Applying a Racial Lens to the "Cycle of Violence".

IF 4.5 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Maltreatment Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1177/10775595241272040
Cathy Spatz Widom, Maureen Allwood, Preeti Chauhan, Xuechen Li, Kellie Courtney, Funlola G Are
{"title":"Applying a Racial Lens to the \"Cycle of Violence\".","authors":"Cathy Spatz Widom, Maureen Allwood, Preeti Chauhan, Xuechen Li, Kellie Courtney, Funlola G Are","doi":"10.1177/10775595241272040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One overlooked result in a 1989 <i>Science</i> paper on the \"cycle of violence\" was a race-specific increase in risk for arrest for violence among Black maltreated children, but not White maltreated children. We examine whether race differences in the cycle of violence are explained by risk factors traditionally associated with violence. Using a prospective design, maltreated and non-maltreated children were matched on age, sex, race, and approximate family social class and interviewed at mean age 28.7 years (<i>N</i> = 1196). Arrest histories were obtained through age 50.5. Regression analyses included maltreatment, race, self-reported violent behavior, and risk factors (e.g., family, school, neighborhood variables). For arrests for violent crime, race was a significant predictor, whereas childhood maltreatment was not significant. For violent arrests, there was a significant race × maltreatment interaction when the total number of risk factors were included controlling for self-reported violent behaviors. For self-reported violent behaviors, childhood maltreatment remained significant for some risk factors. However, race did <u>not</u> predict self-reported violent behaviors. Offending behavior and traditional risk factors did not explain the disproportionate arrests among Black maltreated children. This disparity in the cycle of violence may reflect complex processes influenced by racial bias or structural racism.</p>","PeriodicalId":48052,"journal":{"name":"Child Maltreatment","volume":" ","pages":"10775595241272040"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Maltreatment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595241272040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One overlooked result in a 1989 Science paper on the "cycle of violence" was a race-specific increase in risk for arrest for violence among Black maltreated children, but not White maltreated children. We examine whether race differences in the cycle of violence are explained by risk factors traditionally associated with violence. Using a prospective design, maltreated and non-maltreated children were matched on age, sex, race, and approximate family social class and interviewed at mean age 28.7 years (N = 1196). Arrest histories were obtained through age 50.5. Regression analyses included maltreatment, race, self-reported violent behavior, and risk factors (e.g., family, school, neighborhood variables). For arrests for violent crime, race was a significant predictor, whereas childhood maltreatment was not significant. For violent arrests, there was a significant race × maltreatment interaction when the total number of risk factors were included controlling for self-reported violent behaviors. For self-reported violent behaviors, childhood maltreatment remained significant for some risk factors. However, race did not predict self-reported violent behaviors. Offending behavior and traditional risk factors did not explain the disproportionate arrests among Black maltreated children. This disparity in the cycle of violence may reflect complex processes influenced by racial bias or structural racism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从种族角度看待 "暴力循环"。
1989 年《科学》杂志发表了一篇关于 "暴力循环 "的论文,其中一个被忽视的结果是,受虐待的黑人儿童因暴力而被捕的风险因种族而异有所增加,但受虐待的白人儿童却没有这种情况。我们研究了暴力循环中的种族差异是否可以用传统上与暴力相关的风险因素来解释。通过前瞻性设计,受虐待儿童和未受虐待儿童在年龄、性别、种族和近似家庭社会阶层方面进行了匹配,并在平均年龄 28.7 岁时接受了访谈(N = 1196)。获得的逮捕史一直持续到 50.5 岁。回归分析包括虐待、种族、自我报告的暴力行为和风险因素(如家庭、学校、邻里变量)。对于因暴力犯罪而被捕的人来说,种族是一个重要的预测因素,而儿童虐待则不重要。对于因暴力犯罪而被捕的儿童来说,如果将所有风险因素都包括在内,并对自我报告的暴力行为进行控制,则种族与虐待之间存在显著的交互作用。就自我报告的暴力行为而言,童年虐待对某些风险因素仍有显著影响。然而,种族并不能预测自我报告的暴力行为。犯罪行为和传统的风险因素并不能解释黑人受虐待儿童被捕人数过多的原因。暴力循环中的这种差异可能反映了受种族偏见或结构性种族主义影响的复杂过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Maltreatment
Child Maltreatment Multiple-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.80%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Child Maltreatment is the official journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC), the nation"s largest interdisciplinary child maltreatment professional organization. Child Maltreatment"s object is to foster professional excellence in the field of child abuse and neglect by reporting current and at-issue scientific information and technical innovations in a form immediately useful to practitioners and researchers from mental health, child protection, law, law enforcement, medicine, nursing, and allied disciplines. Child Maltreatment emphasizes perspectives with a rigorous scientific base that are relevant to policy, practice, and research.
期刊最新文献
Child Fatalities Resulting From Caregiver Behavior: A Public Health Approach to Child Maltreatment Classification. Child Protection Responses to Domestic Violence Exposure: Co-Occurring Safety Concerns and Investigation Outcomes. Dimensions of Child Maltreatment in Australians With a History of Out-of-Home Care. Birth Spacing and Child Maltreatment: Population-Level Estimates for North Carolina. Interventions to Support Children's Recovery From Neglect-A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1