Treatment satisfaction, unmet needs, and new treatment expectations for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause: women's and physicians' opinions.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1097/GME.0000000000002399
Barbara J DePree, Aki Shiozawa, Janet Kim, Yao Wang, Hongbo Yang, Shayna Mancuso
{"title":"Treatment satisfaction, unmet needs, and new treatment expectations for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause: women's and physicians' opinions.","authors":"Barbara J DePree, Aki Shiozawa, Janet Kim, Yao Wang, Hongbo Yang, Shayna Mancuso","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess treatment satisfaction, unmet treatment needs, and new vasomotor symptom (VMS) treatment expectations among women with moderate to severe VMS and physicians treating women with VMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This noninterventional, nonrandomized survey included qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys of women and physicians in the US. Participating women had moderate to severe VMS in the past year and received ≥1 hormone therapy (HT), non-HT, or over-the-counter (OTC) treatment for VMS in the past 3 months. Participating physicians were obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) and primary care physicians (PCPs) who treated ≥15 women with VMS in the past 3 months. Two online survey questionnaires were developed using insights from literature, qualitative interviews, and clinical experts. Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MS-TSQ) measured treatment satisfaction. Results were summarized descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were completed by 401 women with VMS and 207 physicians treating VMS. Among women, mean total MS-TSQ score ranges were 62.8-67.3 for HT, 59.8-69.7 for non-HT, and 58.0-64.9 for OTC treatments. Among physicians, mean total MS-TSQ scores were considerably higher for HT than for non-HT and OTC treatments (HT: 73.4-75.6; non-HT: 55.6-62.1; OTC: 49.2-54.7). Women reported \"lack of effectiveness\" (41.2%), and physicians reported \"long-term safety concerns\" (56.5%) as main features that do not meet their current treatment expectations. The majority of women and physicians would consider trying a new non-HT treatment for VMS (75.8 and 75.9%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment satisfaction and new treatment expectations were similar but with some differences between women and physicians; the need for additional treatments for VMS was identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess treatment satisfaction, unmet treatment needs, and new vasomotor symptom (VMS) treatment expectations among women with moderate to severe VMS and physicians treating women with VMS.

Methods: This noninterventional, nonrandomized survey included qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys of women and physicians in the US. Participating women had moderate to severe VMS in the past year and received ≥1 hormone therapy (HT), non-HT, or over-the-counter (OTC) treatment for VMS in the past 3 months. Participating physicians were obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) and primary care physicians (PCPs) who treated ≥15 women with VMS in the past 3 months. Two online survey questionnaires were developed using insights from literature, qualitative interviews, and clinical experts. Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MS-TSQ) measured treatment satisfaction. Results were summarized descriptively.

Results: Questionnaires were completed by 401 women with VMS and 207 physicians treating VMS. Among women, mean total MS-TSQ score ranges were 62.8-67.3 for HT, 59.8-69.7 for non-HT, and 58.0-64.9 for OTC treatments. Among physicians, mean total MS-TSQ scores were considerably higher for HT than for non-HT and OTC treatments (HT: 73.4-75.6; non-HT: 55.6-62.1; OTC: 49.2-54.7). Women reported "lack of effectiveness" (41.2%), and physicians reported "long-term safety concerns" (56.5%) as main features that do not meet their current treatment expectations. The majority of women and physicians would consider trying a new non-HT treatment for VMS (75.8 and 75.9%, respectively).

Conclusions: Treatment satisfaction and new treatment expectations were similar but with some differences between women and physicians; the need for additional treatments for VMS was identified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更年期引起的血管运动症状的治疗满意度、未满足的需求和新的治疗期望:妇女和医生的观点。
目的评估中度至重度血管性症状(VMS)妇女和治疗妇女血管性症状(VMS)的医生的治疗满意度、未满足的治疗需求和新的血管性症状(VMS)治疗期望:这项非干预、非随机调查包括对美国妇女和医生的定性访谈和定量调查。参与调查的妇女在过去一年中患有中度至重度VMS,并且在过去3个月中接受过≥1次激素疗法(HT)、非激素疗法或非处方药(OTC)治疗。参与调查的医生是妇产科医生(OB-GYN)和初级保健医生(PCP),他们在过去 3 个月中治疗过≥15 名 VMS 妇女。根据文献、定性访谈和临床专家的见解,我们编制了两份在线调查问卷。更年期症状治疗满意度问卷(MS-TSQ)测量治疗满意度。对结果进行了描述性总结:401名女性更年期综合征患者和207名治疗更年期综合征的医生填写了问卷。在妇女中,HT 治疗的 MS-TSQ 平均总分范围为 62.8-67.3,非 HT 治疗为 59.8-69.7,OTC 治疗为 58.0-64.9。在医生中,高温热疗的 MS-TSQ 平均总分大大高于非高温热疗和非处方药治疗(高温热疗:73.4-75.6;非高温热疗:55.6-62.1;非处方药:49.2-54.7)。妇女认为 "缺乏有效性"(41.2%)和医生认为 "长期安全性问题"(56.5%)是不符合她们当前治疗期望的主要特征。大多数女性和医生会考虑尝试新的非 HT 治疗方法来治疗 VMS(分别为 75.8% 和 75.9%):结论:治疗满意度和新的治疗期望值相似,但女性和医生之间存在一些差异;VMS 需要更多的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
期刊最新文献
Exploring menopausal symptoms, attitudes, and behaviors among menopausal women in China: an online research perspective. History of infertility and anti-Müllerian hormone levels among participants in the Nurses' Health Study II. The effects of acupressure, laughter yoga, and a mindfulness-based stress reduction program applied to postmenopausal women for menopause symptoms and quality of life. Vaginal microbiota, menopause, and the use of menopausal hormone therapy: a cross-sectional, pilot study in Chinese women. Premature ovarian insufficiency: knowledge, attitudes, and quality of care offered by gynecologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1