Investigating the utility of the AQ-10 in children and adolescents assessed in an outpatient ARFID clinic

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Autism Research Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1002/aur.3220
Tanith Archibald, Emma Willmott, Cate Kelly, Louise Bradbury, Pippa Hugo, Rachel Bryant-Waugh
{"title":"Investigating the utility of the AQ-10 in children and adolescents assessed in an outpatient ARFID clinic","authors":"Tanith Archibald,&nbsp;Emma Willmott,&nbsp;Cate Kelly,&nbsp;Louise Bradbury,&nbsp;Pippa Hugo,&nbsp;Rachel Bryant-Waugh","doi":"10.1002/aur.3220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The high co-occurrence of autism and eating disorders is well established, including for those with Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID). It is therefore important to consider autism and identify possible autism when people present to eating disorder services to ascertain whether further assessment is indicated, to support clinical formulation and to make appropriate adaptations during interventions. This paper explores the utility of a validated autism screening measure, the AQ-10, in a population of children and adolescents who presented to an outpatient eating disorders clinic for an assessment of possible ARFID. Over 19 months, 335 young people were assessed and 246 families with children aged between 4 and 17 years completed one of three versions of the AQ-10 (Child, Adolescent, and Adult), as part of a battery of routinely administered pre-assessment questionnaires. Results indicated that 80.2% (<i>n</i> = 69) of those with an existing autism diagnosis scored above clinical threshold of ≥6 (M = 7.2, SD = 1.9), 43.9% (<i>n</i> = 43) of those queried to be autistic scored above clinical threshold (M = 5.2, SD = 2.5), and 6.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) of non-autistic individuals scored above clinical threshold (M = 2.8, SD = 1.8). Additionally, the AQ-10 satisfactorily discriminated between those with a known autism diagnosis and those who are not autistic across all age groups and sex. We conclude that the AQ-10, alongside a comprehensive clinical assessment and clinical judgment, is a useful screening tool that can support clinicians to identify appropriate onward referrals for autism assessments, aid clinical formulation, and consider appropriate adaptations and reasonable adjustments during ARFID interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"17 9","pages":"1867-1875"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.3220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high co-occurrence of autism and eating disorders is well established, including for those with Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID). It is therefore important to consider autism and identify possible autism when people present to eating disorder services to ascertain whether further assessment is indicated, to support clinical formulation and to make appropriate adaptations during interventions. This paper explores the utility of a validated autism screening measure, the AQ-10, in a population of children and adolescents who presented to an outpatient eating disorders clinic for an assessment of possible ARFID. Over 19 months, 335 young people were assessed and 246 families with children aged between 4 and 17 years completed one of three versions of the AQ-10 (Child, Adolescent, and Adult), as part of a battery of routinely administered pre-assessment questionnaires. Results indicated that 80.2% (n = 69) of those with an existing autism diagnosis scored above clinical threshold of ≥6 (M = 7.2, SD = 1.9), 43.9% (n = 43) of those queried to be autistic scored above clinical threshold (M = 5.2, SD = 2.5), and 6.5% (n = 4) of non-autistic individuals scored above clinical threshold (M = 2.8, SD = 1.8). Additionally, the AQ-10 satisfactorily discriminated between those with a known autism diagnosis and those who are not autistic across all age groups and sex. We conclude that the AQ-10, alongside a comprehensive clinical assessment and clinical judgment, is a useful screening tool that can support clinicians to identify appropriate onward referrals for autism assessments, aid clinical formulation, and consider appropriate adaptations and reasonable adjustments during ARFID interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究 AQ-10 在 ARFID 门诊儿童和青少年中的实用性。
自闭症和进食障碍的高并发率已得到证实,包括那些患有回避性限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)的患者。因此,在饮食失调症患者就诊时,必须考虑到自闭症并识别可能存在的自闭症,以确定是否需要进行进一步评估、支持临床方案制定并在干预过程中做出适当调整。本文探讨了经过验证的自闭症筛查量表 AQ-10 在儿童和青少年人群中的实用性,这些儿童和青少年到饮食失调门诊就诊,要求对可能存在的 ARFID 进行评估。在 19 个月的时间里,共有 335 名青少年接受了评估,246 个有 4 至 17 岁子女的家庭完成了 AQ-10(儿童、青少年和成人)三个版本中的一个版本,作为常规评估前问卷的一部分。结果显示,80.2%(n = 69)的已有自闭症诊断者的得分高于临床阈值≥6(M = 7.2,SD = 1.9),43.9%(n = 43)的被询问自闭症患者的得分高于临床阈值(M = 5.2,SD = 2.5),6.5%(n = 4)的非自闭症患者的得分高于临床阈值(M = 2.8,SD = 1.8)。此外,在所有年龄组和性别中,AQ-10 对已知自闭症诊断者和非自闭症患者的区分度都令人满意。我们的结论是,AQ-10与全面的临床评估和临床判断相结合,是一种有用的筛查工具,可帮助临床医生确定适当的自闭症评估转介,帮助临床制定方案,并在ARFID干预过程中考虑适当的适应和合理的调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Parental age at birth, telomere length, and autism spectrum disorders in the UK Biobank cohort Regional differences in autism and intellectual disability risk associated with cesarean section delivery Issue Information Expanding perspectives on figurative language processing in autism spectrum disorder: A commentary on Lampri et al.'s review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1