Analysis of the PARAGON-HF Study Results Using Win Ratio.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Heart Failure Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011860
Minjae Yoon, Wonse Kim, Woong Kook, Jin Joo Park, Barry Greenberg
{"title":"Analysis of the PARAGON-HF Study Results Using Win Ratio.","authors":"Minjae Yoon, Wonse Kim, Woong Kook, Jin Joo Park, Barry Greenberg","doi":"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The PARAGON-HF study (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) investigated the effect of sacubitril-valsartan in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction. The results, which were analyzed using conventional statistical methods, did not find a significant reduction in the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death and total hospitalization for HF. Recent clinical trials used win ratio statistics that enable the incorporation of multiple outcome aspects into the primary end point and can detect positive outcomes with fewer patients. In this study, we assessed the effect of sacubitril-valsartan on outcomes using the win ratio to analyze results from patients included in the PARAGON-HF study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the PARAGON-HF study, 4822 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction were randomized either to sacubitril-valsartan or valsartan groups. In the present study, the primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of time to cardiovascular death, total number of hospitalization for HF, time to first hospitalization for HF, time to renal composite outcome, and change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score at 8 months analyzed using a win ratio statistical model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using this approach, we found that a greater number of patients who received sacubitril-valsartan experienced clinical benefits compared with those who received valsartan (win ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]; <i>P</i>=0.005). This clinical advantage was evident in patients regardless of whether the left ventricular ejection fraction was above or below the median, that is, the left ventricular ejection fraction of 57%, and regardless of sex (<i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>=0.76 for the left ventricular ejection fraction and 0.73 for sex).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Employing the innovative win ratio approach, sacubitril-valsartan demonstrated significant clinical benefits among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Notably, this benefit was observed irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction and sex.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.</p>","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"e011860"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011860","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The PARAGON-HF study (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) investigated the effect of sacubitril-valsartan in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction. The results, which were analyzed using conventional statistical methods, did not find a significant reduction in the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death and total hospitalization for HF. Recent clinical trials used win ratio statistics that enable the incorporation of multiple outcome aspects into the primary end point and can detect positive outcomes with fewer patients. In this study, we assessed the effect of sacubitril-valsartan on outcomes using the win ratio to analyze results from patients included in the PARAGON-HF study.

Methods: In the PARAGON-HF study, 4822 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction were randomized either to sacubitril-valsartan or valsartan groups. In the present study, the primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of time to cardiovascular death, total number of hospitalization for HF, time to first hospitalization for HF, time to renal composite outcome, and change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score at 8 months analyzed using a win ratio statistical model.

Results: Using this approach, we found that a greater number of patients who received sacubitril-valsartan experienced clinical benefits compared with those who received valsartan (win ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]; P=0.005). This clinical advantage was evident in patients regardless of whether the left ventricular ejection fraction was above or below the median, that is, the left ventricular ejection fraction of 57%, and regardless of sex (Pinteraction=0.76 for the left ventricular ejection fraction and 0.73 for sex).

Conclusions: Employing the innovative win ratio approach, sacubitril-valsartan demonstrated significant clinical benefits among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Notably, this benefit was observed irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction and sex.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用胜率分析 PARAGON-HF 研究结果。
研究背景PARAGON-HF 研究(ARNI 与 ARB 对射血分数保留型心力衰竭总体疗效的前瞻性比较)调查了囊必利-缬沙坦对射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HF)的疗效。采用传统统计方法分析的结果显示,心血管死亡和心力衰竭住院总次数这两项主要复合终点并未显著降低。最近的临床试验采用了赢率统计法,这种方法能将多个结果方面纳入主要终点,并能在较少患者的情况下检测出积极的结果。在本研究中,我们使用赢比分析 PARAGON-HF 研究中患者的结果,评估了沙库比曲-缬沙坦对预后的影响:在PARAGON-HF研究中,4822名射血分数保留的心房颤动患者被随机分配到沙库比特利-缬沙坦组或缬沙坦组。在本研究中,主要研究结果是心血管死亡时间、HF住院总次数、HF首次住院时间、肾脏综合结果时间以及8个月时堪萨斯城心肌病问卷症状总分变化的分层复合结果,并采用胜率统计模型进行分析:通过这种方法,我们发现与接受缬沙坦治疗的患者相比,接受沙库比曲-缬沙坦治疗的患者中有更多的患者获得了临床获益(获益比为 1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]; P=0.005)。无论患者的左心室射血分数是高于还是低于中位数,即左心室射血分数为57%,也无论性别如何,这种临床优势都很明显(左心室射血分数的Pinteraction=0.76,性别的Pinteraction=0.73):采用创新的赢率方法,沙库比特利-缬沙坦在射血分数保留的心房颤动患者中显示出显著的临床疗效。值得注意的是,这种获益与左心室射血分数和性别无关:URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01920711。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
期刊最新文献
Natural Language Processing to Adjudicate Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Global Clinical Trials. A Medical Expert System for Intelligent Telemonitoring of Chronic Heart Failure Patients: Preliminary Validation and Perspectives. Comprehensive Proteomics Profiling Identifies Circulating Biomarkers to Distinguish Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Other Cardiomyopathies with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Mavacamten: Real-World Experience from 22 Months of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program. Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1