Effect of Adding Stem Extension to a Short-Keeled Knee Implant on the Risk of Tibial Loosening: a Historical Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00833
Hamidreza Yazdi, Sina Talebi, Mohammad Razi, Mohammad Mahdi Sarzaeem, Ataollah Moshirabadi, Mehdi Mohammadpour, Sina Seiri, Moein Ghaeini, Soroush Alaeddini, Mansour Abolghasemian
{"title":"Effect of Adding Stem Extension to a Short-Keeled Knee Implant on the Risk of Tibial Loosening: a Historical Cohort Study.","authors":"Hamidreza Yazdi, Sina Talebi, Mohammad Razi, Mohammad Mahdi Sarzaeem, Ataollah Moshirabadi, Mehdi Mohammadpour, Sina Seiri, Moein Ghaeini, Soroush Alaeddini, Mansour Abolghasemian","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-keeled tibial implants may be at higher risk of aseptic loosening. Stem augmentation has been suggested to improve its fixation. We aimed to assess whether this technique could decrease the loosening rate of such tibial implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied the knees receiving stemmed versus nonstemmed versions of a short-keeled prosthesis. A total of 932 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a Persona prosthesis with >24-month follow-up (mean 53.7) were included, of whom 212 were at high risk of loosening due to osteoporosis or high body mass index (BMI). The rate of tibial aseptic loosening in high-risk patients and in the whole cohort was compared between those with and without stem extension. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors of loosening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the whole cohort, in 203 knees (21.8%), a cemented short stem was used, versus 729 knees (78.2%) without. The tibial implant revision rates for loosening were 2.06% and 0.99% for nonstemmed and stemmed cases, respectively (P = 0.551). When the cohort was categorized based on the loosening risk factors, the loosening risk was significantly higher in the high-risk than in the low-risk group, regardless of stem status (log-rank test = 8.1, hazard ratio = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.78, 2.57, P = 0.005). 212 patients were at high risk of loosening, due to high BMI or osteoporosis, among whom the risk of aseptic loosening was higher when a stem was not used (log-rank = 32.1, hazard ratio = 4.95, 95% CI = 4.05, 5.86, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, osteoporosis, BMI ≥35, and smoking were correlated with loosening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The failure rate was markedly lower in the stemmed group of the patients at elevated risk of aseptic loosening due to osteoporosis and/or high BMI. In the entire cohort, the risk of loosening in stemmed tibial implants was similar to the nonstemmed group. The findings support a protective role for the stem in patients at high risk of failure of the cemented tibial implant.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III therapeutic.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00833","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Short-keeled tibial implants may be at higher risk of aseptic loosening. Stem augmentation has been suggested to improve its fixation. We aimed to assess whether this technique could decrease the loosening rate of such tibial implants.

Methods: We retrospectively studied the knees receiving stemmed versus nonstemmed versions of a short-keeled prosthesis. A total of 932 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a Persona prosthesis with >24-month follow-up (mean 53.7) were included, of whom 212 were at high risk of loosening due to osteoporosis or high body mass index (BMI). The rate of tibial aseptic loosening in high-risk patients and in the whole cohort was compared between those with and without stem extension. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors of loosening.

Results: In the whole cohort, in 203 knees (21.8%), a cemented short stem was used, versus 729 knees (78.2%) without. The tibial implant revision rates for loosening were 2.06% and 0.99% for nonstemmed and stemmed cases, respectively (P = 0.551). When the cohort was categorized based on the loosening risk factors, the loosening risk was significantly higher in the high-risk than in the low-risk group, regardless of stem status (log-rank test = 8.1, hazard ratio = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.78, 2.57, P = 0.005). 212 patients were at high risk of loosening, due to high BMI or osteoporosis, among whom the risk of aseptic loosening was higher when a stem was not used (log-rank = 32.1, hazard ratio = 4.95, 95% CI = 4.05, 5.86, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, osteoporosis, BMI ≥35, and smoking were correlated with loosening.

Conclusion: The failure rate was markedly lower in the stemmed group of the patients at elevated risk of aseptic loosening due to osteoporosis and/or high BMI. In the entire cohort, the risk of loosening in stemmed tibial implants was similar to the nonstemmed group. The findings support a protective role for the stem in patients at high risk of failure of the cemented tibial implant.

Level of evidence: III therapeutic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在短胫骨膝关节假体上增加柄延伸对胫骨松动风险的影响:一项历史队列研究。
背景:短骨胫骨植入物发生无菌性松动的风险较高。有人建议通过茎突增强来改善其固定。我们的目的是评估这种技术能否降低此类胫骨假体的松动率:我们回顾性研究了接受有柄与无柄短骨钉假体的膝关节。共纳入了 932 名使用 Persona 假体接受全膝关节置换术的患者,随访时间超过 24 个月(平均 53.7 个月),其中 212 名患者因骨质疏松症或体重指数(BMI)过高而面临松动的高风险。对高风险患者和整个队列中胫骨无菌性松动的发生率进行了比较,有无骨干延伸。进行多变量分析以确定松动的风险因素:在整个队列中,203个膝关节(21.8%)使用了骨水泥短柄,而729个膝关节(78.2%)没有使用。未使用骨水泥短柄和使用骨水泥短柄的病例中,胫骨假体松动翻修率分别为2.06%和0.99%(P = 0.551)。根据松动风险因素对组群进行分类时,无论骨干状态如何,高风险组的松动风险均显著高于低风险组(对数秩检验 = 8.1,危险比 = 2.17,95% CI = 1.78,2.57,P = 0.005)。212名患者因高体重指数(BMI)或骨质疏松症而具有高松动风险,其中未使用骨干的患者发生无菌性松动的风险更高(对数秩检验 = 32.1,危险比 = 4.95,95% CI = 4.05,5.86,P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,骨质疏松症、体重指数≥35和吸烟与松动相关:结论:在因骨质疏松症和/或高体重指数导致无菌性松动风险较高的患者中,截骨组的失败率明显较低。在整个队列中,有柄胫骨植入物的松动风险与无柄组相似。研究结果表明,在骨水泥胫骨植入物失败风险较高的患者中,骨干具有保护作用:III 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Influence of Single Payer Health Insurance on Socioeconomic Disparities in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Utilization: A Transnational Analysis. Patellofemoral Instability Part II: Surgical Treatment. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip. Femoral Head Fractures: Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes. Trends in Preoperative Outcome Measures From 2013 to 2021 in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1