Laypersons' perception of smile esthetics from different backgrounds.

Q2 Dentistry Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Fereshteh Najarzadegan, Faezeh Eslamipour
{"title":"Laypersons' perception of smile esthetics from different backgrounds.","authors":"Fereshteh Najarzadegan, Faezeh Eslamipour","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smile esthetics can be subjective. This study aims to assess the effect of culture/geographic location on judging smile esthetics by comparing the perception of smile characteristics between American laypersons (Western culture) and Iranians (Eastern).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred residents from each country were recruited for this analytical cross-sectional study. A frontal picture of a posed smile with standard norms which are mentioned in the Contemporary Orthodontics textbook by William R. Proffit was selected. Adobe Photoshop 7 was used to alter midline diastema, gingival display (GD), maxillary midline-to-face discrepancy, buccal corridor (BC), and smile arc. Images were given to groups to determine the most attractive and acceptable smile. Data were analyzed by Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Spearman correlation coefficient in SPSS-22 (α =0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Americans were less critical in judging diastema (<i>P</i> < 0.001), GD (<i>P</i> = 0.013), and BC (<i>P</i> = 0.004) for smile attractiveness than Iranians. No difference was between the two groups in choosing the acceptability threshold and determining the most attractive smile except for BC (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, Americans were more tolerant of variations in smile characteristics than Iranians. Both groups agreed on most smiles. Therefore, it seems that it is reasonable to use similar standards for smile characteristics while considering the small differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Smile esthetics can be subjective. This study aims to assess the effect of culture/geographic location on judging smile esthetics by comparing the perception of smile characteristics between American laypersons (Western culture) and Iranians (Eastern).

Materials and methods: One hundred residents from each country were recruited for this analytical cross-sectional study. A frontal picture of a posed smile with standard norms which are mentioned in the Contemporary Orthodontics textbook by William R. Proffit was selected. Adobe Photoshop 7 was used to alter midline diastema, gingival display (GD), maxillary midline-to-face discrepancy, buccal corridor (BC), and smile arc. Images were given to groups to determine the most attractive and acceptable smile. Data were analyzed by Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Spearman correlation coefficient in SPSS-22 (α =0.05).

Results: Americans were less critical in judging diastema (P < 0.001), GD (P = 0.013), and BC (P = 0.004) for smile attractiveness than Iranians. No difference was between the two groups in choosing the acceptability threshold and determining the most attractive smile except for BC (P = 0.002).

Conclusion: Overall, Americans were more tolerant of variations in smile characteristics than Iranians. Both groups agreed on most smiles. Therefore, it seems that it is reasonable to use similar standards for smile characteristics while considering the small differences.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同背景的普通人对微笑美学的看法。
背景介绍微笑美学可能是主观的。本研究旨在通过比较美国普通人(西方文化)和伊朗人(东方文化)对微笑特征的感知,评估文化/地理位置对微笑美学判断的影响:本次分析性横断面研究从两个国家各招募了 100 名居民。选取了一张正面微笑照片,该照片符合威廉-R-普罗菲特(William R. Proffit)所著《当代正畸学》(Contemporary Orthodontics)教科书中提到的标准规范。使用 Adobe Photoshop 7 更改中线间距、牙龈显示(GD)、上颌中线与面部间距、颊侧走廊(BC)和微笑弧度。将图片分发给各组,以确定最有吸引力和最容易接受的微笑。数据采用 SPSS-22 中的 Chi-square、Mann-Whitney 和 Spearman 相关系数进行分析(α =0.05):与伊朗人相比,美国人在微笑吸引力方面对舒展度(P < 0.001)、GD(P = 0.013)和BC(P = 0.004)的判断不那么挑剔。除 BC(P = 0.002)外,两组在选择可接受性阈值和确定最具吸引力的微笑方面没有差异:总的来说,美国人比伊朗人更能容忍微笑特征的变化。两组人对大多数微笑的看法一致。因此,在考虑微小差异的同时使用相似的微笑特征标准似乎是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
In vitro antibacterial effect of a nano-zinc oxide eugenol sealer alone and in combination with chitosan, propolis, and nanosilver on Enterococcus faecalis. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing efficacy of calcium sodium phosphosilicate, ginger, turmeric, and fluoride. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of tribulus terrestris methanolic extract against Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An in vitro study. Masking ability of computer-aided design and manufacturing bleach shade ceramics with different thicknesses on titanium abutments. Evaluating the effect of amalgam fillings on caries detection in cone-beam computed tomography images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1