Prevalence of pulmonary nodules detected incidentally on noncancer-related imaging: a review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/imj.16502
Ankush Das, Asha Bonney, Renee Manser
{"title":"Prevalence of pulmonary nodules detected incidentally on noncancer-related imaging: a review","authors":"Ankush Das,&nbsp;Asha Bonney,&nbsp;Renee Manser","doi":"10.1111/imj.16502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pulmonary nodules are common incidental findings requiring surveillance. Follow-up recommendations vary depending on risk factors, size and solid or subsolid characteristics. This review aimed to evaluate the prevalence of clinically significant nodules detected on noncancer-dedicated imaging and the prevalence of part-solid and ground-glass nodules. We conducted a systematic search of literature and screened texts for eligibility. Clinically significant nodules were noncalcified nodules &gt;4–6 mm. Prevalence estimates were calculated for all studies and risk of bias was assessed by one reviewer. Twenty-four studies were included, with a total of 30 887 participants, and 21 studies were cross-sectional in design. Twenty-two studies used computed tomography (CT) imaging with cardiac-related CT being the most frequent. Prevalence of significant nodules was highest in studies with large field of view of the chest and low size thresholds for reporting nodules. The prevalence of part-solid and ground-glass nodules was only described in two cardiac-related CT studies. The overall risk of bias was low in seven studies and moderate in 17 studies. While current literature frequently reports incidental nodules on cardiovascular-related CT, there is minimal reporting of subsolid characteristics. Unclear quantification of smoking history and heterogeneity of imaging protocol also limits reliable evaluation of nodule prevalence in nonscreening cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"54 9","pages":"1440-1449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imj.16502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulmonary nodules are common incidental findings requiring surveillance. Follow-up recommendations vary depending on risk factors, size and solid or subsolid characteristics. This review aimed to evaluate the prevalence of clinically significant nodules detected on noncancer-dedicated imaging and the prevalence of part-solid and ground-glass nodules. We conducted a systematic search of literature and screened texts for eligibility. Clinically significant nodules were noncalcified nodules >4–6 mm. Prevalence estimates were calculated for all studies and risk of bias was assessed by one reviewer. Twenty-four studies were included, with a total of 30 887 participants, and 21 studies were cross-sectional in design. Twenty-two studies used computed tomography (CT) imaging with cardiac-related CT being the most frequent. Prevalence of significant nodules was highest in studies with large field of view of the chest and low size thresholds for reporting nodules. The prevalence of part-solid and ground-glass nodules was only described in two cardiac-related CT studies. The overall risk of bias was low in seven studies and moderate in 17 studies. While current literature frequently reports incidental nodules on cardiovascular-related CT, there is minimal reporting of subsolid characteristics. Unclear quantification of smoking history and heterogeneity of imaging protocol also limits reliable evaluation of nodule prevalence in nonscreening cohorts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非癌症相关成像中偶然发现的肺结节的发病率:综述。
肺结节是常见的偶然发现,需要进行监测。随访建议因风险因素、大小、实性或亚实性特征而异。本综述旨在评估在非癌症专用成像中发现的具有临床意义的结节的患病率,以及部分实性结节和磨玻璃结节的患病率。我们对文献进行了系统性检索,并筛选了符合条件的文本。有临床意义的结节是指大于 4-6 毫米的非钙化结节。我们计算了所有研究的患病率估计值,并由一名审稿人对偏倚风险进行了评估。共纳入了 24 项研究,共有 30 887 人参与,其中 21 项研究为横断面设计。22项研究使用了计算机断层扫描(CT)成像,其中与心脏相关的CT最为常见。胸部视野大、报告结节大小阈值低的研究中,明显结节的发生率最高。只有两项与心脏相关的 CT 研究描述了部分实性结节和磨玻璃结节的发生率。7 项研究的总体偏倚风险较低,17 项研究的偏倚风险中等。虽然目前的文献经常报告心血管相关 CT 上的偶发结节,但关于亚实性特征的报告却很少。吸烟史量化不明确和成像方案的异质性也限制了对非筛查队列中结节患病率的可靠评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
期刊最新文献
Final results of the National Oncology Mentorship Program 2023 and its impact on burnout and professional fulfilment. Platelet factor 4 immune disease: medical emergencies that look like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Correction to: 'Managing cancer-related pain in the setting of proven IgE-mediated opioid anaphylaxis'. Real-world impact of pembrolizumab availability for deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer. Environmental impact of large language models in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1