Effect of a Novel Adaptive Handle Design on the Ergonomic Performance of Periodontal Curettes in Dental Hygienists with and without Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Pilot Clinical Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.3390/dj12080253
Cherie Wink, Susan Meishan Yang, Ali A Habib, Kairong Lin, Thair Takesh, Petra Wilder-Smith
{"title":"Effect of a Novel Adaptive Handle Design on the Ergonomic Performance of Periodontal Curettes in Dental Hygienists with and without Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Pilot Clinical Study.","authors":"Cherie Wink, Susan Meishan Yang, Ali A Habib, Kairong Lin, Thair Takesh, Petra Wilder-Smith","doi":"10.3390/dj12080253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), discomfort, fatigue, pain, and other acute and chronic work-related injuries are common among dental clinicians. Hand instruments constitute a primary risk factor for these conditions. The overall goal of this study was to compare in dental hygienists with healthy hands, and in those with MSDs, the effect of three different handle designs on instrumentation-related muscle work, comfort, fatigue, and quality of tactile feedback. (2) Methods: Clinicians tested three periodontal curettes: one with a novel adaptive silicone handle, another with a rigid resin handle, and the third with a rigid silicone handle. Ten hygienists-five with MSDs and five without-each scaled three typodonts using the three different curettes. Statistical analysis was performed using a General Linear Model (GLIM) and Tukey's post hoc test, and a significance level of <i>p</i> < 0.05 was implemented. (3) Results: On average, mean comfort and fatigue across all instruments were significantly worse in testers with MSDs, who also expended significantly more work to complete the same task. In all testers, a novel adaptive handle design was associated with significantly reduced total muscle work and post-instrumentation fatigue, as well as better comfort than conventional rigid handle designs. (4) Conclusions: An adaptive curette handle design demonstrated significantly better ergonomic outcomes than conventional rigid curette handle designs. Hygienists with MSDs expend significantly more muscle work during dental instrumentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11352665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), discomfort, fatigue, pain, and other acute and chronic work-related injuries are common among dental clinicians. Hand instruments constitute a primary risk factor for these conditions. The overall goal of this study was to compare in dental hygienists with healthy hands, and in those with MSDs, the effect of three different handle designs on instrumentation-related muscle work, comfort, fatigue, and quality of tactile feedback. (2) Methods: Clinicians tested three periodontal curettes: one with a novel adaptive silicone handle, another with a rigid resin handle, and the third with a rigid silicone handle. Ten hygienists-five with MSDs and five without-each scaled three typodonts using the three different curettes. Statistical analysis was performed using a General Linear Model (GLIM) and Tukey's post hoc test, and a significance level of p < 0.05 was implemented. (3) Results: On average, mean comfort and fatigue across all instruments were significantly worse in testers with MSDs, who also expended significantly more work to complete the same task. In all testers, a novel adaptive handle design was associated with significantly reduced total muscle work and post-instrumentation fatigue, as well as better comfort than conventional rigid handle designs. (4) Conclusions: An adaptive curette handle design demonstrated significantly better ergonomic outcomes than conventional rigid curette handle designs. Hygienists with MSDs expend significantly more muscle work during dental instrumentation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型自适应手柄设计对患有和未患有肌肉骨骼疾病的牙科卫生员使用牙周刮治器的人体工学性能的影响:一项试点临床研究。
(1) 背景:肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)、不适、疲劳、疼痛以及其他急性和慢性工伤在牙科临床医生中很常见。手部器械是导致这些病症的主要风险因素。本研究的总体目标是比较牙科卫生员健康的手和患有 MSD 的手,三种不同的手柄设计对器械相关肌肉工作、舒适度、疲劳度和触觉反馈质量的影响。(2)方法:临床医生测试了三种牙周刮治器:一种是新型自适应硅胶手柄,另一种是硬质树脂手柄,第三种是硬质硅胶手柄。十名卫生学家--五名患有 MSD,五名没有 MSD--使用这三种不同的刮治器各刮治了三颗类型牙。使用一般线性模型 (GLIM) 和 Tukey 后检验进行统计分析,显著性水平为 p <0.05。(3) 结果:平均而言,患有 MSD 的测试者在所有测试工具中的平均舒适度和疲劳度都明显较差,而且他们在完成相同任务时所需的工作量也明显较多。与传统的刚性手柄设计相比,新型自适应手柄设计能显著降低所有测试者的总肌肉工作量和仪器使用后的疲劳度,并能提高舒适度。(4) 结论:与传统的刚性刮刀手柄设计相比,自适应刮刀手柄设计的人体工学效果明显更好。患有 MSD 的卫生员在牙科器械操作过程中消耗的肌肉工作量明显更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Home Biofilm Management in Orthodontic Aligners: A Systematic Review. In Vitro Research Methods Used to Evaluate Shaping Ability of Rotary Endodontic Files-A Literature Review. Accuracy and Efficiency of the Surgical-Guide-Assisted Fiber Post Removal Technique for Anterior Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study. Correlation between Periodontitis and Onset of Alzheimer's Disease: A Literature Review. The Harmful Effects of Welding Fumes on Human Dental Enamel-A Microhardness Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1