Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and risk of meniscus injury: Exploring the safest delay interval

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70006
Ghuna Arioharjo Utoyo, Dliyauddin Fachri,  Calvin
{"title":"Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and risk of meniscus injury: Exploring the safest delay interval","authors":"Ghuna Arioharjo Utoyo,&nbsp;Dliyauddin Fachri,&nbsp; Calvin","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The duration for which anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be delayed without resulting in a risk of subsequent meniscus injury has remained a debatable topic. The main purpose of this study was to determine the safest delay interval for a delayed ACLR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included all patients who underwent ACLR between January 2020 and January 2022. The patients were divided into four groups based on the delay interval: &lt;3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months and &gt;12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) at 1-year postoperatively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 95 patients were included in this study. ACLR delay of 3–6 months was not associated with the risk of meniscus injury, while a delay of 6–12 months (odds ratio [OR] = 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13–16.79; <i>p</i> = 0.031) and &gt;12 months (OR = 10.68; 95% CI = 2.55–42.22; <i>p</i> = 0.001) was associated with a likelihood of developing meniscus injury. Meniscus injury risk increased by 12% for each month of ACLR delay (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.04–1.22; <i>p</i> = 0.003). Regarding clinical outcomes at 1-year postoperatively, all groups exhibit the same clinical results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ACLR can be safely delayed up to 6 months after the initial injury. However, a delay for &gt;6 months must be avoided, as it was found to significantly increase the likelihood of developing a meniscus injury.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The duration for which anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be delayed without resulting in a risk of subsequent meniscus injury has remained a debatable topic. The main purpose of this study was to determine the safest delay interval for a delayed ACLR.

Methods

This retrospective study included all patients who underwent ACLR between January 2020 and January 2022. The patients were divided into four groups based on the delay interval: <3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months and >12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) at 1-year postoperatively.

Results

A total of 95 patients were included in this study. ACLR delay of 3–6 months was not associated with the risk of meniscus injury, while a delay of 6–12 months (odds ratio [OR] = 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13–16.79; p = 0.031) and >12 months (OR = 10.68; 95% CI = 2.55–42.22; p = 0.001) was associated with a likelihood of developing meniscus injury. Meniscus injury risk increased by 12% for each month of ACLR delay (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.04–1.22; p = 0.003). Regarding clinical outcomes at 1-year postoperatively, all groups exhibit the same clinical results.

Conclusion

ACLR can be safely delayed up to 6 months after the initial injury. However, a delay for >6 months must be avoided, as it was found to significantly increase the likelihood of developing a meniscus injury.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延迟前十字韧带重建与半月板损伤风险:探索最安全的延迟时间间隔
目的 前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)可以延迟多长时间而不会导致随后半月板损伤的风险,这一直是一个有争议的话题。本研究的主要目的是确定延迟前交叉韧带重建最安全的延迟时间间隔。 方法 这项回顾性研究纳入了 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间接受 ACLR 的所有患者。根据延迟时间将患者分为四组:3 个月、3-6 个月、6-12 个月和 12 个月。术后1年使用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分和膝关节损伤与骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)评估临床结果。 结果 本研究共纳入 95 名患者。ACLR 延迟 3-6 个月与半月板损伤的风险无关,而延迟 6-12 个月(几率比 [OR] = 4.35;95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.13-16.79;p = 0.031)和 12 个月(OR = 10.68;95% CI = 2.55-42.22;p = 0.001)与发生半月板损伤的可能性有关。前交叉韧带重建每延迟一个月,半月板损伤风险就增加12%(OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.04-1.22; p = 0.003)。关于术后 1 年的临床结果,所有组别均表现出相同的临床结果。 结论 ACLR 可以安全地延迟到初次损伤后 6 个月。但是,必须避免延迟 6 个月,因为这将显著增加半月板损伤的可能性。 证据等级 III 级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae Anteroposterior axis of the tibia for kinematic aligned total knee arthroplasty Radiographic acceptable zone of endobutton placement in ACL reconstruction: A prospective study Does free tendon length influence the injury risk of the Achilles tendon? A finite element study Daily physical activity following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1