Efficiency of Foot and Ankle Surgeries Completed on the Preoperative Stretcher vs Operating Room Table: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114241270272
Emily B Parker, Jeremy T Smith, Gregory Lausé, Eric M Bluman
{"title":"Efficiency of Foot and Ankle Surgeries Completed on the Preoperative Stretcher vs Operating Room Table: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Emily B Parker, Jeremy T Smith, Gregory Lausé, Eric M Bluman","doi":"10.1177/24730114241270272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extremity surgeons frequently operate on the preoperative stretcher rather than the operating room (OR) table. This study sought to identify differences between stretcher-based (SB) and OR table-based (TB) procedures with regard to time efficiency and OR team member preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficiency of SB vs OR TB foot and ankle procedures. Fifty-two patients undergoing a hardware removal, isolated gastrocnemius recession, soft tissue procedure, or foreign body removal at our day surgery unit were included. Start time and exit time were recorded. \"Start time\" was the number of minutes between the patient entering the OR and first incision. \"Exit time\" was the number of minutes between the procedure ending and the patient exiting the OR. Surveys were disseminated to OR staff who participated in the included cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total measured time in the OR was an average 6 minutes shorter in the Stretcher group compared to the OR Table group (10 minutes vs 16 minutes, <i>P</i> < .001). SB procedures were associated with a significantly shorter start time (median difference = 4 minutes, <i>P</i> = .001), but not exit time (median difference = 1 minute, <i>P</i> = .058). No difference was found in actual surgical time. Thirty (96.8%) OR team members perceived SB procedures as enhancing OR efficiency, and 30 (96.8%) respondents considered SB procedures to be equal or superior to OR TB procedures in terms of patient safety. All would recommend or strongly recommend SB procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found SB foot and ankle procedures to require less room time than OR TB procedures. Particularly for high-volume specialties, an average 6 minutes saved per case may meaningfully improve overall OR efficiency. Most OR team members believed that SB surgery improves OR efficiency and is the safer option for OR team members.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, randomized controlled trial, survey.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"9 3","pages":"24730114241270272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241270272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extremity surgeons frequently operate on the preoperative stretcher rather than the operating room (OR) table. This study sought to identify differences between stretcher-based (SB) and OR table-based (TB) procedures with regard to time efficiency and OR team member preferences.

Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficiency of SB vs OR TB foot and ankle procedures. Fifty-two patients undergoing a hardware removal, isolated gastrocnemius recession, soft tissue procedure, or foreign body removal at our day surgery unit were included. Start time and exit time were recorded. "Start time" was the number of minutes between the patient entering the OR and first incision. "Exit time" was the number of minutes between the procedure ending and the patient exiting the OR. Surveys were disseminated to OR staff who participated in the included cases.

Results: The total measured time in the OR was an average 6 minutes shorter in the Stretcher group compared to the OR Table group (10 minutes vs 16 minutes, P < .001). SB procedures were associated with a significantly shorter start time (median difference = 4 minutes, P = .001), but not exit time (median difference = 1 minute, P = .058). No difference was found in actual surgical time. Thirty (96.8%) OR team members perceived SB procedures as enhancing OR efficiency, and 30 (96.8%) respondents considered SB procedures to be equal or superior to OR TB procedures in terms of patient safety. All would recommend or strongly recommend SB procedures.

Conclusion: We found SB foot and ankle procedures to require less room time than OR TB procedures. Particularly for high-volume specialties, an average 6 minutes saved per case may meaningfully improve overall OR efficiency. Most OR team members believed that SB surgery improves OR efficiency and is the safer option for OR team members.

Level of evidence: Level II, randomized controlled trial, survey.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在术前担架与手术室手术台上完成足踝手术的效率:随机对照试验
背景:四肢外科医生经常在术前担架上而非手术室手术台上进行手术。本研究旨在确定担架手术(SB)与手术室手术台手术(TB)在时间效率和手术室团队成员偏好方面的差异:我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较 SB 和手术台 TB 足踝手术的效率。52名患者在我们的日间手术室接受了硬件移除、孤立腓肠肌后缩、软组织手术或异物移除手术。记录开始时间和结束时间。"开始时间 "是指患者从进入手术室到第一次切口之间的分钟数。"退出时间 "是指从手术结束到病人离开手术室之间的分钟数。调查表分发给参与其中病例的手术室工作人员:结果:与手术台组相比,担架组的手术室总测量时间平均缩短了 6 分钟(10 分钟 vs 16 分钟,P P = .001),但退出时间没有缩短(中位数差异 = 1 分钟,P = .058)。实际手术时间没有差异。30名(96.8%)手术室团队成员认为 SB 手术提高了手术室效率,30 名(96.8%)受访者认为就患者安全而言,SB 手术等同于或优于手术室 TB 手术。所有受访者都会推荐或强烈推荐 SB 手术:我们发现SB足踝手术所需的手术室时间少于TB手术。特别是对于高手术量的专科而言,每例手术平均节省 6 分钟可显著提高手术室的整体效率。大多数手术室团队成员认为,SB 手术提高了手术室效率,对手术室团队成员来说是更安全的选择:证据等级:二级,随机对照试验,调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
期刊最新文献
3D Analysis of Metatarsal Torsion by Computed Tomography in Normal, Hallux Valgus, and Hallux Rigidus Feet. A Retrospective Case Series of Single-Screw vs Dual-Screw Fixation for Treatment of Medial Malleolus Fractures. Long-term Outcomes After Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Reduction Quality in Posterior Malleolar Fractures Using a Modified Posteromedial Ankle Approach. Influence of Social Deprivation on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1