Exploring exudate viscosity: A rheological analysis of wound exudates.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Wound Repair and Regeneration Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1111/wrr.13213
Gianluca Melotto, Avick Sinha, Jaqueline Rachel Forss
{"title":"Exploring exudate viscosity: A rheological analysis of wound exudates.","authors":"Gianluca Melotto, Avick Sinha, Jaqueline Rachel Forss","doi":"10.1111/wrr.13213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exudate and its viscosity are critical in wound healing. Changes in viscosity can interfere with dressings properties as well as affect the diffusion of immune cells, nutrients, oxygen and bacteria. Current international standards for laboratory testing of wound dressings use a single low-viscosity solution, named as 'Test Solution A', which fails to simulate the diverse range of exudates encountered clinically. This study employs rheological analysis to characterise exudates viscosity, comparing cattle-derived samples to the test solution A. Results reveal non-Newtonian, shear-thinning behaviour in exudates, contrasting with the Newtonian behaviour of the test solution A. Although clinically classified as 'seropurulent', three exudate samples analysed at 37°C present with different viscosity at various shear rates, ranging from 30.8 (±14.7) to 6.5 (±1.9) mPas. Findings show that the current tests on dressings employing Test Solution A are missing the complexity of real exudates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":" ","pages":"671-674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exudate and its viscosity are critical in wound healing. Changes in viscosity can interfere with dressings properties as well as affect the diffusion of immune cells, nutrients, oxygen and bacteria. Current international standards for laboratory testing of wound dressings use a single low-viscosity solution, named as 'Test Solution A', which fails to simulate the diverse range of exudates encountered clinically. This study employs rheological analysis to characterise exudates viscosity, comparing cattle-derived samples to the test solution A. Results reveal non-Newtonian, shear-thinning behaviour in exudates, contrasting with the Newtonian behaviour of the test solution A. Although clinically classified as 'seropurulent', three exudate samples analysed at 37°C present with different viscosity at various shear rates, ranging from 30.8 (±14.7) to 6.5 (±1.9) mPas. Findings show that the current tests on dressings employing Test Solution A are missing the complexity of real exudates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索渗出物的粘度:伤口渗出物流变分析。
渗出物及其粘度对伤口愈合至关重要。粘度的变化会干扰敷料的特性,并影响免疫细胞、营养物质、氧气和细菌的扩散。目前实验室测试伤口敷料的国际标准使用的是单一的低粘度溶液,即 "测试溶液 A",这种溶液无法模拟临床上遇到的各种渗出液。本研究采用流变学分析来描述渗出液的粘度特性,并将牛源样本与测试溶液 A 进行比较。结果显示渗出液具有非牛顿、剪切稀化特性,与测试溶液 A 的牛顿特性形成鲜明对比。虽然临床上将渗出液归类为 "血清脓性",但在 37°C 温度下分析的三个渗出液样本在不同剪切速率下具有不同的粘度,从 30.8 (±14.7) 到 6.5 (±1.9) mPas 不等。研究结果表明,目前使用测试溶液 A 对敷料进行的测试未能反映真实渗出物的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
期刊最新文献
The Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies Guidelines. Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers receiving standard treatment in randomised controlled trials: A random effects meta-analysis. Isotonic medium treatment limits burn wound microbial colonisation and improves tissue repair. The infected diabetic foot: Incidence and risk factors for dehiscence after surgery for diabetic foot infections. Synergistic effects of incorporated additives in multifunctional dressings for chronic wound healing: An updated comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1