Comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pharmacotherapies for acute mania in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1038/s41380-024-02705-3
Wenbo Huang, Shuyang He, Mingxin Liu, Jilai Xu
{"title":"Comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pharmacotherapies for acute mania in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Wenbo Huang, Shuyang He, Mingxin Liu, Jilai Xu","doi":"10.1038/s41380-024-02705-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of currently used pharmacological treatments for adults with acute bipolar mania. To achieve this, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) using R software and related packages. We searched primary clinical databases until February 2023 for reports of randomized controlled trials of drug treatments and adjunctive therapies for adults with acute bipolar mania, with outcomes including efficacy (mean change from baseline to endpoint in mania rating scores), safety (clinically significant adverse events from baseline to end of treatment), and tolerability (the proportion of patients who completed the whole trial to the planned endpoint). A total of 113 studies were included in our analysis, in which 23,491 participants (50.38% males; mean age = 38.6 years; mean study duration = 3.39 weeks; mean manic baseline score = 29.37) were randomly allocated to one of 51 monotherapies, adjunctive treatments, or placebo. Our results showed that tamoxifen (mean difference, -22.31 [-25.97, -18.63], N = 2, n1 = 43, n2 = 39) and tamoxifen+ lithium or valproate (LIT/VAL) (-16.37 [-22.55, -10.25], N = 1, n1 = 20, n2 = 20) had the best and second-best clinical efficacy in adults with acute bipolar mania over the placebo. Furthermore, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, risperidone, divalproex, and haloperidol were significantly better tolerated than placebo. Combination therapies of antipsychotics and LIT/VAL appeared to be more effective than their corresponding monotherapies. While pharmacotherapies were associated with specific common adverse events, we found no evidence of increased incidence of headache or depression events compared to the placebo. Overall, our NMAs provided important insights into the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of pharmacological treatments for acute bipolar mania and can help guide treatment decisions for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02705-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of currently used pharmacological treatments for adults with acute bipolar mania. To achieve this, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) using R software and related packages. We searched primary clinical databases until February 2023 for reports of randomized controlled trials of drug treatments and adjunctive therapies for adults with acute bipolar mania, with outcomes including efficacy (mean change from baseline to endpoint in mania rating scores), safety (clinically significant adverse events from baseline to end of treatment), and tolerability (the proportion of patients who completed the whole trial to the planned endpoint). A total of 113 studies were included in our analysis, in which 23,491 participants (50.38% males; mean age = 38.6 years; mean study duration = 3.39 weeks; mean manic baseline score = 29.37) were randomly allocated to one of 51 monotherapies, adjunctive treatments, or placebo. Our results showed that tamoxifen (mean difference, -22.31 [-25.97, -18.63], N = 2, n1 = 43, n2 = 39) and tamoxifen+ lithium or valproate (LIT/VAL) (-16.37 [-22.55, -10.25], N = 1, n1 = 20, n2 = 20) had the best and second-best clinical efficacy in adults with acute bipolar mania over the placebo. Furthermore, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, risperidone, divalproex, and haloperidol were significantly better tolerated than placebo. Combination therapies of antipsychotics and LIT/VAL appeared to be more effective than their corresponding monotherapies. While pharmacotherapies were associated with specific common adverse events, we found no evidence of increased incidence of headache or depression events compared to the placebo. Overall, our NMAs provided important insights into the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of pharmacological treatments for acute bipolar mania and can help guide treatment decisions for clinicians.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人急性躁狂症药物疗法的疗效、安全性和耐受性比较:随机对照试验的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
本研究旨在就目前用于成人急性躁狂症患者的药物治疗的有效性、安全性和耐受性提供循证建议。为此,我们使用 R 软件和相关软件包进行了系统回顾和网络荟萃分析 (NMA)。我们检索了截至 2023 年 2 月的主要临床数据库,以了解针对急性双相躁狂症成人患者的药物治疗和辅助疗法的随机对照试验报告,试验结果包括疗效(从基线到终点的躁狂评分的平均变化)、安全性(从基线到治疗结束的临床重大不良事件)和耐受性(完成整个试验到计划终点的患者比例)。我们的分析共纳入了 113 项研究,其中 23,491 名参与者(50.38% 为男性;平均年龄 = 38.6 岁;平均研究持续时间 = 3.39 周;平均躁狂基线评分 = 29.37)被随机分配到 51 种单一疗法、辅助疗法或安慰剂中的一种。结果显示,他莫昔芬(平均差,-22.31 [-25.97,-18.63],N=2,n1=43,n2=39)和他莫昔芬+锂或丙戊酸钠(LIT/VAL)(-16.37 [-22.55,-10.25],N=1,n1=20,n2=20)对急性双相躁狂症成人患者的临床疗效分别优于安慰剂和安慰剂次之。此外,奥氮平、帕利哌酮、喹硫平、齐拉西酮、利培酮、二丙戊酸钠和氟哌啶醇的耐受性明显优于安慰剂。抗精神病药物和 LIT/VAL 的联合疗法似乎比相应的单一疗法更有效。虽然药物疗法与特定的常见不良事件有关,但我们没有发现与安慰剂相比头痛或抑郁事件发生率增加的证据。总之,我们的NMAs为急性双相躁狂症的药物治疗的有效性、安全性和耐受性提供了重要的见解,有助于为临床医生的治疗决策提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
期刊最新文献
Both GEF domains of the autism and developmental epileptic encephalopathy-associated Trio protein are required for proper tangential migration of GABAergic interneurons Psychedelics and schizophrenia: a double-edged sword Impaired emotion recognition in Cntnap2-deficient mice is associated with hyper-synchronous prefrontal cortex neuronal activity A randomized proof-of-mechanism trial of TNF antagonism for motivational deficits and related corticostriatal circuitry in depressed patients with high inflammation Acute COVID-19 severity markers predict post-COVID new-onset psychiatric disorders: A 2-year cohort study of 34,489 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1