Statistical Modeling of Within-Laboratory Precision Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Approach.

Daisuke Miyake, Shigehiko Kanaya, Naoaki Ono
{"title":"Statistical Modeling of Within-Laboratory Precision Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Approach.","authors":"Daisuke Miyake, Shigehiko Kanaya, Naoaki Ono","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reproducibility has been well studied in the field of food analysis; the RSD is said to follow a Horwitz curve with certain exceptions. However, little systematic research has been done on predicting repeatability or intermediate precision.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We developed a regression method to estimate within-laboratory SDs using hierarchical Bayesian modeling and analyzing duplicate measurement data obtained from actual laboratory tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method was employed and implemented using R with Stan. The basic structure of the statistical model was assumed to be a Chi-squared distribution, the fixed effect of the predictor was assumed to be a nonlinear function with a constant term and a concentration-dependent term, and the random effects were assumed to follow a lognormal distribution as a hierarchical prior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By analyzing over 300 instances, we obtained regression results that fit well with the assumed model, except for moisture, which was a method-defined analyte. The developed method applies to a wide variety of analytes measured using general principles, including spectroscopy, GC, and HPLC. Although the estimated precisions were within the Horwitz ratio criteria for repeatability, some cases using high-sensitivity detectors, such as mass spectrometers, showed SDs below that range.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose utilizing the within-laboratory precision predicted by the model established in this study for internal QC and measurement uncertainty estimation without considering sample matrices.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Performing statistical modeling on data from double analysis, which is conducted as a part of internal QCs, will simplify the estimation of the precision that fits each analytical system in a laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"960-970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsae069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reproducibility has been well studied in the field of food analysis; the RSD is said to follow a Horwitz curve with certain exceptions. However, little systematic research has been done on predicting repeatability or intermediate precision.

Objective: We developed a regression method to estimate within-laboratory SDs using hierarchical Bayesian modeling and analyzing duplicate measurement data obtained from actual laboratory tests.

Methods: The Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method was employed and implemented using R with Stan. The basic structure of the statistical model was assumed to be a Chi-squared distribution, the fixed effect of the predictor was assumed to be a nonlinear function with a constant term and a concentration-dependent term, and the random effects were assumed to follow a lognormal distribution as a hierarchical prior.

Results: By analyzing over 300 instances, we obtained regression results that fit well with the assumed model, except for moisture, which was a method-defined analyte. The developed method applies to a wide variety of analytes measured using general principles, including spectroscopy, GC, and HPLC. Although the estimated precisions were within the Horwitz ratio criteria for repeatability, some cases using high-sensitivity detectors, such as mass spectrometers, showed SDs below that range.

Conclusion: We propose utilizing the within-laboratory precision predicted by the model established in this study for internal QC and measurement uncertainty estimation without considering sample matrices.

Highlights: Performing statistical modeling on data from double analysis, which is conducted as a part of internal QCs, will simplify the estimation of the precision that fits each analytical system in a laboratory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用层次贝叶斯方法建立实验室内精确度的统计模型。
背景:食品分析领域对可重复性进行了深入研究;据说相对标准偏差遵循霍维茨曲线,但也有一些例外情况。然而,在预测可重复性或中间精度方面却鲜有系统的研究:我们开发了一种回归方法,利用分层贝叶斯建模和分析从实际实验室测试中获得的重复测量数据来估计实验室内的标准偏差:方法:采用哈密尔顿蒙特卡洛方法,并使用 R 和 Stan 加以实现。统计模型的基本结构假定为卡方分布,预测因子的固定效应假定为包含常数项和浓度依赖项的非线性函数,随机效应假定为遵循对数正态分布的分层先验:通过分析 300 多个实例,我们得到的回归结果与假定模型非常吻合,但水分除外,因为水分是一种方法定义的分析物。所开发的方法适用于利用一般原理测量的各种分析物,包括光谱、气相色谱和高效液相色谱。虽然估计的精确度在 HorRat(r) 标准范围内,但在使用高灵敏度检测器(如质谱仪)的某些情况下,标准偏差低于该范围:结论:我们建议在不考虑样品基质的情况下,利用本研究建立的模型所预测的实验室内部精确度来进行内部质量控制和测量不确定性估计:重点:作为内部质量控制的一部分,对来自双重分析的数据进行统计建模将简化对适合实验室中每个分析系统的精度的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of the QuEChERSER Method for 245 Pesticides and Environmental Contaminants in Barley and Hemp by Low-Pressure GC: Comparison of Triple Quadrupole MS/MS and Orbitrap HRMS for Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. FraMiTrACR: A Sustainable and Economical Technology for Analytical Sample Preparation. Proof of Concept: Autonomous Machine Vision Software for Botanical Identification. Influence of Talc in Polypropylene on Total Fluorine Measurements Used as an Indicator of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Validation of the Level 2 Modification for the Neogen® Molecular Detection Assay 2 - Salmonella Enteritidis/Salmonella Typhimurium Method for Detection of the Monophasic Variant Salmonella enterica  1,4,[5],12:-:1,2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1