Assessing Between- and Within-Hospital Differences in Patient Safety Between Medicaid and Privately Insured Hospital Patients.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001270
Anuj Gangopadhyaya
{"title":"Assessing Between- and Within-Hospital Differences in Patient Safety Between Medicaid and Privately Insured Hospital Patients.","authors":"Anuj Gangopadhyaya","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of the study are to investigate differences in rates of adverse safety events between nonelderly adult patients with Medicaid and those with private insurance and to assess whether differences are driven by differences in access to quality hospitals or differences in the quality of care delivered within hospitals.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Inpatient records from 26 states in 2017 were collected from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality's Hospital Cost and Utilization Project.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study measures differences in 11 patient safety indicators between patients with Medicaid coverage and patients with private insurance coverage. I use regression analysis to investigate differences in adverse safety events within hospitals. I further establish hospital-level quality based on overall rates of adverse safety events and use regression analysis to evaluate the difference in the probability of admission to high-quality hospitals.</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction: </strong>This study uses hospital discharge data that is restricted to adults ages 19-64 with Medicaid or private coverage.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Relative to privately insured patients, Medicaid patients had significantly higher rates of adverse safety events on 8 of 11 patient safety indicators, including on 6 of 7 surgery-related patient safety indicators. Medicaid patients experience respiratory failure and sepsis infections at rates that are 2.9 and 2.5 cases per 1000 greater than rates experienced by privately insured patients. After adjusting for demographic characteristics, patient diagnostic classifications and comorbidities, and geographic factors, 6 of 11 differences in patient safety indicators remained large and statistically significant. These differences were unchanged when further including hospital indicators, indicating that Medicaid and privately insured patients receive different quality of care within hospitals. There is little association between overall hospital quality and differences in the probability of admission between Medicaid and privately covered patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicaid patients received lower quality of care, based on patient safety metrics, relative to privately insured patients within the same hospitals. Reducing payer disparities in adverse safety events requires reforming staffing and treatment patterns for Medicaid and privately insured patients within hospitals.</p><p><strong>Study date and location: </strong>Analysis for this study was conducted in 2023 at the Urban Institute and at Loyola University Chicago.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"e135-e141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of the study are to investigate differences in rates of adverse safety events between nonelderly adult patients with Medicaid and those with private insurance and to assess whether differences are driven by differences in access to quality hospitals or differences in the quality of care delivered within hospitals.

Data source: Inpatient records from 26 states in 2017 were collected from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality's Hospital Cost and Utilization Project.

Study design: This study measures differences in 11 patient safety indicators between patients with Medicaid coverage and patients with private insurance coverage. I use regression analysis to investigate differences in adverse safety events within hospitals. I further establish hospital-level quality based on overall rates of adverse safety events and use regression analysis to evaluate the difference in the probability of admission to high-quality hospitals.

Data collection/extraction: This study uses hospital discharge data that is restricted to adults ages 19-64 with Medicaid or private coverage.

Principal findings: Relative to privately insured patients, Medicaid patients had significantly higher rates of adverse safety events on 8 of 11 patient safety indicators, including on 6 of 7 surgery-related patient safety indicators. Medicaid patients experience respiratory failure and sepsis infections at rates that are 2.9 and 2.5 cases per 1000 greater than rates experienced by privately insured patients. After adjusting for demographic characteristics, patient diagnostic classifications and comorbidities, and geographic factors, 6 of 11 differences in patient safety indicators remained large and statistically significant. These differences were unchanged when further including hospital indicators, indicating that Medicaid and privately insured patients receive different quality of care within hospitals. There is little association between overall hospital quality and differences in the probability of admission between Medicaid and privately covered patients.

Conclusions: Medicaid patients received lower quality of care, based on patient safety metrics, relative to privately insured patients within the same hospitals. Reducing payer disparities in adverse safety events requires reforming staffing and treatment patterns for Medicaid and privately insured patients within hospitals.

Study date and location: Analysis for this study was conducted in 2023 at the Urban Institute and at Loyola University Chicago.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医疗补助和私人保险医院患者在医院之间和医院内部的患者安全差异。
研究目的该研究的目的是调查享受医疗补助的非老年成年患者与享受私人保险的非老年成年患者之间在不良安全事件发生率方面的差异,并评估这种差异是否是由优质医院就诊机会的差异或医院内提供的护理质量的差异造成的:研究设计:本研究测量了医疗补助覆盖患者与私人保险覆盖患者在 11 项患者安全指标上的差异。我采用回归分析法调查医院内部不良安全事件的差异。根据不良安全事件的总体发生率,我进一步确定了医院层面的质量,并利用回归分析评估了入住高质量医院的概率差异:本研究使用的医院出院数据仅限于 19-64 岁、享受医疗补助或私人保险的成年人:与私人保险患者相比,在11项患者安全指标中的8项指标上,医疗补助患者的不良安全事件发生率明显高于私人保险患者,其中包括7项手术相关患者安全指标中的6项。医疗补助患者的呼吸衰竭和败血症感染率分别比私人保险患者高出 2.9 和 2.5 例/1000。在对人口统计学特征、患者诊断分类和合并症以及地理因素进行调整后,11 项患者安全指标中仍有 6 项差异较大,且具有统计学意义。在进一步纳入医院指标后,这些差异保持不变,表明医疗补助和私人保险患者在医院内接受的护理质量不同。医院整体质量与医疗补助和私人保险患者的入院概率差异之间几乎没有关联:结论:根据患者安全指标,在同一家医院中,医疗补助患者接受的护理质量低于私人保险患者。要减少支付方在不良安全事件方面的差异,就必须改革医院内针对医疗补助和私人保险患者的人员配备和治疗模式:本研究的分析工作于 2023 年在城市研究所和芝加哥洛约拉大学进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 Treated in Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home Program. Exploring the Relationship Between Hospital Patient Safety Culture and Performance on Measures of Hospital-Acquired Conditions. Patient Safety and Perception of Quality in University Dental Hospitals: A French National Survey. Rethinking Surgical Safety: Investigating the Impact of Gamified Training on Severe Flow Disruptions in Surgery. Second Victims in Mental Health Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1