Allogeneic serum-based eye drops may give better results than autologous drops in Sjögren's syndrome dry eye

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion and Apheresis Science Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2024.103991
Joanna Janus, Katarzyna Chmielewska, Jolanta Antoniewicz-Papis
{"title":"Allogeneic serum-based eye drops may give better results than autologous drops in Sjögren's syndrome dry eye","authors":"Joanna Janus,&nbsp;Katarzyna Chmielewska,&nbsp;Jolanta Antoniewicz-Papis","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2024.103991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) may cause severe dry eye symptoms. One of the therapeutic option known for almost 40 years are autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs). Due to the presence of many pro-inflammatory factors in the autologous serum of SS patients, the use of allogeneic serum is often considered a better option. In our facility almost one-fifth of the patients using allogeneic serum-based eye drops (alloSEDs) suffered from autoimmune diseases, including SS. The study aim was to compare the effectiveness of both ASEDs and alloSEDs in SS patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From the group of SS patients using alloSEDs, five female SS patients aged 39–73 years were selected. They had the longest history of the use of the product. The analysis was based on OSDI forms and internal questionnaires which compared the effects of ASEDs and alloSEDs application. The patients used alloSEDs for a period of 5–28 months. All had previously used ASEDs for at least 2 years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For all five patients the mean OSDI after application of ASEDs and before introducing alloSEDs was 68.71, while the mean OSDI after the use of alloSEDs was 30.49.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In SS the treatment results are better with alloSEDs than with ASEDs. Almost all SS patients who applied both autologous and allogeneic drops reported better effects with the latter as also confirmed by the study cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"63 5","pages":"Article 103991"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224001629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) may cause severe dry eye symptoms. One of the therapeutic option known for almost 40 years are autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs). Due to the presence of many pro-inflammatory factors in the autologous serum of SS patients, the use of allogeneic serum is often considered a better option. In our facility almost one-fifth of the patients using allogeneic serum-based eye drops (alloSEDs) suffered from autoimmune diseases, including SS. The study aim was to compare the effectiveness of both ASEDs and alloSEDs in SS patients.

Methods

From the group of SS patients using alloSEDs, five female SS patients aged 39–73 years were selected. They had the longest history of the use of the product. The analysis was based on OSDI forms and internal questionnaires which compared the effects of ASEDs and alloSEDs application. The patients used alloSEDs for a period of 5–28 months. All had previously used ASEDs for at least 2 years.

Results

For all five patients the mean OSDI after application of ASEDs and before introducing alloSEDs was 68.71, while the mean OSDI after the use of alloSEDs was 30.49.

Conclusion

In SS the treatment results are better with alloSEDs than with ASEDs. Almost all SS patients who applied both autologous and allogeneic drops reported better effects with the latter as also confirmed by the study cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在治疗斯约格伦综合征干眼症时,异体血清滴眼液可能比自体滴眼液效果更好
目的 薛格伦综合征(SS)可能导致严重的干眼症状。自体血清滴眼液(ASEDs)是近 40 年来众所周知的治疗方法之一。由于 SS 患者的自体血清中存在许多促炎因子,使用异体血清通常被认为是更好的选择。在我院使用异体血清滴眼液(alloSEDs)的患者中,近五分之一患有自身免疫性疾病,包括 SS。研究目的是比较 ASED 和 alloSED 对 SS 患者的疗效。她们使用该产品的时间最长。分析以 OSDI 表格和内部问卷为基础,比较了 ASEDs 和 alloSEDs 的使用效果。患者使用 alloSEDs 的时间为 5-28 个月。结果在所有五名患者中,使用 ASEDs 后和引入 alloSEDs 前的平均 OSDI 为 68.71,而使用 alloSEDs 后的平均 OSDI 为 30.49。几乎所有同时使用自体和异体滴眼液的 SS 患者都表示使用异体滴眼液效果更好,研究病例也证实了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues. Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic insights from a pilot exploratory study of the dynamic proteomic changes during plasma exchange in patients with acute liver failure. Editorial commentary: The latest viewpoint on a statistical analysis of total analytical errors in diagnostic tools used for quantitative testing of medical devices in transfusion medicine & insights on the development of autoantibody isotypes to the Annexin A1 protein of the neutrophil in association with COVID-19-induced hyperinflammatory processes Laboratory measurement of autoantibodies to Annexin A1: Review and measurements in health and COVID-19 A non-parametric framework for evaluating total analytical error in in vitro diagnostic medical devices in transfusion medicine International forum: WAA meets in Yogaykarta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1