It is high time to discard a cut-off of 0.70 in the diagnosis of COPD.

Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2024.2397480
Joon Young Choi, Chin Kook Rhee
{"title":"It is high time to discard a cut-off of 0.70 in the diagnosis of COPD.","authors":"Joon Young Choi, Chin Kook Rhee","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2024.2397480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has traditionally been diagnosed based on the criterion of an FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC <0.70. However, this definition has limitations as it may only detect patients with later-stage disease, when pathologic changes have become irreversible. Consequently, it potentially omits individuals with early-stage disease, in whom the pathologic changes could be delayed or reversed.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review summarizes recent evidence regarding early-stage COPD, which may not fulfill the spirometric criteria but nonetheless exhibits features of COPD or is at risk of future COPD progression.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>A comprehensive approach, including symptoms assessment, various physiologic tests, and radiologic features, is required to diagnose COPD. This approach is necessary to identify currently underdiagnosed patients and to halt disease progression in at- risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"709-719"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2397480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has traditionally been diagnosed based on the criterion of an FEV1/FVC <0.70. However, this definition has limitations as it may only detect patients with later-stage disease, when pathologic changes have become irreversible. Consequently, it potentially omits individuals with early-stage disease, in whom the pathologic changes could be delayed or reversed.

Areas covered: This narrative review summarizes recent evidence regarding early-stage COPD, which may not fulfill the spirometric criteria but nonetheless exhibits features of COPD or is at risk of future COPD progression.

Expert opinion: A comprehensive approach, including symptoms assessment, various physiologic tests, and radiologic features, is required to diagnose COPD. This approach is necessary to identify currently underdiagnosed patients and to halt disease progression in at- risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在诊断慢性阻塞性肺病时,现在应该摒弃 0.70 的临界值。
导言:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的传统诊断标准是FEV1/FVC区域覆盖率:本综述总结了有关早期慢性阻塞性肺病的最新证据,早期慢性阻塞性肺病可能不符合肺活量测定标准,但表现出慢性阻塞性肺病的特征,或有慢性阻塞性肺病未来发展的风险:专家观点:诊断慢性阻塞性肺病需要采用综合方法,包括症状评估、各种生理测试和放射学特征。这种方法对于发现目前诊断不足的患者和阻止高危患者的疾病进展非常必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute respiratory failure in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Measuring exhaled nitric oxide in COPD: from theoretical consideration to practical views. Is the nicotine metabolite ratio a useful tool to improve the effectiveness, safety, and adherence to quitting smoking? Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. An update on endobronchial valve therapy for severe emphysema: real world data and special indications. What is new in synthetic lung surfactant protein technology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1