employed in the assessment of the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS).

Methods: Eight well-trained male cyclists completed five exercise tests of up to 30 min for determination of the traditional MLSS (MLSSTRAD) and a further four maximal tests for determination of critical power (CP). The rates of change of blood [lactate] between 10 min and the end of exercise in the MLSS tests were plotted against the corresponding power outputs and a two-segment linear regression model was used to identify individualised breakpoints in lactate accumulation vs. power output (MLSSMOD).

Results: MLSSMOD was significantly higher than MLSSTRAD (297 ± 41 vs. 278 ± 41 W; P < 0.001) but was not significantly different from CP (297 ± 41 W; P > 0.05); MLSSMOD and CP were closely aligned (r: 0.97; Bias: -0.52 W; SEE: 10 W; Limits of Agreement: -20 to 19 W). The rates of change of both blood [lactate] and V̇O2 were significantly greater, and exercise intolerance occurred before 30 min, at a power output slightly above MLSSMOD.

Conclusions: A novel method for evaluating blood lactate kinetics during a traditional MLSS protocol produces a modified MLSS that is not different from CP and better represents the heavy-to-severe exercise domain boundary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过考虑耐力运动中血液乳酸的变化率来解决 MLSS 和 CP 之间的差异。
目的:通过评估在最大乳酸稳态(MLSS)评估中采用的恒定功率输出运动阵痛期间的血乳酸累积率,开发一种更接近重度到剧烈运动领域边界的新方法:方法:八名训练有素的男性自行车运动员完成了五次长达 30 分钟的运动测试,以确定传统的最大乳酸稳态(MLSSTRAD),并完成了另外四次最大测试,以确定临界功率(CP)。将 MLSS 测试中 10 分钟至运动结束时的血液[乳酸]变化率与相应的功率输出进行对比,并使用双段线性回归模型确定乳酸累积与功率输出的个性化断点(MLSSMOD):结果:MLSSMOD 明显高于 MLSSTRAD(297 ± 41 对 278 ± 41 W;P < 0.001),但与 CP(297 ± 41 W;P > 0.05)无明显差异;MLSSMOD 和 CP 非常接近(r:0.97;偏差:-0.52 W;SEE:10 W;一致界限:-20 至 19 W)。血液[乳酸]和 VO2 的变化率都显著增大,在输出功率略高于 MLSSMOD 时,运动不耐受发生在 30 分钟之前:结论:在传统的 MLSS 方案中,采用新方法评估血液乳酸动力学,可得出与 CP 无异的修正 MLSS,并能更好地代表大运动量到剧烈运动领域的边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Influence of Limb Blood Flow on Contraction-Induced Muscle Growth and the Impact of that Growth on Changes in Maximal Strength. Is the Force-Velocity Profile for Free Jumping a Sound Basis for Individualized Jump Training Prescriptions? Comparing Step Counting Algorithms for High-Resolution Wrist Accelerometry Data in NHANES 2011-2014. Physical Activity Declines over a 12-Month Period in Parkinson's Disease: Considerations for Longitudinal Activity Monitoring. Varus Strength of the Medial Elbow Musculature for Stress Shielding of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament in Competitive Baseball Pitchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1