Patient experiences of remote consulting with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis and fibromyalgia: a qualitative study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0079
Helen Leach, Abi Eccles, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Helen Atherton
{"title":"Patient experiences of remote consulting with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis and fibromyalgia: a qualitative study.","authors":"Helen Leach, Abi Eccles, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Helen Atherton","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote and digital consulting in primary care has rapidly expanded since March 2020. It is important to understand patient experiences, particularly for those living with complex long-term conditions, to identify how care can best be delivered, including within the remote space.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the experiences of people living with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis [CFS/ME] and Fibromyalgia when consulting remotely in primary care.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with patients living with CFS/ME and fibromyalgia in general practice in England METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 13 participants. The interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically according to a Foucauldian theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants highlighted needing to feel believed by clinicians. Many reported difficulties with telephone and online consulting due to the lack of physical communication. Positive outcomes were reported when there was a good relationship with a clinician. Continuity in care and recognising the complexity of these conditions were also considered important.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study allowed people living with CFS/ME and Fibromyalgia to describe their experiences when consulting remotely. Participants highlighted needing to feel listened to and felt they benefited from an ongoing relationship with a clinician although this was difficult to achieve when consulting remotely. Some advantages of remoted consulting were reported, particularly when symptoms were troublesome. Flexible access systems with a range of consultation modalities or preferred clinician(s) availability could improve healthcare encounters, particularly given the increased use of remote consulting, in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remote and digital consulting in primary care has rapidly expanded since March 2020. It is important to understand patient experiences, particularly for those living with complex long-term conditions, to identify how care can best be delivered, including within the remote space.

Aim: To explore the experiences of people living with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis [CFS/ME] and Fibromyalgia when consulting remotely in primary care.

Design & setting: Semi-structured interviews with patients living with CFS/ME and fibromyalgia in general practice in England METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 13 participants. The interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically according to a Foucauldian theoretical framework.

Results: All participants highlighted needing to feel believed by clinicians. Many reported difficulties with telephone and online consulting due to the lack of physical communication. Positive outcomes were reported when there was a good relationship with a clinician. Continuity in care and recognising the complexity of these conditions were also considered important.

Conclusion: This study allowed people living with CFS/ME and Fibromyalgia to describe their experiences when consulting remotely. Participants highlighted needing to feel listened to and felt they benefited from an ongoing relationship with a clinician although this was difficult to achieve when consulting remotely. Some advantages of remoted consulting were reported, particularly when symptoms were troublesome. Flexible access systems with a range of consultation modalities or preferred clinician(s) availability could improve healthcare encounters, particularly given the increased use of remote consulting, in primary care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎和纤维肌痛患者的远程咨询体验:一项定性研究。
背景:自 2020 年 3 月以来,初级医疗中的远程和数字咨询迅速扩展。目的:探讨慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎(CFS/ME)和纤维肌痛患者在初级医疗远程咨询时的经历:对英格兰全科医生中的 CFS/ME 和纤维肌痛患者进行半结构化访谈 方法:对 13 名参与者进行了半结构化访谈。根据福柯理论框架对访谈内容进行了誊写和专题分析:结果:所有参与者都强调需要感到被临床医生信任。许多人表示,由于缺乏实际交流,电话和在线咨询存在困难。当与临床医生保持良好关系时,就会产生积极的结果。持续护理和认识到这些疾病的复杂性也被认为非常重要:这项研究让 CFS/ME 和纤维肌痛患者描述了他们在远程咨询时的经历。参与者强调他们需要被倾听的感觉,并认为他们从与临床医生的持续关系中受益匪浅,尽管这在远程咨询时很难实现。据报告,远程会诊有一些优势,尤其是当症状令人烦恼时。具有一系列咨询模式或首选临床医生的灵活访问系统可以改善医疗保健接触,特别是考虑到远程咨询在初级保健中的使用越来越多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exploring the facilitators and barriers to addressing social media's impact on anxiety within primary care: a qualitative study. Action on elevated natriuretic peptide in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study. 'ThinkCancer!': randomised feasibility trial of a novel practice-based early cancer diagnosis intervention. Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1