Long Neurocognitive and Neuropsychiatric Sequelae in Participants with Post-COVID-19 Infection: A Longitudinal Study.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology International Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.3390/neurolint16040064
Marta Almeria, Juan Carlos Cejudo, Joan Deus, Jerzy Krupinski
{"title":"Long Neurocognitive and Neuropsychiatric Sequelae in Participants with Post-COVID-19 Infection: A Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Marta Almeria, Juan Carlos Cejudo, Joan Deus, Jerzy Krupinski","doi":"10.3390/neurolint16040064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and characterize the cognitive changes in COVID-19 participants at 6-month follow-up, and to explore a possible association with clinical symptoms, emotional disturbance and disease severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center longitudinal cohort study included participants aged 20 and 60 years old to exclude cognitive impairment age-associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection. The initial evaluation occurred 10 to 30 days after hospital or ambulatory discharge, with a subsequent follow-up at 6 months. Patients who had a history of cognitive impairment, neurological conditions, or serious psychiatric disorders were not included. Information on demographics and laboratory results was gathered from medical records. Cognitive outcomes were assessed with a neuropsychological battery including attention, verbal and visual memory, language and executive function tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 participants were included in the study, and 108 completed the follow-up visit. At the 6-month follow-up, comparing the means from baseline with those of the follow-up evaluation, significant overall improvement was observed in verbal and visual memory subtests (<i>p</i> = 0.001), processing speed (<i>p</i> = 0.001), executive function (<i>p</i> = 0.028; <i>p</i> = 0.016) and naming (<i>p</i> = 0.001), independently of disease severity and cognitive complaints. Anxiety and depression were significantly higher in groups with Subjective Cognitive Complaints (SCC) compared to those without (<i>p</i> < 0.01 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent symptoms are common regardless of disease severity and are often linked to cognitive complaints. Six months after COVID-19, the most frequently reported symptoms included headache, dyspnea, fatigue, cognitive complaints, anxiety, and depression. No cognitive impairment was found to be associated with the severity of COVID-19. Overall, neuropsychological and psychopathological improvement was observed at 6 months regardless of disease severity and cognitive complaints.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"16 4","pages":"853-868"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11357167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16040064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and characterize the cognitive changes in COVID-19 participants at 6-month follow-up, and to explore a possible association with clinical symptoms, emotional disturbance and disease severity.

Methods: This single-center longitudinal cohort study included participants aged 20 and 60 years old to exclude cognitive impairment age-associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection. The initial evaluation occurred 10 to 30 days after hospital or ambulatory discharge, with a subsequent follow-up at 6 months. Patients who had a history of cognitive impairment, neurological conditions, or serious psychiatric disorders were not included. Information on demographics and laboratory results was gathered from medical records. Cognitive outcomes were assessed with a neuropsychological battery including attention, verbal and visual memory, language and executive function tests.

Results: A total of 200 participants were included in the study, and 108 completed the follow-up visit. At the 6-month follow-up, comparing the means from baseline with those of the follow-up evaluation, significant overall improvement was observed in verbal and visual memory subtests (p = 0.001), processing speed (p = 0.001), executive function (p = 0.028; p = 0.016) and naming (p = 0.001), independently of disease severity and cognitive complaints. Anxiety and depression were significantly higher in groups with Subjective Cognitive Complaints (SCC) compared to those without (p < 0.01 for both).

Conclusions: Persistent symptoms are common regardless of disease severity and are often linked to cognitive complaints. Six months after COVID-19, the most frequently reported symptoms included headache, dyspnea, fatigue, cognitive complaints, anxiety, and depression. No cognitive impairment was found to be associated with the severity of COVID-19. Overall, neuropsychological and psychopathological improvement was observed at 6 months regardless of disease severity and cognitive complaints.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19感染后参与者的长期神经认知和神经精神后遗症:纵向研究。
目的评估 COVID-19 参与者在 6 个月随访期间的认知变化并确定其特征,同时探讨其与临床症状、情绪障碍和疾病严重程度之间可能存在的关联:这项单中心纵向队列研究纳入了 20 至 60 岁的参与者,以排除与确诊 COVID-19 感染年龄相关的认知障碍。首次评估在出院后 10 到 30 天进行,随后随访 6 个月。有认知障碍、神经系统疾病或严重精神障碍病史的患者不包括在内。有关人口统计学和实验室结果的信息均来自医疗记录。认知结果通过神经心理学测试进行评估,包括注意力、言语和视觉记忆、语言和执行功能测试:共有 200 名参与者参与了研究,其中 108 人完成了随访。在为期 6 个月的随访中,将基线平均值与随访评估的平均值进行比较,可以观察到言语和视觉记忆子测试(p = 0.001)、处理速度(p = 0.001)、执行功能(p = 0.028;p = 0.016)和命名(p = 0.001)的整体改善效果显著,且不受疾病严重程度和认知主诉的影响。与无主观认知症状组相比,有主观认知症状组的焦虑和抑郁程度明显更高(两者的 p 均小于 0.01):结论:无论疾病严重程度如何,持续性症状都很常见,而且往往与认知抱怨有关。COVID-19 六个月后,最常报告的症状包括头痛、呼吸困难、疲劳、认知投诉、焦虑和抑郁。没有发现认知障碍与 COVID-19 的严重程度有关。总体而言,无论疾病严重程度和认知症状如何,6 个月后神经心理学和精神病理学均有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bridging the Gap: Improving Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes with Intravenous Thrombolysis Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy. UBL3 Interacts with PolyQ-Expanded Huntingtin Fragments and Modifies Their Intracellular Sorting. Redefining Infarction Size for Small-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Syndrome Sinistre: Left Brachiocephalic Vein Compression and its Neurological Manifestations. A Retrospective Study of Lateral Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve Neuropathy: Electrodiagnostic Findings and Etiologies in 49 Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1