Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Aripiprazole Addition to Clozapine in Patients with Clozapine-Resistant Symptoms (EMECLO): A Protocol of a Single-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Trial.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacopsychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2364-4357
Manouk den Toom, Laura Blanken, Inge Horn, Selene Veerman, Joris J B van der Vlugt-Molenaar, Mariken B de Koning, Jan Bogers, John Enterman, Martin de Jonge, Daniela Cianci, Gerardus W J Frederix, Hans J de Haas, Bram W Storosum, Mike Veereschild, Martin Javadzadeh, Peter F J Schulte, Dan Cohen, Jim van Os, Wiepke Cahn, Lieuwe de Haan, Jasper B Zantvoord, Jurjen J Luykx
{"title":"Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Aripiprazole Addition to Clozapine in Patients with Clozapine-Resistant Symptoms (EMECLO): A Protocol of a Single-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Trial.","authors":"Manouk den Toom, Laura Blanken, Inge Horn, Selene Veerman, Joris J B van der Vlugt-Molenaar, Mariken B de Koning, Jan Bogers, John Enterman, Martin de Jonge, Daniela Cianci, Gerardus W J Frederix, Hans J de Haas, Bram W Storosum, Mike Veereschild, Martin Javadzadeh, Peter F J Schulte, Dan Cohen, Jim van Os, Wiepke Cahn, Lieuwe de Haan, Jasper B Zantvoord, Jurjen J Luykx","doi":"10.1055/a-2364-4357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, guidance on the most effective treatment for patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD) is lacking. While augmentation strategies to clozapine with aripiprazole and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) have been demonstrated to be effective in patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders (CRS), head-to-head comparisons between these addition strategies are unavailable. We therefore aim to examine the feasibility of a larger randomized, single-blind trial comparing the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of aripiprazole addition vs. ECT addition in CRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-center, randomized, single-blind feasibility study, the feasibility of recruiting 20 participants with CRS who will be randomized to either aripiprazole or bilateral ECT addition will be assessed. The main endpoint is the number of patients willing to be randomized. The number of screened individuals and reasons to decline participation will be recorded. Effects will be estimated for the benefit of the foreseen larger trial. To that end, differences between both arms in symptom severity will be assessed using blinded video assessments. In addition, tolerability (e. g., cognitive functioning), safety, quality of life, recovery, and all-cause discontinuation will be compared. The follow-up period is 16 weeks, after which non-responders will be given the option to switch to the other treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Strengths of this feasibility trial include maintaining blinding with video assessment, a possibility to switch groups in case of non-response, and a broad set of outcome measures. Identification of factors contributing to non-participation and drop-out will generate valuable information on trial feasibility and may enhance recruitment strategies in a follow-up RCT.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, and was registered on 1 May 2022 in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) under the trial name 'EMECLO' (2021-006333-19).</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2364-4357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, guidance on the most effective treatment for patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD) is lacking. While augmentation strategies to clozapine with aripiprazole and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) have been demonstrated to be effective in patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders (CRS), head-to-head comparisons between these addition strategies are unavailable. We therefore aim to examine the feasibility of a larger randomized, single-blind trial comparing the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of aripiprazole addition vs. ECT addition in CRS.

Methods: In this multi-center, randomized, single-blind feasibility study, the feasibility of recruiting 20 participants with CRS who will be randomized to either aripiprazole or bilateral ECT addition will be assessed. The main endpoint is the number of patients willing to be randomized. The number of screened individuals and reasons to decline participation will be recorded. Effects will be estimated for the benefit of the foreseen larger trial. To that end, differences between both arms in symptom severity will be assessed using blinded video assessments. In addition, tolerability (e. g., cognitive functioning), safety, quality of life, recovery, and all-cause discontinuation will be compared. The follow-up period is 16 weeks, after which non-responders will be given the option to switch to the other treatment.

Discussion: Strengths of this feasibility trial include maintaining blinding with video assessment, a possibility to switch groups in case of non-response, and a broad set of outcome measures. Identification of factors contributing to non-participation and drop-out will generate valuable information on trial feasibility and may enhance recruitment strategies in a follow-up RCT.

Trial registration: The study has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, and was registered on 1 May 2022 in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) under the trial name 'EMECLO' (2021-006333-19).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电休克疗法与在氯氮平基础上加用阿立哌唑治疗氯氮平耐药症状患者(EMECLO):单盲、多中心、随机对照可行性试验方案》。
背景:目前,对于氯氮平耐药精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)患者最有效的治疗方法还缺乏指导。阿立哌唑和电休克疗法(ECT)作为氯氮平的辅助治疗策略已被证实对氯氮平耐药的精神分裂症谱系障碍(CRS)患者有效,但这些辅助治疗策略之间的正面比较尚不存在。因此,我们旨在研究一项更大规模的随机、单盲试验的可行性,比较阿立哌唑加用与ECT加用在CRS中的有效性、成本效益和安全性:在这项多中心、随机、单盲可行性研究中,将评估招募20名CRS患者的可行性,这些患者将随机接受阿立哌唑或双侧ECT治疗。主要终点是愿意接受随机治疗的患者人数。将记录接受筛选的人数和拒绝参与的原因。将对效果进行估计,以利于预期的更大规模试验。为此,将使用盲法视频评估两种方法在症状严重程度上的差异。此外,还将比较耐受性(如认知功能)、安全性、生活质量、恢复情况和全因停药情况。随访期为 16 周,随访期结束后,无应答者可选择转用其他疗法:讨论:这项可行性试验的优点包括通过视频评估保持盲目性、在无应答的情况下可以换组以及广泛的结果测量。确定导致不参与和退出的因素将为试验的可行性提供有价值的信息,并可加强后续 RCT 的招募策略:该研究已获得阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心(AMC)医学研究伦理委员会的批准,并于2022年5月1日在欧盟临床试验注册中心(EudraCT)注册,试验名称为 "EMECLO"(2021-006333-19)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacopsychiatry
Pharmacopsychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering advances in the fi eld of psychotropic drugs, Pharmaco psychiatry provides psychiatrists, neuroscientists and clinicians with key clinical insights and describes new avenues of research and treatment. The pharmacological and neurobiological bases of psychiatric disorders are discussed by presenting clinical and experimental research.
期刊最新文献
News on the Role of Antidepressants in and for COVID-19 and Long COVID. Monitoring Anesthetic Depth Using the Patient State Index in Electroconvulsive Therapy Improves Seizure Quality. Correction: Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Aripiprazole Addition to Clozapine in Patients with Clozapine-Resistant Symptoms (EMECLO): A Protocol of a Single-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Trial. Advancements in Non-Dopaminergic Treatments for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Pipeline Developments. Discontinuation Rate of Lurasidone and Quetiapine Extended Release in Bipolar Depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1