Laura De Rosa, Antonio Salvati, Nicola Martini, Dante Chiappino, Simone Cappelli, Marcello Mancini, Libertario Demi, Lorenzo Ghiadoni, Ferruccio Bonino, Maurizia R. Brunetto, Francesco Faita
{"title":"An ultrasound multiparametric method to quantify liver fat using magnetic resonance as standard reference","authors":"Laura De Rosa, Antonio Salvati, Nicola Martini, Dante Chiappino, Simone Cappelli, Marcello Mancini, Libertario Demi, Lorenzo Ghiadoni, Ferruccio Bonino, Maurizia R. Brunetto, Francesco Faita","doi":"10.1111/liv.16078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background & Aims</h3>\n \n <p>There is an unmet need for a reliable and reproducible non-invasive measure of fatty liver content (FLC) for monitoring steatotic liver disease in clinical practice. Sonographic FLC assessment is qualitative and operator-dependent, and the dynamic quantification range of algorithms based on a single ultrasound (US) parameter is unsatisfactory.</p>\n \n <p>This study aims to develop and validate a new multiparametric algorithm based on B-mode images to quantify FLC using Magnetic Resonance (MR) values as standard reference.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with elevated liver enzymes and/or bright liver at US (<i>N</i> = 195) underwent FLC evaluation by MR and by US. Five US-derived quantitative features [attenuation rate(AR), hepatic renal-ratio(HR), diaphragm visualization(DV), hepatic-portal-vein-ratio(HPV), portal-vein-wall(PVW)] were combined by mixed linear/exponential regression in a multiparametric model (Steatoscore2.0). One hundred and thirty-four subjects were used for training and 61 for independent validations; score-computation underwent an inter-operator reproducibility analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The model is based on a mixed linear/exponential combination of 3 US parameters (AR, HR, DV), modelled by 2 equations according to AR values. The computation of FLC by Steatoscore2.0 (mean ± std, 7.91% ± 8.69) and MR (mean ± std, 8.10% ± 10.31) is highly correlated with a low root mean square error in both training/validation cohorts, respectively (<i>R</i> = 0.92/0.86 and RMSE = 5.15/4.62, <i>p</i> < .001). Steatoscore2.0 identified patients with MR-FLC≥5%/≥10% with sensitivity = 93.2%/89.4%, specificity = 86.1%/95.8%, AUROC = 0.958/0.975, respectively and correlated with MR (<i>R</i> = 0.92) significantly (<i>p</i> < .001) better than CAP (<i>R</i> = 0.73).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Multiparametric Steatoscore2.0 measures FLC providing values highly comparable with MR. It is reliable, inexpensive, easy to use with any US equipment and qualifies to be tested in larger, prospective studies as new tool for the non-invasive screening and monitoring of FLC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"44 11","pages":"3008-3019"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/liv.16078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.16078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background & Aims
There is an unmet need for a reliable and reproducible non-invasive measure of fatty liver content (FLC) for monitoring steatotic liver disease in clinical practice. Sonographic FLC assessment is qualitative and operator-dependent, and the dynamic quantification range of algorithms based on a single ultrasound (US) parameter is unsatisfactory.
This study aims to develop and validate a new multiparametric algorithm based on B-mode images to quantify FLC using Magnetic Resonance (MR) values as standard reference.
Methods
Patients with elevated liver enzymes and/or bright liver at US (N = 195) underwent FLC evaluation by MR and by US. Five US-derived quantitative features [attenuation rate(AR), hepatic renal-ratio(HR), diaphragm visualization(DV), hepatic-portal-vein-ratio(HPV), portal-vein-wall(PVW)] were combined by mixed linear/exponential regression in a multiparametric model (Steatoscore2.0). One hundred and thirty-four subjects were used for training and 61 for independent validations; score-computation underwent an inter-operator reproducibility analysis.
Results
The model is based on a mixed linear/exponential combination of 3 US parameters (AR, HR, DV), modelled by 2 equations according to AR values. The computation of FLC by Steatoscore2.0 (mean ± std, 7.91% ± 8.69) and MR (mean ± std, 8.10% ± 10.31) is highly correlated with a low root mean square error in both training/validation cohorts, respectively (R = 0.92/0.86 and RMSE = 5.15/4.62, p < .001). Steatoscore2.0 identified patients with MR-FLC≥5%/≥10% with sensitivity = 93.2%/89.4%, specificity = 86.1%/95.8%, AUROC = 0.958/0.975, respectively and correlated with MR (R = 0.92) significantly (p < .001) better than CAP (R = 0.73).
Conclusions
Multiparametric Steatoscore2.0 measures FLC providing values highly comparable with MR. It is reliable, inexpensive, easy to use with any US equipment and qualifies to be tested in larger, prospective studies as new tool for the non-invasive screening and monitoring of FLC.
期刊介绍:
Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.