The Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Depression in the German-Speaking D-A-CH Region Including an Investigation of Potential Moderators and Mediators.

Susanne Strohmaier, Manuel Pillai, Jakob Weitzer, Emilie Han, Lukas Zenk, Brenda M Birmann, Martin Bertau, Guido Caniglia, Manfred D Laubichler, Gerald Steiner, Eva S Schernhammer
{"title":"The Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Depression in the German-Speaking D-A-CH Region Including an Investigation of Potential Moderators and Mediators.","authors":"Susanne Strohmaier, Manuel Pillai, Jakob Weitzer, Emilie Han, Lukas Zenk, Brenda M Birmann, Martin Bertau, Guido Caniglia, Manfred D Laubichler, Gerald Steiner, Eva S Schernhammer","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe14080144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considerable evidence links the \"Big Five\" personality traits (neuroticism, extroversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness) with depression. However, potential mediating and moderating factors are less well understood. We utilized data from a cross-sectional survey of 3065 German-speaking adults from the D-A-CH region to estimate multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervalsbetween personality traits and lifetime prevalence of depression (overall and stratified by sex and age). We further explored proportions mediated by psychosocial factors optimism, empathy, perspective-taking, work-life balance, and interpersonal trust. High levels of neuroticism were associated with more than two-fold higher odds of depression, whereas higher levels of conscientiousness were associated with approximately 30% lower odds of depression. The association with neuroticism persisted in all investigated subgroups; apparently, stronger associations for females and participants aged ≥60 years did not correspond to statistically significant interactions. Overall and across all strata, the association of neuroticism with depression appeared to be mediated in part by the considered psychosocial factors; optimism explained the largest proportion of the association. Our results provide empirical evidence for the dynamic predisposition model. Further investigations of these relationships are warranted in longitudinal data with more precise outcome assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"14 8","pages":"2157-2174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14080144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considerable evidence links the "Big Five" personality traits (neuroticism, extroversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness) with depression. However, potential mediating and moderating factors are less well understood. We utilized data from a cross-sectional survey of 3065 German-speaking adults from the D-A-CH region to estimate multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervalsbetween personality traits and lifetime prevalence of depression (overall and stratified by sex and age). We further explored proportions mediated by psychosocial factors optimism, empathy, perspective-taking, work-life balance, and interpersonal trust. High levels of neuroticism were associated with more than two-fold higher odds of depression, whereas higher levels of conscientiousness were associated with approximately 30% lower odds of depression. The association with neuroticism persisted in all investigated subgroups; apparently, stronger associations for females and participants aged ≥60 years did not correspond to statistically significant interactions. Overall and across all strata, the association of neuroticism with depression appeared to be mediated in part by the considered psychosocial factors; optimism explained the largest proportion of the association. Our results provide empirical evidence for the dynamic predisposition model. Further investigations of these relationships are warranted in longitudinal data with more precise outcome assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
D-A-CH德语区的大五人格特质与抑郁症之间的关系,包括对潜在调节因素和中介因素的调查》(The Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Depression in German-Speaking D-A-CH Region Including an Investigation of Potential Moderators and Mediators.
大量证据表明,"五大 "人格特质(神经质、外向性、自觉性、合意性和开放性)与抑郁症有关。然而,人们对潜在的中介和调节因素却知之甚少。我们利用对 3065 名来自 D-A-CH 地区的德语成年人进行的横断面调查数据,估算了人格特质与抑郁症终生患病率(总体以及按性别和年龄分层)之间的多变量调整后的几率比和 95% 的置信区间。我们进一步探讨了由心理社会因素乐观、同理心、透视法、工作与生活的平衡以及人际信任所介导的比例。神经质水平高的人患抑郁症的几率要高出两倍多,而自觉性水平高的人患抑郁症的几率要低约 30%。神经质与抑郁症的关系在所有被调查的亚组中都持续存在;显然,女性和年龄≥60 岁的参与者的神经质与抑郁症的关系更强,但在统计学上并没有显著的交互作用。总体而言,在所有阶层中,神经质与抑郁的关联似乎部分地受到了所考虑的社会心理因素的影响;乐观解释了最大比例的关联。我们的研究结果为动态易感模型提供了经验证据。有必要通过纵向数据和更精确的结果评估来进一步研究这些关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
FOBism Unveiled: Quantifying Assimilative Racism within Asians in the United States. The Mental Suffering of Cocaine-Addicted Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Personality Disorders' Prevalence and Their Association with Psychopathological Symptoms. The Role of Family in the Life Satisfaction of Young Adults: An Ecological-Systemic Perspective. Interculturality in the Development of Technology-Mediated Courses for Massive Health Education: A Systematic Review. The Mediating Role of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in the Relationship between Adult Attachment and Quality of Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1