Understanding Lived Experience Organizations: A Systematic Scoping Review of Organizational Elements and Characteristics.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20230643
Jessica E Opie, An Vuong, Christopher Maylea, Hanan Khalil, Louis Brown, Alexandra Macafee, Blossom Ah Ket, Natalie Pearce, Nicola Guerin, Jennifer E McIntosh
{"title":"Understanding Lived Experience Organizations: A Systematic Scoping Review of Organizational Elements and Characteristics.","authors":"Jessica E Opie, An Vuong, Christopher Maylea, Hanan Khalil, Louis Brown, Alexandra Macafee, Blossom Ah Ket, Natalie Pearce, Nicola Guerin, Jennifer E McIntosh","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mental health lived experience organizations (LEOs) and their lived experience workforce are increasingly recognized as invaluable. However, a deeper understanding of the elements that enhance or inhibit LEOs' efficacy is required to learn how to sustain LEOs and support their workforce. Rapid international expansion has resulted in significant LEO growth and change, challenging many LEOs to adapt. With this rapid expansion, the field is evolving faster than many LEOs can keep pace with. This review, codesigned and coproduced in partnership with a LEO to draw on both lived experience and academic perspectives, aims for a deeper understanding of which elements within a LEO enhance or inhibit its efficacy, growth, and support for its lived experience workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and JBI methodology, identified 60 records published in English between 2000 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate general agreement regarding which LEO elements are important (e.g., culture, leadership, board composition, organizational structure, financial arrangements, and professionalization). However, considerable disagreements exist regarding the relative influence of several of these elements, especially funding arrangements, in which funder and LEO values often diverge; training for increased lived experience professionalization; and partnerships with medical model-focused mental health services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Organizational disagreements relate to managing future LEO growth and advancing the lived experience workforce while preserving LEOs' unique characteristics that make them valued mental health services. Further research should examine community differences among LEOs, including hybrid LEOs within services and non-LEO mental health organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mental health lived experience organizations (LEOs) and their lived experience workforce are increasingly recognized as invaluable. However, a deeper understanding of the elements that enhance or inhibit LEOs' efficacy is required to learn how to sustain LEOs and support their workforce. Rapid international expansion has resulted in significant LEO growth and change, challenging many LEOs to adapt. With this rapid expansion, the field is evolving faster than many LEOs can keep pace with. This review, codesigned and coproduced in partnership with a LEO to draw on both lived experience and academic perspectives, aims for a deeper understanding of which elements within a LEO enhance or inhibit its efficacy, growth, and support for its lived experience workforce.

Methods: A systematic search of peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and JBI methodology, identified 60 records published in English between 2000 and 2022.

Results: The results indicate general agreement regarding which LEO elements are important (e.g., culture, leadership, board composition, organizational structure, financial arrangements, and professionalization). However, considerable disagreements exist regarding the relative influence of several of these elements, especially funding arrangements, in which funder and LEO values often diverge; training for increased lived experience professionalization; and partnerships with medical model-focused mental health services.

Conclusions: Organizational disagreements relate to managing future LEO growth and advancing the lived experience workforce while preserving LEOs' unique characteristics that make them valued mental health services. Further research should examine community differences among LEOs, including hybrid LEOs within services and non-LEO mental health organizations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解生活体验组织:对组织要素和特征的系统范围审查。
目的:心理健康生活体验组织(LEOs)及其生活体验工作团队的价值日益得到认可。然而,要了解如何维持 LEO 和支持他们的工作队伍,就需要对提高或抑制 LEO 效率的因素有更深入的了解。迅速的国际扩张带来了 LEO 的显著增长和变化,对许多 LEO 的适应能力提出了挑战。随着这种快速扩张,该领域的发展速度超过了许多 LEO 的发展速度。本综述是与一家 LEO 合作设计和共同制作的,借鉴了生活经验和学术观点,旨在更深入地了解 LEO 中的哪些因素会提高或抑制其效率、发展以及对其生活经验工作团队的支持:方法:根据PRISMA-ScR指南和JBI方法,对同行评议和非同行评议文献进行了系统检索,发现了2000年至2022年间发表的60篇英文文献:结果表明,对于哪些 LEO 要素(如文化、领导力、董事会组成、组织结构、财务安排和专业化)是重要的,人们普遍达成了一致。然而,在其中几个要素的相对影响方面存在着相当大的分歧,尤其是资金安排,因为资金提供者和 LEO 的价值观往往不一致;为提高生活经验专业化程度而进行的培训;以及与以医疗模式为重点的心理健康服务机构的合作关系:组织上的分歧涉及到如何管理 LEO 的未来发展,以及如何在保持 LEO 独特性的同时促进生活体验工作队伍的发展,这些独特性使 LEO 成为有价值的心理健康服务机构。进一步的研究应该考察 LEO 之间的社区差异,包括服务机构中的混合 LEO 和非 LEO 心理健康组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
A Lived Experience Perspective in Suicide Prevention Research. State Policy Strategies for the Workforce Emergency in Behavioral Health. Employment Experiences and Employability of People in China Living With Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Study. Recovery Coach Program Implementation Across an Integrated Health System. Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Individuals With Versus Without Diagnosed Psychiatric Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1