Cystic Duct Exploration in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Yingfeng Zhang, Kang Wang, Jiuping Li
{"title":"Cystic Duct Exploration in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Yingfeng Zhang, Kang Wang, Jiuping Li","doi":"10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile duct injury (BDI) is a severe complication following cholecystectomy and is therefore a particularly concerning surgical predicament for hepatobiliary surgeons. Owing to very high medical compensation awarded to patients suffering from BDI, surgeons need to exercise caution during surgery to avoid BDI. Herein, we explored a novel method to identify cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), expanding the applicability of this surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving LC between April 2021 and October 2022 at the Gaoyou People's Hospital were included in this retrospective clinical study and divided into two groups according to whether the cystic duct was incised (one group with LC alone, while another with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and cystic duct exploration [LCCDE]). Clinical and baseline characteristics of patients were collected, and the preoperative and postoperative biochemical parameters were compared. The surgical outcomes of LCCDE were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients had undergone LC, while 162 patients had received LCCDE as treatment. There were no significant differences in age, gender, common bile duct diameter, preoperative and postoperative biochemical parameters between the two groups. No significant difference in the mean operation time between the LC and LCCDE groups was noted (<i>p</i> = 0.409). In the LCCDE group, white secretions in the cystic duct were observed in 92 patients (56.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of intraoperative white secretions in the cystic duct may further confirm the presence of cystic duct, thereby enabling earlier detection of BDI. Importantly, LCCDE, as the new surgical method explored in this study, does not extend the operation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":93980,"journal":{"name":"Discovery medicine","volume":"36 187","pages":"1715-1720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discovery medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) is a severe complication following cholecystectomy and is therefore a particularly concerning surgical predicament for hepatobiliary surgeons. Owing to very high medical compensation awarded to patients suffering from BDI, surgeons need to exercise caution during surgery to avoid BDI. Herein, we explored a novel method to identify cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), expanding the applicability of this surgical approach.

Methods: Patients receiving LC between April 2021 and October 2022 at the Gaoyou People's Hospital were included in this retrospective clinical study and divided into two groups according to whether the cystic duct was incised (one group with LC alone, while another with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and cystic duct exploration [LCCDE]). Clinical and baseline characteristics of patients were collected, and the preoperative and postoperative biochemical parameters were compared. The surgical outcomes of LCCDE were observed.

Results: A total of 114 patients had undergone LC, while 162 patients had received LCCDE as treatment. There were no significant differences in age, gender, common bile duct diameter, preoperative and postoperative biochemical parameters between the two groups. No significant difference in the mean operation time between the LC and LCCDE groups was noted (p = 0.409). In the LCCDE group, white secretions in the cystic duct were observed in 92 patients (56.8%).

Conclusions: The presence of intraoperative white secretions in the cystic duct may further confirm the presence of cystic duct, thereby enabling earlier detection of BDI. Importantly, LCCDE, as the new surgical method explored in this study, does not extend the operation time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的胆囊导管探查。
背景:胆管损伤(BDI)是胆囊切除术后的一种严重并发症,因此是肝胆外科医生特别关注的手术困境。由于胆管损伤患者可获得高额医疗赔偿,外科医生在手术过程中需要谨慎行事,以避免胆管损伤。在此,我们探索了一种在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中识别囊性导管的新方法,从而扩大了这种手术方法的适用范围:方法:将2021年4月至2022年10月期间在高邮市人民医院接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者纳入这项回顾性临床研究,并根据是否切开胆囊管分为两组(一组为单纯腹腔镜胆囊切除术,另一组为腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆囊管探查术[LCCDE])。研究人员收集了患者的临床和基线特征,并比较了术前和术后的生化指标。观察 LCCDE 的手术效果:结果:共有 114 名患者接受了 LC,162 名患者接受了 LCCDE 治疗。两组患者的年龄、性别、胆总管直径、术前和术后生化指标无明显差异。LC组和LCCDE组的平均手术时间无明显差异(P = 0.409)。在 LCCDE 组中,92 名患者(56.8%)的膀胱导管中观察到白色分泌物:结论:术中在膀胱导管中发现白色分泌物可进一步确认膀胱导管的存在,从而更早地发现 BDI。重要的是,LCCDE 作为本研究探索的新手术方法,不会延长手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CKAP2L Plays a Pivotal Role in Colorectal Cancer Progression via the Dual Regulation of Cell Cycle and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Fruit Acid Inhibits UV-Induced Skin Aging via PI3K/Akt and NF-κB Pathway Inhibition. Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Organic Erectile Dysfunction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Erectile Dysfunction. Carbamazepine Inhibits Lung Cancer Metastasis by Suppressing Chemokine Receptor 4 Expression. Clinical Application of a Big Data Machine Learning Analysis Model for Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Assessment Built on Multicenter Clinical Data in Qingdao City.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1